Sentences with phrase «dividend yield on costs»

My dividend Yield on Costs on the acquired stock positions stands at 3.9 %, adding USD 140 to my projected annual dividend income.

With Heineken you don't get a high dividend yield on costs when you enter into the position, neither strong annual dividend growth.

Current YOC: My personal dividend yield on cost when factoring in my average purchase prices with the annual dividend as it currently stands..

Financial fundamentals are pretty sound and I've been more than pleased to enter into that interesting position, offering me a forward dividend yield on cost of well above 5.5 %.

This includes a 2.32 % dividend yield on cost.

An important point for my buying decision is as well the dividend yield on cost, which is currently at 2.73 % based on the new yearly dividend of 3.36 USD.

I don't for a moment think TLS will be a 10 - bagger but if it grows steadily, it will provide a good dividend yield on cost with some decent price appreciation.

First, let's have a look at the group of «dividend growers» with quite remarkable increases and let's also have a look at the projected dividend yield on cost (YoC) with regard to these postitions (net of taxes).

Not exact matches

I want to share the current state of my dividend portfolio, related to market value, forward - looking dividends, yield and yield on cost.

After a decade of dividend growth and patient dividend reinvestment, this investment is generating an yield on cost of 15 %.

As you can see in the chart above, December's purchases resulted in a total increase of $ 8.27 to my forward 12 - month dividends and carried an overall average yield on cost of 2.18 %.

While you can find plenty of stocks with higher yields, General Dynamics» double - digit dividend growth rate implies that over time, investors could collect a much higher yield on cost.

I know yield on cost isn't the best metric, but dividend growth is always nice.

Through goal # 4 I track my forward dividend income (goal # 2) as a percentage of my portfolio — i.e. my yield on cost (YOC).

Raising the dividend will greatly improve you're yield on cost, or YoC.

HSBC offers a Dividend Reinvestment Plan (DRIP) and given the high yield on cost, my share count will inrease nicely over time.

After holding for three years I realized that my other dividend growth investments had a higher yield on cost and the difference was only going to get greater as time went on.

Essentially, the new rental income generated by the properties bought with new debt or issued shares isn't high enough (due to low cash yields on new properties) to offset the greater share count, which raises the cost of the dividend.

The higher dividend yield (4.1 %) on this purchase increases my Ford yield on cost from 3.77 % to 3.86 % * and my portfolio yield on cost went from 3.51 % to 3.53 %.

Unfortunately my portfolio yield on cost decreased from 3.18 % to 3.08 % but again, dividend growth should bring it right back up very soon.

This purchase brings my Dividend Retirement portfolio yield on cost down to 3.17 % from 3.25 %.

It's the investor who has held a stock for twenty years and has seen their dividend yield - on - cost march its way up to 40 % of their initial purchase price who gets to enjoy compounding's magic.

Yield on Cost (YOC) is the annual dividend rate of a security, divided by its average cost baCost (YOC) is the annual dividend rate of a security, divided by its average cost bacost basis.

(Yield on cost is today's dividend divided by your original purchase price.)

If the number of shares owned by the investor does not change, the yield on cost will increase if the company increases the dividend it pays to shareholders; otherwise yield on cost will remain constant.

To calculate yield on cost for a stock, an investor must divide the stock's annual dividend by the average cost basis per share and multiple the resulting number by 100 (to arrive at a percentage).

I know yield on cost isn't the best metric, but dividend growth is always nice.

Ryan @ CML presents How to Calculate the Yield on Cost of a Dividend Stock posted at Cash Money Life, saying, «Tips on calculating the yield on cost of a dividend stock, an important indicator of how your dividend portfolio is performing.&rYield on Cost of a Dividend Stock posted at Cash Money Life, saying, «Tips on calculating the yield on cost of a dividend stock, an important indicator of how your dividend portfolio is performing.&raCost of a Dividend Stock posted at Cash Money Life, saying, «Tips on calculating the yield on cost of a dividend stock, an important indicator of how your dividend portfolio is performingDividend Stock posted at Cash Money Life, saying, «Tips on calculating the yield on cost of a dividend stock, an important indicator of how your dividend portfolio is performing.&ryield on cost of a dividend stock, an important indicator of how your dividend portfolio is performing.&racost of a dividend stock, an important indicator of how your dividend portfolio is performingdividend stock, an important indicator of how your dividend portfolio is performingdividend portfolio is performing.»

The investor who is focused only on the dividend will enthusiastically point out that his income has risen by 5 % every year, and that he's now earning a 6.5 % yield on cost.

In an RRSP, you will pay a 15 % withholding tax on dividends if you use VUN (this works out to a cost of 0.30 %, assuming a 2 % yield).

Dividend investors dwell on their «growing income» and «increasing yield on cost» as though these are unique to their strategy.

Adding 84 shares of OHI to my Dividend Retirement portfolio increases my portfolio yield on cost to 3.33 % (from 3.08 %), a very nice boost.

I took a slight hit on portfolio yield on cost but nothing a 50 % dividend growth rate can't fix.

Since we launched Cabot Dividend Investor in 2014, our top recommendations have delivered 50 % total returns with a yield on cost of 3.7 % while our top income recommendations have delivered yields as high as 6.7 %.

If this dividend growth rate continues my yield on cost would be almost 9 % in 5 years!

The dividend is cut in half as well, so the yield on cost stays the same.

Growing dividends over time incrementally increases yield on cost, and for the dividend growth investor, Enbridge's growth prospects are unique.

Yield on cost is part of the magic sauce that makes dividend growth investing work so well long term.

This corresponded to an annual dividend of $ 1.08 / share, for an effective yield on cost of 7.10 %.

My initial yield on cost for this dividend portfolio was 3.54 % and my expected annual income was $ 951.80 (before raises — see below).

So my goal of 10 % yield on cost within 10 years becomes this specific target: I want the DGP to be generating dividends at a rate of $ 4678 annually by June 1, 2018.

This disparity results from the fact that REITs: 1) often focus on institutional quality assets and markets that have relatively low yields; 2) have corporate overhead costs to cover; and 3) want to avoid the risk of having to lower their dividends in the future — and thus only pay out a conservative level they believe to be sustainable.

The «yield on cost» illusion is explained well here by Canadian Couch Potato in his series of Dividend Myths.

In this lesson, let's talk about two essential metrics in dividend growth investing: Yield and yield on Yield and yield on yield on cost.

That allows me to make some projections regarding organic dividend growth and my expected Yield on Cost (YoC) in 2017 regarding these positions which I sumarised in the chart above.

That allows me to make some projections regarding organic dividend growth and my expected Yield on Cost (YoC) regarding each position (see chart above).

Yes, your income should go up each each year — McCormick is a fantastic dividend grower — but because you're starting with such a low entry yield it will take a decade before you're generating meaningful yield - on - cost.

If the dividend increases continue at this rate I can expect a yield on cost of ~ 4.8 % in 5 years.

I think I've made my point above that the average cost basis must include reinvested dividends, so by definition the «purchased shares» method more accurately measures yield on cost.

(Will you pay $ 650 or $ 750 for the same 100 shares)(Yield helps to determine if one could get a better investment for that extra $ 100 in another stock) Once you purchase the stock, you focus on «yield on cost» (If dividends go up, your «Yield on Cost» goes up, if the dividend remains the same then your «Yield on Cost» remains the sYield helps to determine if one could get a better investment for that extra $ 100 in another stock) Once you purchase the stock, you focus on «yield on cost» (If dividends go up, your «Yield on Cost» goes up, if the dividend remains the same then your «Yield on Cost» remains the syield on cost» (If dividends go up, your «Yield on Cost» goes up, if the dividend remains the same then your «Yield on Cost» remains the sacost» (If dividends go up, your «Yield on Cost» goes up, if the dividend remains the same then your «Yield on Cost» remains the sYield on Cost» goes up, if the dividend remains the same then your «Yield on Cost» remains the saCost» goes up, if the dividend remains the same then your «Yield on Cost» remains the sYield on Cost» remains the saCost» remains the same).