This seems to me that Paul was adamant about
dividing over the theology of the Gospel.
Churches are
divided over theology, politics, leadership, music style, finances, ministry opportunities, community involvement, what is and isn't sin, and numerous other issues.
Not exact matches
For the last three weeks, I've received dozens of angry tweets and YouTube comments
over my article «The
Theology That's
Dividing Christian Hip - Hop,» ranging from calling me a bad journalist to accusations that I can't possibly be a Christian.
Over the past 40 years, since the Second Vatican Council (1962 - 65), the Catholic Church in the U.S. has become increasingly divided over liturgy, theology, catechesis, ministry, sexuality and a host of other iss
Over the past 40 years, since the Second Vatican Council (1962 - 65), the Catholic Church in the U.S. has become increasingly
divided over liturgy, theology, catechesis, ministry, sexuality and a host of other iss
over liturgy,
theology, catechesis, ministry, sexuality and a host of other issues.
His five - point agenda for post-fundamentalist evangelicalism included: (1) clarification of the philosophical implications of biblical theism, (2) Christian engagement with the pressing social issues of the day as well as concern for individual salvation, (3) refusal to
divide over secondary matters such as the details of biblical prophecy, (4) openness to the possibility of a biblically faithful ecumenicity, and (5) the development of a truly biblical
theology that took into consideration the whole sweep of salvation history.