Sentences with phrase «divorcing parties feel»

Not exact matches

The special procedure list remains intact although there are those who feel that it makes liberation from marriage just too causal and too easy and that, since the parties generally strain themselves to turn up for their wedding ceremony, the divorce petitioner might reasonably be required to strain himself to give live evidence in support of his petition.

They are «taken into account» and may be a significant factor in a divorce case to the extent that the English judge feels that it is proper to do so, depending on the circumstances of the case.It also means that if a prenuptial agreement is renegotiated and revised after the parties marry, it will likely be enforced.

I would encourage parties to look at collaborative law as a process, prior to filing the complaint of divorce because it enables them to move into the divorce process more as a team effort than feeling that one party is getting the hammer of litigation hanging over them.

The collaborative process is an increasingly popular way to go about divorce proceedings to settle these matters outside of a courtroom, and can make both parties feel better overall about the entire process.

This can be difficult as divorce / separation is a frustrating time for most parties and many want to feel accepted, agreed with, vindicated, and that someone knows their pain.

She suggests in cases of extreme conflict between parties, parents should vent with friends, family members, a therapist, their lawyer or divorce coach and refrain from talking to the children about their frustration or feelings towards the other parent so that children don't hear anything that is critical of the other parent.

The environment in this type of divorce is win - win; meaning, the objective is for both spouses to part ways feeling the divorce settlement was fair for both parties.

The initiator of the divorce feels fear, relief, impatience, resentment, guilt, doubt and the other party feels betrayed, losing control, victimized, low self esteem, insecure, angry and tries to «get even» with the initiator.

In both mediation and collaborative divorce, there is the potential that the parties may fail to come to an agreement; however, more often than not, a couple who commits to this type of negotiation experience success with these methods, feeling more confident in their agreement, happier in the results and having spent less in legal fees.

Statistics show that parties who mediate spend less money on their divorce, feel vested in the settlement, are far less likely to engage in litigation in the future, and enjoy a healthier relationship.

For divorce mediation to be effective, the parties have to voice their feelings and concerns.

The goal of every divorce mediator is to assist the parties in creating an Agreement that they both feel is fair and of course, is enforceable in court if need be.

On a different but related note, one of the reasons Collaborative Divorce does in fact work so well for so many clients is the way the process includes both neutral professionals (to help keep the case from feeling like an us versus them exercise) as well as non-neutral advocates for the parties.

A previous post on this blog explained in some detail the role of the collaborative divorce coach, but I want to emphasize here that the whole team, including the attorneys, parties, and neutral professionals, should always keep their eye on the ball that these non-tangible factors, which we often label collectively with the term «interests,» must be tended to throughout the collaborative divorce process to maximize the chances of the case staying on track and ending up with a settlement that feels good enough to both parties.

Having solid (but flexible) legal advocates who are aligned with only one party, helps the parties feel grounded in the divorce by virtue of having a clear ally, without feeling polarized from their spouse.

It's the concept that you were partners — even if not good ones — throughout your marriage and you should be able to end it together as well, deciding how to split assets and how the co-parenting should work out in a way in which neither party feels too disappointed when it comes time to sign the divorce papers.

The CD can help the parties prepare for each meeting in the collaborative divorce process by prioritizing the issues and discussing ways to address concerns and feelings in the meetings.

In my work as a divorce lawyer and mediator, parties often comment the requirement to take a parenting class because they are divorcing makes them feel like they are viewed as bad parents.

I would encourage parties to look at collaborative law as a process, prior to filing the complaint of divorce because it enables them to move into the divorce process more as a team effort than feeling that one party is getting the hammer of litigation hanging over them.

Instead of hailing the divorce party trend as a healthy way to cope with the emotional effects of divorce, taking a more holistic approach to addressing emotional needs and feelings of sadness, betrayal, and grief is a more effective solution to minimizing the effects of divorce.

In some cases, divorce has been discussed and one of the parties feels that it is the best or only alternative.

The Divorce Coach helps each party cope with their feelings and associated struggles emanating from the separation and dissolution of the marital relationship.

But in the end, a monetary acknowledgement of the betrayal was included in the settlement and both parties divorced feeling financially secure and honoring the good marriage they had before it began to dissolve.

Divorce coaches, who get to know the parties and witness their interaction in the meetings, can gently elicit from the parties feelings that could fester if buried.

As reported in U.S. News & World Report, Collaborative Divorce embraces the concept that a couple once considered themselves partners during their marriage, and should be able to end it together as well, deciding how to split assets and how the co-parenting should work out in a way in which neither party feels too disappointed when it comes time to sign the divorce Divorce embraces the concept that a couple once considered themselves partners during their marriage, and should be able to end it together as well, deciding how to split assets and how the co-parenting should work out in a way in which neither party feels too disappointed when it comes time to sign the divorce divorce papers.

So far from these topics being off - limits, any MHP seeking appointment in a court case needs to fully inform the parties prior to their consent [123], of information about the following kinds of potentials for bias and agenda: whether the MHP has been married or divorced, and how many times, and under what kinds of circumstances, and how the MHP currently feels about those events; whether, if divorced, the MHP went through litigation over custody or property, and such details as whether the MHP had problems paying or receiving child support, as well as the custody arrangements of the MHP's own children and how these worked out and everyone's feelings about them; the MHP's own personal experience taking care of and spending time with children, within and without the scope of «parenting», and with regard to parenting, whether that was parenting as a primary caregiver, married or single parent, with or without household and third party help, or as a working parent or stay - home parent, and for how many children, and for how long, and the outcomes from all of that; i.e. how much time has this person actually spent caring for children on his or her own, and how well did this person's own family systems function, and is this person in fact an «expert» in creating a functioning family and raising happy, healthy, successful children with good outcomes, nay «best» outcomes, thoroughly well - adjusted and having reached the very pinnacles of their innate potential.

However, many feel the courts or legislature have missed an opportunity to implement a broader and statewide uniform policy not requiring savvy and special efforts to protect basic privacy information of Colorado divorcing parties.