Not exact matches
Elsewhere, I have indicated how this field - approach to Whiteheadian societies allows for a trinitarian understanding of God in which the three
divine persons of traditional Christian doctrine by their dynamic interrelatedness from moment to moment
constitute a structured field of activity for the whole of creation.6 Here I would only emphasize that thinking of Whiteheadian societies as aggregates of mini-entities with one entity providing the necessary unity for the entire group is reductively much more impersonal and materialistic than the approach sketched in these pages.
It is not as if matter has been invested with some
divine quality in its own right — that would indeed be a magical understanding — rather it is the dynamic, Spirit filled presence of the Christ in an enfleshed relationship with his
People that
constitutes the principle of sacramental life - giving empowerment.
Three separate
persons are needed to
constitute the
divine nature, i.e., the process of self - giving love; but it is the nature, not one of the
persons, that binds them together as a unique interpersonal process, hence as one God.
According to tradition, this is precisely the situation which prevails within the Trinity: the Father and the Son both love the same
divine Spirit with an infinite love, Hence it seems safe to conclude that no further
persons are needed to
constitute the
divine community.
That Jesus was fully human does mean that the actual occasions
constituting Jesus as a living
person were not in any instance the actual entity God or, if God is conceived as a living
person, the actual occasions
constituting the
divine life.
That which
constitutes existence in its concreteness and in its meaningfulness, that which invests it with what it is and ought to be, is called
divine by the religious
person.
To observe what the
people of the Old Testament shared with their varied religious environment in regard to the concept of
divine power
constitutes no more than a prelude to the full symphony of ideas yet to be encountered.
Israel was acquainted with the manifestations of God as his Spirit, but this did not suggest that God in his inner being
constituted one
divine person distinct from the Spirit of the Lord.