It calls for an end to all authoritarian models of truth, including, in my mind, the model of the ordained minister or priest, who inevitably stands in the same relationship to the laity as does
the divine image of God in Jesus to the followers of God.
I believe that Pagan holidays and pagan rituals and pagan beliefs, and all the old stories and tales and myths from pagan religions are actually the cry of
the divine image of God in man to return to what was lost.
In terms of gender, God's original design was for men and women as co-rulers, co-inheritors, and equally carriers of
the divine image of God.
Not exact matches
As humans created in the
image of God we are capable
of divine expression even in our pitiful fallen state; even the soldiers in World War 1 had a brief respite on Christmas and walked out
of the trenches to greet each other only to return to the trenches the next day and resume killing each other.
From this beginning came all that followed, so everything that is is related, woven into a seamless network, with life gradually emerging after billions
of years on this planet (and perhaps on others) and resulting in the incredibly complex, intricate universe we see today.32 To think
of God as the creator and continuing creator / sustainer
of this massive, breathtaking cosmic fact dwarfs all our traditional
images of divine transcendence — whether political or metaphysical.
A conception
of God as «in the world, or nowhere, creating continually in and around us,» as Whitehead put it toward the end
of his life, is the starting place for any viable revision
of the
divine image.
Irenaeus championed this understanding explicitly: «The Father
of all» [47] is no less than «He who is impassible» (Against Heresies, 2.12.1).30 For Clement
of Alexandria, this is true both for the nature
of God (Stromata, 2.16) and for the highest achievable good
of those who would truly embody the
divine image: «Endurance also itself forces its way to the
divine likeness, reaping as its fruit impassibility» (2.20).
For, as Caldecott highlights, the Catholic tendency, from Thomas Aquinas through to the contemporary Catechism (one might also add St Augustine and the 14th - century papal Encyclical Benedictus Deus) has been to emphasise that the human soul is not physical, but rather spiritual, in the
image of God's
divine nature, and directly created at conception.
[22] Once that
image of love was desecrated by sin, it had to be recast in the furnace
of divine love.The Incarnation marks the moment when the
image of the invisible
God became man, renewing man's
image in a new creation so that men might become in Him who they were forever intended to be in
God's eyes, the
image of the
God who is love (Eph.
For purposes
of brevity, let us simply take up the problem
of medieval painting and sculpture, and ask if
God -
images here play a significant role, and, more particularly, ask if we can here discover a significant relation between
God -
images and Christ -
images, a relation reflecting a uniquely Christian apprehension
of the evolutionary movement and transformation
of the
divine process.
This perspective makes the economic part
of human nature worthy
of a creature made with
divine generosity in
God's own
image.
But it is chiefly concerned to tell men what they may become in Christ, what indeed they already are in the
divine intention: sons
of God, made in his
image, fallen into sin by their willfulness, and now by the grace
of our Lord Jesus Christ able to be conformed to his likeness, the evil and the sin which they know so well being done away through
God's forgiving love shed abroad through him.
«35 Whitehead's position here opposes several strains
of thought combined in traditional theism: the
divine Caesars that lead to fashioning
God in the
image of an imperial ruler; the Hebrew prophets that lead to fashioning
God in the
image of moral energy; and Aristotle's «unmoved mover» that leads to the fashioning
of God in the
image of an ultimate metaphysical principle.
Process thinkers have rebelled against
images of God that depict the
divine as a despotic tyrant or as a cosmic puppeteer pulling the strings on the creaturely puppets.
When the
image of God entered into the species which is humankind, that species was ordained to find its order on a plane other than the animal, and because
of the presence
of that
divine image, dominance on the human plane is not a natural order but a disorder.
She became for me the perfect
image of the deep indwelling truth
of creation, the
divine Wisdom or Sophia who resides in the very heart
of the world, the stainless
image of God, the unfallen.
The former stresses man's dignity and greatness as the child
of God made in the
divine image while the latter stresses man's perpetual sinfulness and weakness.
By contrast, the perfection
of the androgynous
God of process thought consists in an ideal balance
of these contrasting traits, not in the total exclusion
of the traits this culture traditionally views as feminine, thus luring both human males and females to strive to create themselves in the
divine image.
At its worst, this notion takes the form
of the
image of God as
divine lawgiver and judge, who has proclaimed an arbitrary set
of moral rules, who keeps records
of offences, and who will punish offenders.
To think
of God as Love - in - act is to say that those who are «in the
divine image» are also intended by that
God to be themselves lovers - in - action.
Heidegger, for example, intimates that after our present imageless era — the era in which «
God is dead» — a new procession
of divine images may begin.
Each
of us is an «unfulfilled capacity,» made with and for a purpose — or, as our process conceptuality requires us to put it, «being made...» The Christian would say that we are thus being made toward the
image of God, to reflect, and personally (and socially) act for, the
divine Love; and the deepest intentionality in us is in the direction
of finding genuine fulfillment in fellowship with
God.
It is not surprising, therefore, that Jung speaks
of the integrated self as «indistinguishable from a
divine image» and
of self - realization as «the incarnation
of God.»
«
God» can not arise, only the
image of God, the idea
of God, and this also can not arise out
of the human but only out
of the meeting
of the
divine and the human.
The parables in Mark 4, based as they are in the context
of agriculture, make use
of several
images derived from nature and the
divine activity in the process
of nature, to speak
of the concept
of the Kingdom
of God.
To say that the Holy Spirit is
God, not anything man possesses, does not devalue the human spirit which bears the
image of its
divine origin.
He erroneously tries to dismiss the reference in Philippians 2:6 to Jesus being in «the form
of God» as a mistranslation
of «the
image of God,» ignoring both many parallels with the figure
of Wisdom in early Judaism and many other New Testament texts that speak to Jesus's pre-existent
divine state.
Such an understanding certainly leads us to expect a rational universe patterned on
divine wisdom and accessible to human beings made in the
image of God.
Her book Models
of God proposes three contemporary
images for the
divine:
God as Mother, Lover and Friend.
Process thinkers have rebelled against
images of God that depict the
divine as a despotic tyrant or as a cosmic puppeteer pulling the strings on creaturely puppets.
I shall then explore affinities between the process doctrine
of God and the
image of the
divine in the work
of Hauerwas.
To be
God — not just to share a spark
of the
divine, nor to be in
God's
image, nor to be a lesser
divine being like the angels, nor any
of the other possible subversions
of the orthodox doctrine, 2 but really to be
God — in any Christian understanding, this means to be eternal and unlimited, to be perfect in love and understanding.
For it is in our very being, created in
God's
image, to reflect the
divine grace
of God in our relationships.
In the remainder
of this chapter we shall isolate features that illustrate
divine persuasion drawn from the areas
of creation, providence, and biblical authority, reserving for the next chapter the difficult theme
of the interaction
of persuasive and coercive elements within the biblical
image of God as king.
According to Paul — and he shared this view with his Jewish contemporaries —
God had created man in his own
image, and man thus partook
of the
divine nature.
The corresponding
image of God as one who embraces this depth
of human shame as an aspect
of the
divine life amounts to nothing less than a metaphysical abolition
of all the alternative ideas
of God, most
of which lend sanction to our exclusivist heroics.
We now behold more clearly in the passion and crucifixion
of Jesus the illuminating and healing
image of a vulnerable, suffering
God who, out
of love for the world, renounces any claims to coercive omnipotence and gives the
divine self - hood over to the world in an act
of absolute self - abandonment.
God's righteousness is his justice, and his justice is manifest in his working to put down the unrighteous, expose idols, show mercy, and achieve reconciliation in a new order which expresses man s dignity as bearer
of the
divine image.
In the mujerista
God revindicates the
divine image and likeness
of women.
In the ancient Near Eastern world, kings were considered
divine image - bearers, appointed representatives
of God on earth.
The process - relational model
of God as the most extensive exemplification
of primordial creativity, with every worldly occasion in its own process
of becoming; the process - relational concept
of God as the principle
of order channeling the world's becoming toward ever richer and more harmonious experience (the primordial nature); and the process - relational concept
of God's preservation
of every worldly occasion in
God's own everlasting becoming (the consequent nature), with each such occasion evaluated and positioned for its greatest possible contribution to the
divine life — these perspectives on
divine reality which process - relational thought claims to find exemplified in the very nature
of things are separately and together congruent with and supportive
of the biblical
images and events which describe the «already» in inaugurated eschatology.»
She calls us back to our truest identities as men and women: «The Hebrew connotation is that the creation
of God's
image bearers — a blessed male / female alliance with
God at the center — is «emphatically,» or «exceedingly,» or «forcefully» good — the grand equivalent
of a
divine fist bump!»
You are the Devil's gateway; you are the unsealer
of that tree; you are the first forsaker
of the
divine law; you are the one who persuaded him whom the Devil was not brave enough to approach; you so lightly crushed the
image of God, the man Adam; because
of your punishment, that is, death, even the Son
of God had to die.
And its end or goal is that men and women shall realize and be enabled to express their
God - intended potentialities as they are being «made toward the
image of God,» in cooperation with and sharing in the
divine Love.
Each
divine occasion (if, as I hold,
God is better conceived as a living person rather than a single actual entity) must receive its being from its predecessors, and I can
image no beginning
of such a series.
There are three levels at which the issue must be confronted: at the trinitarian level,
of the internal relationship between the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit; at the Christological level, regarding Jesus Christ who was born true
God and true man; and at the anthropological level, about males and females created in the
divine image.
From considering her, I gain another glimpse into the
image of God as parent: not an omnipotent authoritarian, sternly demanding one set
of behaviors for acceptance or salvation, but rather a «
divine persuader» who enhances life, creativity, attainment
of the good in all its myriad
of forms.
Into this inherited framework, however, Jesus was introduced as the essential portrait
of the
divine nature, the very «
image of God.»
There is no question but that this
image of God as king poses serious difficulties for process theism, for it not only highlights elements
of divine coercion but offers a coherent account
of their presence.
Every death
of a
divine image is a realization
of the kenotic movement, an actualization in consciousness and experience
of God's death in Christ; thus a fully incarnate Christ will have dissolved or reversed all sacred
images by the very finality
of his movement into flesh.