Not exact matches
The defendant claimed that the plaintiff's allegation that «something»
caused her to fall was insufficient to establish that it was the
divot in the photograph.
The defendant appealed, arguing that the defect was not reasonably foreseeable and that the plaintiff did not establish that the
divot was the
cause of her injuries.
The defendant also claimed that the plaintiff presented insufficient evidence to prove that the
divot was what actually
caused her fall.