«You know what men are like...» «I know something about men and know...» Who can believe that fabulously great statement of
the divine creation of man?
Not exact matches
Christianity, for example, is essentially based on the twofold belief that
man is in a special sense an object
of pursuit to the
divine power throughout
creation, and that Christ is the terminal point at which, supernaturally but also physically, the consummation
of humanity is destined to be achieved.
Since the dawn
of creation it has been the aim
of the
divine will to further the spiritual progress
of man by providing the guidance which enables
man to arrange his daily affairs so that he lives wisely and correctly, «and there is not a nation but a warner hath passed among them» (Surah XXXV, 24).
[22] Once that image
of love was desecrated by sin, it had to be recast in the furnace
of divine love.The Incarnation marks the moment when the image
of the invisible God became
man, renewing
man's image in a new
creation so that
men might become in Him who they were forever intended to be in God's eyes, the image
of the God who is love (Eph.
The Christian approach would ideally include the desire to uncover and probe the goodness, beauty and
divine purpose
of creation, as well as an emphasis upon the pre-eminence
of love among
men and the dire effects
of sin on
creation in general (see Romans 8.22) and on
men in particular.
Here Aulen finds special significance in Irenaeus» doctrine
of the
divine action as a reconstituting (recapitulating)
of humanity's history
of creation and fall and the restoration
of man's rightful maturity and direction.
Jesus was conceived by the Holy Spirit, that means Jesus body was a new
creation, Jesus was a new
man (
of course Jesus Christ's
divine nature is eternal, and not created).
This was no
creation of the Gospel
of Mark — indeed, Mark steps back from it, in the act
of trying to prove that Jesus was secretly the
divine Son
of Man during his life upon earth.
On the other hand,
man too is active, but his activity is also in love; he responds freely to the love which is given him and in that response he knows that he is truly «being himself», for he was intended by his
creation to be a responding lover and in no sense a marionette pulled by strings manipulated by God — certainly not the victim
of the
divine coercion.
The Catechism does at several points touch on a more synthetic integration
of all God's works, commenting that «
creation is revealed as the first step towards» the final Covenant
of Love (CCC 288) and that» God created the world the sake
of communion with his
divine life, a communion brought about by the convocation
of men in Christ, and this convocation is the Church» (CCC 760).
The flaws in the basics
of the religion are proof enough to me that they were not
of «
divine creation» rather the flawed works
of man.
But the individual need not experience his life in and
of itself, but as participating in the broad sweep
of divine creation, contributing in its small way to the increased intensification
of divine experience, making possible the emergence
of new forms
of existence beyond
man.
But if our thesis that the work
of redemption includes a work
of creation in which human creative effort shares is valid, then this radical separation between the
divine love and
man's works
of love must be shown to be a distortion
of the fact.
The first and last word, ranging in the Bible from the majestic symbolism
of the Genesis story
of creation to other great imagery in the book
of Revelation, is that
man is a spiritual creature, made in the
divine likeness, the child
of God and intended by God for eternity.
1:20 - 27 1:20 For since the
creation of the world God's invisible qualities — his eternal power and
divine nature — have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that
men are without excuse.
These aims do not lose their particularity in being broadened to embrace all mankind, since from the
divine perspective
man is only one particular form
of creation.
it has upset the primeval balance
of God's
creation and reduced
man's
diviner part to an abject slavery.
It is marked on its negative side by the rejection not only
of the symbols
of the
creation, the fall and the salvation
of men, but also
of the belief in human dependence and limitation, in human wickedness and frailty, in
divine forgiveness through the suffering
of the innocent.
to be direct, the Bible puts it this way... «For since the
creation of the world God's invisible qualities — his eternal power and
divine nature — have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that
men are without excuse.»
It was perhaps already in contact with speculations regarding the
divine purpose in the
creation of the world, the angelic powers, the figures
of Adam, Death, Satan or Antichrist, the Heavenly
Man, the coming salvation, the relation
of spirit and flesh, soul and body — speculations which were at least tinged, no doubt, with Gnosticism.
If we see the Incarnation as the predestined final crowning
of all
creation in Christ, Son
of God and
of Man, whose kingly destiny is changed, by the
divine mercy, into a painful Redemption
of his fallen inheritance, then we have a much more majestic vision
of Christ, one much more in conformity with the vision
of John and Paul, and one much more capable
of development in the theology
of gender.
She calls us back to our truest identities as
men and women: «The Hebrew connotation is that the
creation of God's image bearers — a blessed male / female alliance with God at the center — is «emphatically,» or «exceedingly,» or «forcefully» good — the grand equivalent
of a
divine fist bump!»
In another closely related picture, Christ is the Word
of God, God's address to
man, the communication
of God's thought, the mode
of God's approach to his world, and, in accordance with the language
of contemporary philosophy, the embodiment
of that
divine reason which permeates the cosmos, or the intermediary
divine link between God and his creatures, the mode in which the transcendent God becomes immanent in the rational
creation.
Thus I should say that if the story
of Jesus» life had been told just as it seemed — and in a sense was — at the time it was occurring, that story would not have been adequately or truly told or that life was a part
of a supremely significant, a
divine event, the event through which God, the Creator and the Ruler
of all nature as well as the Lord
of history, was entering into
man's life with new redemptive power; but that fact was not grasped clearly, if at all, till the event had reached its culmination in the resurrection, the coming
of the Spirit, and the
creation of the community.
I consider religions — and all holy books — to be purely the
creation of men, by
men, and they are given claims that they are
divine in order to attempt to give these writings further authority.
Not only «our
creation, preservation, and all the blessings
of this life» come ultimately through God's working in the world — even when they come by way
of other
men or from nature, the chief (not the only, since created occasions have freedom to be causative agents) causal agency is the
divine Love.
We are reminded
of that first
divine breath given at the
creation of man out
of the dust
of the earth.
In the
creation story
of Genesis; God shaped
man out
of the dust
of the earth and animated him with
divine breath.
The
divine blessing
of procreation («Be fruitful and multiply») is spoken to the human male and female in Genesis 1:28, and Adam's rapturous little poem naming woman and
man in Genesis 2:23 (which I take to be the way Genesis 2 affirms that
creation is «very good») clearly aims at sexual union, as the
man is to leave father and mother and cleave to his woman, becoming one flesh with her (Gen. 2:24).
1:24), when he presents him as the medium
of creation (Col. 1: 16), when he mentions wisdom, understanding, and knowledge as
divine gifts to the believers, and when he formulates his doctrine
of the preexistent Christ who emptied himself to live among
men (Phil.
For since the
creation of the world God's invisible qualities — his eternal power and
divine nature — have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that
men are without excuse.
He departs from much pietistic tradition by making
Creation and
divine providence subservient to the evolutionary world process, rather than viewing God's activity as a sporadic set
of interventions designed to inform
man of some eternal truth or to keep him traveling the straight and narrow.
I am a God - fearing African - American female whom loves the
divine plan
of God that was established for
men and women since the beginning
of creation.