On the contrary, the company's average
dividend quality score of 50 out of a possible score of 100, lessens its attractiveness for dividend investors.
However, the company's average
dividend quality score of 58 out of a possible score of 100, points to some weakness in the sustainability of its robust payout ratio, and makes its less attractive for dividend investors seeking current income.
In addition, the company's relatively good
dividend quality score of 67 out of a possible score of 100 points to some sustainability of its robust payout ratio, and underscores its attractiveness for dividend investors seeking current income.
Supporting this is the company's average
dividend quality score of 58 out of a possible score of 100, which points to some weakness in being able to sustain the higher payout ratio.
However, the company's relatively low
dividend quality score of 33 out of a possible score of 100 raises questions on the sustainability of its robust payout ratio.
Not exact matches
As of May 2, 2018 the iShares International
Dividend Growth ETF MSCI ESG Fund
Quality Score is 6.62 out of 10.
S&P Earnings and
Dividend Rankings: The Standard & Poor's Earnings and
Dividend Rankings (also known as «
quality rankings»)
score the financial
quality of several thousand US stocks from A + through D with data going back to 1956.
I looked at yields,
Dividend Safety
scores from Simply Safe
Dividends, ex-
dividend dates (so as not to miss a Q4 payment), company
quality, and valuation.
It's a very high
quality bio-pharmaceutical company with a
dividend safety
score of 93.