In this connection I would say that Anselm's «discovery» — he may have made more than one — is that
the divine nonexistence is not a real possibility because it contradicts the meaning of «God» properly understood.
For the believer «the heavens declare the glory of God,» but not even for the atheist can the heavens, or any observed realities, declare
the divine nonexistence.
Only the second would mean (if it means anything)
the divine nonexistence.
Not exact matches
The Zen enlightenment experience is a revelation of the full relationality of all that exists, and hence of the
nonexistence of any such selves, human or
divine.
It might be put as follows: «God does not exist, but not because some unfortunate accident incompatible with
divine existence has brought about God's
nonexistence or prevented God's existence.