In a blog post entitled, «The Tornado, The Lutherans, and Homosexuality,» Piper confidently proclaims that the tornado that hit downtown Minneapolis yesterday was a result of
divine judgment on a group of Lutherans meeting in a local church to discuss, among other things, a «social statement» that could make it easier for the church to accept homosexual unions.
Whether he dealt with women, children, or slaves, whether the persons in need were Jew, Roman, Syro - Phoenician, or Samaritan, whether he associated with «respectable» people or social outcasts, whether he was illustrating true neighborliness by the story of the good Samaritan or declaring the principle of
divine judgment on the basis of «as you did it to one of the least of these my brethren» — all persons were of equal and supreme worth to him because he saw them through the eyes of God.
Not exact matches
It is based, instead,
on the
judgment that the
divine satisfaction must be very much like creaturely ones,
on the one hand, and that the Hartshornean move creates additional problems,
on the other.
The conventional literary - critical
judgment that the following verses (17 - 19) were not part of the original unit is doubtless correct, but the standard critical conclusions
on vs. 16 — fragmentary, a corrupt text, distorted in transmission, et cetera — result from the failure to recognize the difference in form and the functional relationship between Scheltrede and Drohwort, the deliberated and composed invective called forth by the received Word, the
divine threat or
judgment.
Second, these children and infants were expressly judged and executed for the acts of their parents in direct contradiction of the basic Christian tenet of
divine judgment based
on an exercise of free will to choose evil or reject god.
Jerry Falwell saw it as a
divine judgment and blamed it
on the presence of «the abortionists, the feminists and the gays and the lesbians».
The experienced fact of human sinfulness and the promise of salvation through the unmerited forgiveness of sin have placed much emphasis
on divine judgment in traditional Christian thinking.
The overflowing and,
on our part, unmerited, love of God forgives our sin even though we still stand under the
divine judgment, and the love of God for us enables us to love our neighbor.
It is, furthermore, too much disposed in its doctrine of
divine judgment to spread the doom
on thick without adequate recognition of God's saving grace or of the concrete works of love which man not only can but must do if he is to be God's servant in fashioning a better world.
by the
divine messengers, who offered them salvation from the impending
judgment on Sodom.
In the words of the First Vatican Council's Dogmatic Constitution
on the Catholic Faith, the «
divine deposit» includes «all those things are to be believed by
divine and Catholic faith which are contained in the Word of God as founding Scripture or Tradition, and which are proposed by the Church as matters to be believed as divinely revealed, whether by her solemn
judgment or in her ordinary and universal magisterium.»
Ok, can I have that little chat with Jesus, but still keep my better
judgment based
on my confidence in science and logic, which suggests that he wasn't
divine, or do I have to trade in my better
judgment and just accept that Jesus was
divine on faith?
On the other hand, he said that the message of Billy Graham, despite its simple pietism and obscurantist framework of «The Bible says...,» has «preserved something of the biblical sense of a
divine judgment and mercy before which all human strivings and ambitions are convicted of guilt and reduced to their proper proportions.
In the form in which this coming kingdom was eventually delineated, as
divine victory and the final consummation of Christ's work
on earth in both
judgment and mercy, the biblical symbolism of Christ's return becomes meaningful.
Not sin, for it is thought of as a universal human attribute; nor forgiveness, for it is conceived as a mere event in the world of external objects,
on which man by his very theories and proofs exercises
judgment, asserting that
divine forgiveness can and must be thus and so.
(John 3:17) In so far as
divine judgment takes place, it is operative here and now, an inherent testing of life by its responses to opportunity, a constant interior arbitrament by which light shows up darkness — «He that believeth
on him is not judged: he that believeth not hath been judged already....
The man Amos, the prophet Amos, could not have spoken with such passion
on behalf of Yahweh except in the faith that the very historical
judgment which he proclaimed was itself ultimately positive and redemptive in
divine purpose.
We pronounce blessing
on those who believe as we do and
judgment on those who do not by the authority of God; but is that
divine authority the authority by which Jesus spoke and taught: We believe that God is always
on our side and not
on the side of other; but is it not possible that God of Jesus may sometimes be
on the side of other rather than
on our side?
Its emotional impact is shaped by the unique perspective of the narrator - a typical teenager telling the tale out of her own youthful concerns (having fun, her uncertain future), combining her beliefs about the dual contradictory nature of humanity («you just got half - devil and half - angel in ya»), and imaginative and fearsome fantasies of religious
judgment and
divine retribution (the flaming end of the world, and the Devil's presence
on Earth).