After some sit - ups, I end up on my back, looking up at the Catalonian Open — a second - round rerun - where
divots fall to a blue ground and return to a green sky.
Not exact matches
The court considered the fact that an independent witness noted that there were no other defects present in the area, that the plaintiff's description of her stubbing her toe on «something» was consistent with her theory that it was the
divot, and that the
divot's location was in the immediate area of where the plaintiff
fell.
The defendant claimed that the plaintiff's allegation that «something» caused her to
fall was insufficient to establish that it was the
divot in the photograph.
The defendant also claimed that the plaintiff presented insufficient evidence to prove that the
divot was what actually caused her
fall.