Sentences with phrase «divorce judge in this case»

As noted by the original divorce judge in this case, paternity was not necessarily determinative of child support obligations.

Not exact matches

In Arkansas, circuit judges like Maggio handle divorce cases, among other civil and criminal casework.

The court's own schedule (for instance, whether other cases are in trial or whether judges are on vacation) may also impact how long it takes to get a divorce.

Effect of Changing Judges During a Divorce in Arizona In Arizona, one judge usually hears a divorce case from start to Divorce in Arizona In Arizona, one judge usually hears a divorce case from start to finisin Arizona In Arizona, one judge usually hears a divorce case from start to finisIn Arizona, one judge usually hears a divorce case from start to divorce case from start to finish.

If you and your spouse are unable to agree on any issue in the divorce, then your divorce is considered contested and you'll be required a trial where a judge will decide the remaining issues in your case.

In the wake of the striking divorce case of Mrs and Mr Owens, BBC Radio Solent spoke to Debra Emery, Partner and Head of the Moore Blatch Family department about the implications of Judge Robin Tolson QC refusing Mrs Tini Owens application for divorce on the grounds of unreasonable behaviour at the Family Court sitting at Oxford last year.

The Virginia Court of Appeals remanded the case to the trial judge to enter a divorce based on living separate and apart for a year, instead of the fault ground of constructive desertion in favor of the wife.

However, the opinions of a business owner regarding the value of his or her company are typically given very little weight by most judges because of the inherent bias of the business owner to understate the real value of the business in a divorce case.

The lesson of the Gordon case is that divorce trial judges have a great deal of discretion in Virginia, and you take your chances when you try a divorce case.

In this case, the Virginia Court of Appeals found evidence in the record of husband's egregious conduct toward wife, thus justifying the divorce court judge's ruling that husband was not entitled to spousal supporIn this case, the Virginia Court of Appeals found evidence in the record of husband's egregious conduct toward wife, thus justifying the divorce court judge's ruling that husband was not entitled to spousal supporin the record of husband's egregious conduct toward wife, thus justifying the divorce court judge's ruling that husband was not entitled to spousal support.

The divorce court judge permitted wife to reopen her case to call her corroborating witness, who she argued was not previously called due to an inadvertent mistake, even though the witness had been present in the courtroom.

In 1979, Judge Weant began his decision in a family law case by observing that «The basis for this argle - bargle was laid with the filing of a decree of divorce....&raquIn 1979, Judge Weant began his decision in a family law case by observing that «The basis for this argle - bargle was laid with the filing of a decree of divorce....&raquin a family law case by observing that «The basis for this argle - bargle was laid with the filing of a decree of divorce....»

If one reads the comments on the Charleston Post and Courier's web site regarding the Judicial Merit Selection Commission's preliminary decision that Judge F.P. Segars - Andrews is unqualified to remain a family court judge because of her handling of a divorce case in which there was a business relationship between her husband's law partner and one -LSBJudge F.P. Segars - Andrews is unqualified to remain a family court judge because of her handling of a divorce case in which there was a business relationship between her husband's law partner and one -LSBjudge because of her handling of a divorce case in which there was a business relationship between her husband's law partner and one -LSB-...]

A High Court judge asked to decide what the public can be told about a divorce money fight involving rock star Liam Gallagher and ex-wife Nicole Appleton says the law relating to the reporting of such cases is in a «chaotic» state.

Japanese judges also demonstrate a clear bias toward awarding their citizens full custody in international divorce cases, he said.

Judge Altenbernd later relayed to Mr. Cordover that he supports the collaborative process, especially in divorce cases where issues of child custody and parenting plans are involved.»

Sometimes judges do sign their Minute Entries in which case that is a final order and your divorce has been finalized.

In cases where a couple can not agree on the terms of their divorce, the matter must be litigated in court before a family law judgIn cases where a couple can not agree on the terms of their divorce, the matter must be litigated in court before a family law judgin court before a family law judge.

In May of this year, Florida Judge Linda Schoonover chose to resign from the bench in light of a series of misconduct allegations, including a claim she retaliated against a party in a divorce case who had refused a Facebook friend request sent by the judge during the course of the triaIn May of this year, Florida Judge Linda Schoonover chose to resign from the bench in light of a series of misconduct allegations, including a claim she retaliated against a party in a divorce case who had refused a Facebook friend request sent by the judge during the course of the tJudge Linda Schoonover chose to resign from the bench in light of a series of misconduct allegations, including a claim she retaliated against a party in a divorce case who had refused a Facebook friend request sent by the judge during the course of the triain light of a series of misconduct allegations, including a claim she retaliated against a party in a divorce case who had refused a Facebook friend request sent by the judge during the course of the triain a divorce case who had refused a Facebook friend request sent by the judge during the course of the tjudge during the course of the trial.

In cases of divorce by judicial decree, reconciliation must first be attempted by the judge.

Divorce costs have been in the news recently with a senior Judge describing costs of # 920,000 in the recent case of J v J [2014] EWHC 2654 (Fam) as «eye - watering» and «grotesque» but while the scale of costs in the particular case is worthy of comment, the issue of proportionality is something that has troubled the family courts for many years.

They are «taken into account» and may be a significant factor in a divorce case to the extent that the English judge feels that it is proper to do so, depending on the circumstances of the case.It also means that if a prenuptial agreement is renegotiated and revised after the parties marry, it will likely be enforced.

In a divorce action, a circuit court judge has the discretion to sign a TRO as part of a case in order to prevent one of the parties from carrying out certain actions or behaving in a specific manneIn a divorce action, a circuit court judge has the discretion to sign a TRO as part of a case in order to prevent one of the parties from carrying out certain actions or behaving in a specific mannein order to prevent one of the parties from carrying out certain actions or behaving in a specific mannein a specific manner.

When the judge decides all of the issues in the case, he or she will issue a final order of divorce, also known as a divorce decree.

In fact, some Alabama judges actually order mediation before they will hear divorce cases.

The Reno Gazette - Journal today provides extensive coverage: «Police link judge shooting with homicide; suspect still missing ``; «Violence a key topic when judges gather ``; «Judge wants bulletproof windows; officials study tinted films, cite cost ``; «Weller handled hundreds of cases involving divorce ``; «Wedding party mistakes «pop» for champagne cork ``; «Potential violence surrounds family court cases, lawyers say ``; «Downtown restaurant in middle of action ``; and «Police continue search for shooting suspect.&rjudge shooting with homicide; suspect still missing ``; «Violence a key topic when judges gather ``; «Judge wants bulletproof windows; officials study tinted films, cite cost ``; «Weller handled hundreds of cases involving divorce ``; «Wedding party mistakes «pop» for champagne cork ``; «Potential violence surrounds family court cases, lawyers say ``; «Downtown restaurant in middle of action ``; and «Police continue search for shooting suspect.&rJudge wants bulletproof windows; officials study tinted films, cite cost ``; «Weller handled hundreds of cases involving divorce ``; «Wedding party mistakes «pop» for champagne cork ``; «Potential violence surrounds family court cases, lawyers say ``; «Downtown restaurant in middle of action ``; and «Police continue search for shooting suspect.»

Judges are now using internet visitation in routine divorce cases rather than only in relocation cases.

In Alabama, family law judges have to make an «equitable» division of property in divorce caseIn Alabama, family law judges have to make an «equitable» division of property in divorce casein divorce cases.

Bad news for the disgruntled divorce client in the case reported on here Nov. 17: a state appellate court has ordered San Francisco Superior Court Judge Ronald Quidachay to reconsider his ruling allowing the client to claim emotional distress damages over the attorney's alleged mishandling of his divorce (which the attorney denies).

Divorce costs have been in the news recently with a senior Judge describing costs of # 920, 000 in the recent case of J v J [2014] EWHC 2654 (Fam) as «eye - watering» and «grotesque» but while the scale of costs in the...

If the couple decides to divorce, in most cases, the judge will incorporate the terms of the separation agreement into the judgment of divorce.

In that case, the court noted that the judge had placed no weight on the impact that a divorce might have on the wife's coverage under the husband's insurance policies and noted that this is a fact - specific exercise:

Assistant judges may also sit with the presiding judge in select cases, such as divorces.

But remember, communication between couples is always a two way street (i.e., it involves you both) so if one person is unable or unwilling to communicate then this may be an indication that either a) the one who wishes to improve their own communication skill can work on that with their own individual professional (such as a divorce coach) or b) the couples who can not both agree to communicate with one another may need a third - party decision maker (such as an arbitrator or, in the worse case, a judge).

While these items come up in every divorce case, it is possible to determine the likelihood of being awarded child support or alimony based on the basics that family judges use to make these awards.

In these cases, where one spouse is being uncooperative, a judge can decide on the divorce through a default judgement, thereby ending the marriage without the other spouse's involvement.

Back in June, seven judges of the Supreme Court heard the cases of two divorced women, Alison Sharland and Varsha Gohil.

Prior to becoming a judge, Attorney Colin had an extraordinary amount of trial and mediation experience throughout the state of Connecticut in complex child custody and financial divorce related matters including in many high profile cases involving individuals and their spouses in the entertainment, sports, medical, legal and finance industries.

In most cases, arguing your divorce before a judge requires considerably more legal resources, as the case will need to be researched, mental health experts and forensics investigators may be called on to testify, and pleadings will need to be drafted.

In the Virginia Circuit Court case of Penza v. Penza, Case No: CL07 - 92, in the Circuit Court of Rappahannock County, the divorce court judge held that the accrued rent that was kept by the husband, who was not occupying the property and did not intend to retain it, was waste of a joint asseIn the Virginia Circuit Court case of Penza v. Penza, Case No: CL07 - 92, in the Circuit Court of Rappahannock County, the divorce court judge held that the accrued rent that was kept by the husband, who was not occupying the property and did not intend to retain it, was waste of a joint ascase of Penza v. Penza, Case No: CL07 - 92, in the Circuit Court of Rappahannock County, the divorce court judge held that the accrued rent that was kept by the husband, who was not occupying the property and did not intend to retain it, was waste of a joint asCase No: CL07 - 92, in the Circuit Court of Rappahannock County, the divorce court judge held that the accrued rent that was kept by the husband, who was not occupying the property and did not intend to retain it, was waste of a joint assein the Circuit Court of Rappahannock County, the divorce court judge held that the accrued rent that was kept by the husband, who was not occupying the property and did not intend to retain it, was waste of a joint asset.

Discussing the actual specifics of the terms of the life insurance request in a divorce should always be left to the Lawyers and the Judge involved the divorce case.

In the case of divorce, a judge may elevate the status of an ex-spouse to an irrevocable beneficiary in a life insurance contract to replace alimony he would not receive in the event of his ex-wife's death, for instancIn the case of divorce, a judge may elevate the status of an ex-spouse to an irrevocable beneficiary in a life insurance contract to replace alimony he would not receive in the event of his ex-wife's death, for instancin a life insurance contract to replace alimony he would not receive in the event of his ex-wife's death, for instancin the event of his ex-wife's death, for instance.

The way the parties and professionals interact with one another is radically different, the way information is gathered and assessed are different, and the way clients work together (with advice) to make solid decisions in their divorce that takes into account all of the legal, emotional, and financial elements in the divorce is a far cry from putting on a case at trial and asking the Judge to make all of the decisions.

In litigation, by contrast, all parties and their attorneys have to do is put on their «best case» for the Judge where each party asks for all of the things he or she wants in the divorce and argues for why they should each have what they want, even over the objection of their spousIn litigation, by contrast, all parties and their attorneys have to do is put on their «best case» for the Judge where each party asks for all of the things he or she wants in the divorce and argues for why they should each have what they want, even over the objection of their spousin the divorce and argues for why they should each have what they want, even over the objection of their spouse.

Sadly, many (but certainly not all) divorce attorneys approach essentially all divorcing couples assuming the parties are in an extreme state of conflict and need the attorney to take over the case and make decisions for them (or work through the courts for the judge to make all of the decisions).

In some states, a judge has the option of referring part of a divorce case to a magistrate.

The court won't allow your divorce to hang in limbo while you make up your mind, so the judge schedules this date to make sure your case is resolved one way or the other in the foreseeable future.

After the Notice of Divorce Proceeding has been published, the Petitioner files either a Decree [No Child (ren)-RSB-[Service by Publication], DC 6:6 (6) or a Decree [Child (ren)-RSB-[Service by Publication], DC 6:6 (7), whichever is applicable, which, when signed by the judge, ends the marriage, but does not divide property, nor order child support (in the Case of a DC 6:6 (7)-RRB-.

If you filed for divorce in Texas but the other party refuses to sign the final decree of divorce, you may set the case for trial and ask the judge to make decisions about the property division, custody of the children, child support and other issues.

When and if the case moves on to litigation, judges are faced with tough dilemmas in divorce cases, where they have to sometimes make Solomon - like decisions in child custody cases, or surgically and unemotionally divide the equities and split the assets of a couple without an understanding of what is really emotionally crucial to whom.