Sentences with phrase «divorce litigation so»

Not exact matches

Litigation is one reason why divorces can be so expensive.

While the Young case is hopefully an outlier, it should be instructive of the dangers of unfettered litigation financing in something so contentious as a divorce.

The plaintiff's instructions were that the divorce litigation should be settled so that the wife was not left destitute, and not to cause distress to their child.

The Collaborative Divorce model offers more privacy generally and more creative methods of dealing with confidentiality and privacy than the litigation model because it was designed to be so.

The professionals who make up MilleniumDivorce.com have 30 years of collective experience in divorce mediation, help, litigation, and negotiation that has been put to work on this site so that you can assist yourself in moving through the divorce process quickly, and with as much divorce information as possible.

Collaborative Divorce works to streamline and tailor the divorce process so that the clients» specific needs and goals are addressed for significantly less than the cost of divorce litiDivorce works to streamline and tailor the divorce process so that the clients» specific needs and goals are addressed for significantly less than the cost of divorce litidivorce process so that the clients» specific needs and goals are addressed for significantly less than the cost of divorce litidivorce litigation.

If you can not afford an attorney and your spouse is financially able to provide funds for an attorney, we can request that the court award attorneys fees and litigation costs during the course of the divorce, so that you may fund your case.

I am so happy that I did not follow the litigation style of divorce.

Litigation is a time - consuming series of steps that includes asking the court for temporary orders, discovery to determine the facts of your case, pretrial conferences and a trial so a judge can rule on your divorce.

This is particularly true in divorce litigation when so much is at stake — assets you've spent years working for or custody of your children.

I have been handling divorce cases either through litigation or mediation for over 30 years and I have been privy to so many incorrect rumors or «myths» about mediation.

She was with me when I was still accepting litigation work, and so she saw the toll that lengthy, nasty court battles had on divorcing spouses and their children.

Divorce litigation means taking your spouse to court and asking a judge to enforce your rights so that you can (presumably) get justice.

The Collaborative Family Law Council of Wisconsin is a non-profit organization dedicated to addressing divorce needs in a positive and cooperative manner so as to resolve conflict, avoid litigation, and help people restructure their lives to benefit all family members during and after the divorce.

In this blog, I will go through a side by side comparison of divorce mediation vs. the more traditional route of litigation from a more emotional perspective so you can really understand the differences between the two.

At a high level, one of the main reasons Collaborative Divorce works for so many families is the way in which it actively seeks to minimize and manage this type of anxiety that is endemic to litigation.

When I look back at my personal experiences related to divorce, it pains me to see people spend so much time and effort in divorce litigation.

The divorce litigation process is very adversarial and is geared to amassing information to benefit your side while weakening the opposing side so that a judge will rule in your favor after a trial is conducted.

Many divorce lawyers and many more of their clients have some reservations about the litigation system, but, so far, the organized Bar has shown little interest in proposals for serious changes.

As your divorce attorneys, we help you with the initial planning for your divorce, so that you enter into negotiations or litigation with your eyes wide open.

«It was not so long ago that the only accepted approach to divorce was the traditional litigation model.

For us, litigation was a last resort option, so it was a relief to find that collaborative divorce was available.

So far from these topics being off - limits, any MHP seeking appointment in a court case needs to fully inform the parties prior to their consent [123], of information about the following kinds of potentials for bias and agenda: whether the MHP has been married or divorced, and how many times, and under what kinds of circumstances, and how the MHP currently feels about those events; whether, if divorced, the MHP went through litigation over custody or property, and such details as whether the MHP had problems paying or receiving child support, as well as the custody arrangements of the MHP's own children and how these worked out and everyone's feelings about them; the MHP's own personal experience taking care of and spending time with children, within and without the scope of «parenting», and with regard to parenting, whether that was parenting as a primary caregiver, married or single parent, with or without household and third party help, or as a working parent or stay - home parent, and for how many children, and for how long, and the outcomes from all of that; i.e. how much time has this person actually spent caring for children on his or her own, and how well did this person's own family systems function, and is this person in fact an «expert» in creating a functioning family and raising happy, healthy, successful children with good outcomes, nay «best» outcomes, thoroughly well - adjusted and having reached the very pinnacles of their innate potential.

In deciding to seek the CDFA ™ certification, I did not do so to serve in the traditional role of a CDFA ™, either in the litigation or collaborative divorce process.

So Collaborative Divorce has several advantages over litigation as a process of resolving marital dissolution.

«There are so many divorce options: litigation, mediation, Collaborative Ddivorce options: litigation, mediation, Collaborative DivorceDivorce.

Collaborative divorce excels in places that litigation fails, primarily in the areas of empowering both spouses and removing the adversarial element so common in divorces.

Collaborative divorce goes a step further than even mediation by putting so much emphasis on cooperation that the lawyers must resign if their clients choose litigation.

• In terms of using Trusts to reduce Estate Duty, Capital Gains Tax, Executors Fees and other related costs upon death — this would remain intact (unaffected) • In terms of using Trusts to provide for a virtually seamless transition of wealth upon death to the next generation by avoiding frozen Estate issues and bureaucratic delays — this would remain intact (unaffected) • In terms of using Trusts to reduce exposure to asset loss through litigation / divorce and so on — this would remain intact (unaffected) • In terms of using Trusts to reduce Income Tax using the «Conduit Principle» — this would not be possible any longer, but there are several other methods that can be used to reduce Income Tax.