Sentences with phrase «do accept his time»

Not exact matches

The next time I needed to negotiate, I was able to talk to a lawyer, talk to a banker who is a friend of mine, and say OK, I don't want to accept this as it is.

I get girls messaging me all the time saying how I inspire them and made them want to get into racing and drifting when they didn't think they would be accepted... What people don't realise, is that the girls have knowledge of the products and teams they are promotion — that's part of the job.

«Thereby, the U.K. gets access to the financial markets of Europe, but at the same time the U.K. won't accept European citizens to go and work in the U.K. as they currently do freely.»

«If the audience doesn't accept it then it will be a long, long, long time before we can dream about that audience that I thought was there.»

«You are the most diverse class in Northeastern's history — in other words, you are Donald Trump's worst nightmare... I think that everything that we've lived and learned tells us that we will never come out on top if we accept advice from soundbite salesmen and carnival barkers who pretend the most powerful country on Earth can remain great by looking inward and hiding behind walls at a time that technology has made that impossible to do and unwise to even attempt.

Open - book management doesn't cause someone to accept less money; it just enables both the company and employee to get more out of their time together.

I have behaved insensitively at times, and I accept responsibility for that, though I do not believe that all of these allegations are accurate.

BlueGrace Logistics founder Bobby Harris recommends that people don't accept a meeting unless the person who requested it has put forth a clear agenda and stated exactly how much time they will need.

I can not afford the time to consider whether to write an article for some blog or not, whether to do a free speech or not or whether to accept a dinner invitation or not.

Poloz's approach to now had been a series of gentle nudges; raising housing prices and record household debt as concerns, but at the same time accepting that buyers and their lenders likely knew what they were doing.

Even if one accepts that «Statistics Canada... are ferociously - and at times irritatingly - determined to protect the privacy of those whose information is stored in their data bases», that does not address the question of who has access to the information BEFORE it reaches the StatsCan database.

There are simply too many variables to consider, many of which can and will change by the time you do decide to accept that gold watch and retire.

but do places that accept non accredited investors like fundrise have less liquidity for longer periods of time?

Not because the BC Liberals won — political opponents have to accept that some times the other team had a superior campaign than your own, more ideas, a more effective leader or just did a better job.

With smaller - value retail payments — think of buying a coffee — consumers and institutions are willing to accept additional risk and do not face immediate time constraints for receiving money.

For people living in rural areas, where wait times for driverless Uber or any kind of public transit are completely unreasonable, yet don't have money to burn an extra $ 10k on their car to make it autonomous, will continue to buy old - fashioned human - driven cars with gas pedals and steering wheels long into the future — and will not accept not being able to drive their cars into cities.

Speaking in an interview with Cheddar, Christopher Slowe said that developers «didn't have time» to update the Coinbase API used to accept BTC payments.

At the time of writing (3/19/18), Stellarport does not accept deposits of fiat currency.

«We at Malekula farms via accepting bitcoin, look to attract and do attract the tech - savvy centric generation of investors and at the same time by accepting bitcoin transfer a portion of our farmland real estate, an existing wealth asset into an accepted and unrestrained international currency vehicle for exactly the same reasons.»

Accept the fact you don't deserve the higher returns they generate over longer periods of time and be content with that.

Well, yeah... and I mean if what someone is really trying to achieve with this is to reduce practices that in any way, shape or form could indicate that someone bears them or their faith ill will... I don't think publicly humiliating people who would take the time to look up your dead ancestor's name and then take the time to drive to a temple and then get immersed in water on their behalf so that they (by their belief) have the option to accept your religion post mortem is really misguided and contrary to the spirit of freedom of religion in what it advocates.

Jesus did what he needed to do for then... but we need to do what we need to do for now, so we just have to move on with the times, tell everyone just how wonderful they are, and have a world class drama team, and maybe start an online church where you can click on a button to accept Christ.

Apology not accepted, they did this AFTER they apologized for baptizing Jews the last time and swore they'd only baptize dead Jews if the deceased direct descendant asked them too.

We accept that we don't know everything there is to know, but that He understands and will reveal to us what we need at the right time.

Kind of like what elite liberal socialists do all the time — trumpeting their atheism credentials to be accepted at their wine and cheese parties.

Actually there is historical proof that he was a healer and a miracle worker, but at that time it was an accepted profession and there were 1,000's of people that did the same thing.

Personally, I feel that if there is a god, and he wants me to believe he exists, he can come over here and tell me himself, I don't accept the Bible as «proof» of anything, because it is self - contradictory and appears to be heavily influenced by the governing culture of the time.

The Science behind the big bang has some gapping holes yet its put forward all the time to the public as the only other option is..., as well as Macro evolution but well we all know that they say its the only option... Could it be that science doesn't accept a concept of God from the outset so then the big bang and evolution are the only options.

«Incidents like this can happen to any one of us and at any time, and all we can do is to leave everything in God's hands and accept his will.»

What I refuse to do is accept some external force based on the mere stories of man, especially when those men a) never met b) lived in a time when stories were largely passed verbally and c) those stories have been shown to be wrong by studies that have been peer - reviewed.

Most atheists are open to natural explanations, but will, for the time being, accept «we don't know (yet)».

In a time in which the human body seemed to lose any iconic significance, in the weakness of his failing body, John Paul participated, as Cardinal Lustiger noted, in the suffering of his Redeemer, for the «mystery of salvation happens when Christ is on the cross and can not do or decide anything other than to accept the will of the Father.»

«Jews are stubborn,» he proclaimed to Times reporter Eric Konigsberg, adding, «Why did they persecute Jesus unless he knew something they didn't want to accept?»

Or, for those who do not like his solutions, the time has come to accept them as a challenge to come up with better ones.

Then there are the Bad Attitudes of the immature in faith: I have a hard time accepting myself; I feel overwhelmed by all the responsibilities and obligations I have; My life is filled with stress and anxiety; I tend to be critical of other people; I do not want churches getting involved in political issues; I do not understand how a loving God can allow so much pain and suffering in the world.

The rest of the time, the average Christian can do pretty well in their life simply by following a few generally accepted spiritual heath rules:

In his book In Praise of Play, Robert Neale discusses in detail these perversions of play: when peace is «inaction»; when freedom is bondage to one need in our psyche which is dominant; when delight is turned into a work agenda; when illusion is maintained at the expense of other needs and is a form of mental illness; when the story is believed, the time limits ignored, and pretending becomes pretension; when a game is played at the expense of others, breaking the rules; when the risk of adventure is perverted and the gamble removed or fatalistically accepted; or when play is done in secret.

If we are to speak truly to our age, therefore, we can assume, not (1) the complete ignorance of Christian principles, such as existed in the decaying civilization of early Greece and Rome; (2) the thoroughgoing knowledge and acceptance of Christian principles, such as existed in the time of most of our grandparents; or (3) the vigorous antagonism to the gospel, such as now exists among those who accept either the Marxist or the Fascist interpretation of history; but (4) a vague and tenuous residuum of Christian piety, devoid of any intention of doing anything about it.

At the same time, their very human nature and qualities make it easy for believers to accept what they say and imitate what they do.

The episode is reminiscent of a time in history when secular leaders did not accept a separation of Church and State.

It is at this level that the philosopher can not escape his perspective.5 He can, of course, reject a perspective that he may have at one time accepted, but he can do so only in favor of some other perspective.

In other words, those ministers who accept the sickness conception of alcoholism had had over three times the average yearly opportunities available to those who did not accept it.

Accepting and understanding his fears, while at the same time assuming that it must be done, is usually best.

Had you and your wife not opened your lives to me and accepted me at the time you did... I would have left the church completely... I had no where else to turn.

We can sum up what actually did become the way of Christian living in the ancient world by saying that the Christians lived in the economic, political and social orders of their time seeking new patterns but conforming to the general requirements of the common life, and accepting constituted authority except when it required idolatrous worship.

In short, anyone who appreciates the rapid change in historical circumstances and does not flee from this into a ghetto; anyone who knows that there is and always has been a mutable, human law of the Church, and that this kind of change has always been practised; anyone, moreover, who reflects that the Church not only has the right but the duty of shaping its canon law in accordance with changes in the times, will not be surprised at the change in many legal regulations which he is living through at the present time, but will recognize and accept this as a sign of the vitality of the Church and its pastoral care.

Gay pride means making sure that the next generation has an easier time in school than they did, having families more accepting of their sexual orientation and gender identity than families in the past.

Given that 20 % of congregants in the east London churches were recent converts to Christianity or had come back to faith, it's clear that church planting can and does lead to people accepting Christ for the first time.

Since I believe the bible is just a collection of writings by a random selection of authors written at widely varying times in history, not some divine revelation, I don't accept your basis for defining «sin.»

At the same time, he's saying we need to respect faith enough to understand that many people will rely solely on that for their views and we should accept that doing so is not necessarily a bad thing.