Sentences with phrase «do accept the teachings»

Not exact matches

I didn't do so well, but it taught me about being versatile and accepting the situation, and I was glad he did that.

How do we teach our team to drive hard, and to accept the occasional mistake in the service of increased speed?

As a devout Christian, I was always taught that non-Christians would go to hell because they did not accept Jesus Christ as their Lord and Saviour.

So no, based on the fact prostitution is not (a) accepted globally or (b) seems ethically horrible for the person doing it — I would say «no» to them teaching in the church.

While Evangelicals greatly respect the way in which the Catholic Church has defended many historic Christian teachings against relativizing and secularizing trends, and recognize the role of the present pontiff in that important task today, they believe that some aspects of Catholic doctrine are not biblically warranted, and they do not accept any claims of infallibility made for the magisterial teachings of popes or church councils.

No problem for Jesus it was where the disciples said it is better not to be married and Jesus said he who can accept this teaching should do it.

So when Paul (inspired to say) said «I do not permit a woman to teach, or exercise authority over a man» I accept that.

They do not believe that they still are but they still accept the teaching as being from God.

Traditional Christians believe in the Old and New Testaments, but unfortunately they don't accept that God brought forth Another Testament to help resolve all this conflict about the bible's teachings.

Now as a Christian I follow the new testament, and so striving to be Christ like as a Christian I accept everyone for who they are, I love them and do not presume to know the right way for them to live their life, instead I simply open my arms to others and know that all people of all faiths are just fine it doesn't matter to me what you do with your life all that matters is the way that you do it... that was my understanding of christs teachings anyways

However, while he did not accept Jesus» divinity, Lennon nevertheless considered Jesus the most important human being who ever lived, and considered Jesus» ministry the most important teachings ever taught.

It appeals to our pride to be considered more intellectual than those simple types who don't accept its esoteric teachings.

Do you accept Jesus» teaching about the vine?

For the faithful in Christ can not accept this view, which holds either that after Adam there existed men on this earth who did not receive their origin by natural generation from him, the first parent of all, or that Adam signifies some kind of multiple first parents; for it is by no means apparent how such an opinion can be reconciled with what the sources of revealed truth and the acts of the magisterium of the Church teach about original sin, which proceeds from a sin truly committed by one Adam, and which is transmitted to all by generation, and exists in each one as his own» -LCB- Humani Generis 37).

Rabbi Neuberger asserted that «it's really important that one accepts that... new scientific research has taught us... that the human embryo is not as unique as we thought before... We do have to think differently about the «unique quality of human embryos» in the way that Peter Saunders is saying... The miracle of creation... may have to be explained somewhat differently... Our human brains are given to us by God... to better the life of other human beings... and if this technology can do it..., and I don't believe that anybody is going to research beyond fourteen days, then so be it, lets do it.»

They teach their clients to do the same and then to substitute rational, self - accepting ideas for dealing with the inevitable frustrations, which occur in everyone's life in this very imperfect world.

The biggest cult is those that do not think about what the Master taught, which was not accepted then and I doubt if its accepted now.

On the whole, the new rites seem to have been widely accepted, though a tremendous amount of teaching needs to accompany them, and many ministers do not find themselves well equipped to perform this work.

Nevertheless, it is vital to accept the challenge of teaching the controversial aspects of the Catholic faith, while it is still legal to do so.

He or she might agree with some of the Bible's teachings if those things line up with his view of life, but he or she doesn't accept anything just because «it's in the Bible.»

It has never taught to hate gay people it has just taught that we don't agree with it and don't think it is right but are still accepting that everyone is different.

I certainly did not get the idea from those verses of anything like total depravity or that fallen man had to experience any kind of supernatural transformation of the will / heart in order to be able to accept God's convicting / convincing / persuading / call / drawing, instructions, teachings, commands, promises and gifts.

For example, if a denomination declared in their doctrinal statement that the Bible teaches that all good Christians must wear pink hats and only those people who wear pink hats can indeed be true followers of Jesus, we would conclude upon reading this statement that we would never be accepted by those folks because we don't agree with this bit of ridiculous theology.

Does it say in the bible that Christians are to teach the word / work of Christ Jesus and if they accept..

To discover what was distinctive about Jesus» teaching on church discipline, we have to ask what his hearers would have regarded as new — in other words, what was it that they didn't already know and accept?

Jeremy Myers, i think you are wrong and David is right, so many out there are preaching you can live any way you want and be right that Grace covers any sin, they really believe that, that is not what the bible says, God was very concerned about sin so much he sent Jesus his son to die on a cross for us, if we accept Jesus as our savor then we are to obey his commandments, not break them, we are to live a righteous and holy life as possible, the bible plainly list a whole list of things if we live in will not to to heaven unless we repent, if we die while in these sins, we will not go to heaven, what is the difference, between someone who said a prayer and someone who did not, and they are living the same way, none, i think, if we are truly saved it should be hard to do these things let alone live and do them everyday, i would be afraid to tell people that it does not matte grace covers their sins, i really think it is the slip ups that we are convicted of by the Holy Spirit and we ask for forgivness, how can anyones heart be right with God and they have sex all the time out of marriage, lie, break every commandment of God, i don't think this is meaning grace covers those sins, until they repent and ask for forgiveness, a lot of people will end up in hell because preachers teach Grace the wrong way,, and those preachers will answer to God for leading these people the wrong way, not saying you are one of them, but be careful, everything we teach or preach must line up with the word of God, God hates sin,

Leon went on to discuss how John the Baptist's heralding did not first go as expected but that it was a good thing because it taught people to accept reality.

Accept these five «cleansers» and we guarantee a complete recovery from your Islamic ways!!!! Unfortunately if you do, the koran teaches that you should be liquidated as an apostate.

«Do you support, affiliate with, or agree with any group or individual whose teachings or practices are contrary to or oppose those accepted by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter - day Saints?»

Brunner appeals explicitly to the prologue of John and to certain sayings of Paul, but surely one who is as emphatic as he in rejecting the authority of Scriptural teachings as such does not mean to say that we accept the doctrine of creation because of the presence of these passages in the New Testament.

You claim that your religious literature teaches this, failing to understand that your religious literature advocates a great many things you don't condone, nor would accept in a civilized society.

Some are, I regret to say, ex-Catholics who have deliberately chosen to join a non-Catholic denomination because they don't understand, or can't accept, or really disagree with, some aspect of Catholic teaching.

For many of us, it has been a source of irritation for some years that people who do not frequent the Sacraments, do not accept many basic teachings of the Church, and spend a great deal of time celebrating all this, should keep announcing that they are Catholics.

The Arminians have their particular bias, precedence, that initially fallen man did not have inherent - free - will capacity to accept or reject God's call / drawing, commands, instructions, teachings, promises and gifts that they interpret John 6:25 - 71 with — which interpretation is consistent with their precedence and consistent with their idea of universal prevenient grace that gave all of fallen mankind a free will capacity (at some time after the fall) to accept or reject God's call / drawing, commands, instructions, teachings, promises and gifts.

The ones I know do not accept many of the teachings of the Catholic church, but they go there to help others learn the truth of God's Word.

Therefore, one could conclude that those two verses are not talking about the capability of man's will to accept / believe, but about the fact that it is God that chooses, grants, teaches, calls and draws; and that is what God was doing through Christ speaking to this crowd of people — giving all of them in the crowd (Jn 3:16; 1 Jn 2:2; Jn 6:40) the opportunity to be taught by God (by Christ) to believe in Christ for salvation.

Is it possible and after reading about it i kept on thinking «i will sell to my soul for 20 carats get out shut up i will never ever sell my soul to you oh god please help me and this is continuing for a few days i am afraid that i have sold my sold to the devil have i please help and still i think god's way of allowing others to hate him us much worse even you know and can easily think think about much better punishments like rebirth after being punished for all the sins in life and i am feeling put on the sin of those who committed the unforgiviable sin (the early 0th century priests) imagine them burning in hell fire till now for 2000 years hopelessly screaming to god for help i can't belive the mercy of god are they forgiven even though commiting this sin keans going to hell for entinity thank you and congralutions i think the 7 year tribulation periodvis over in 18th century the great commect shooting and in 19th century the sun became dark for a day and moon was not visible on the earth but now satun has the domination over me those who don't belive in jesus crist i used to belive in him but now after knowing a lot in science it is getting harharder to belive in him even though i know that he exsists and i only belived in him not that he died for me in the cross and also not for eternal life and i still sin as much as i used to before but only a little reduced and i didn't accept satan as my master but what can i do because those who knowingly sin a lot and don't belive in jesus christ has to accept satan as their master because he only teaches us that even though he is evil he gives us complete freedom but thr followers of jesus and god only have freedom because they can sin only with in a limit and no more but recive their reward after their life in heaven but the followers of satun have to go to hell butbi don't want to go to hell and be ruled by the cruel tryant but still why didn't god destroy satun long way before and i think it was also Adam and eve's fault also they could have blamed satan and could have also get their punishment reduced but they didn't and today we are seeing the result

Unfortunately, many do not study the Bible to determine what the Bible teaches, but accept what is preached from the pulpit.

But even if the text is referring to a gay couple in bed, and even if the text does teach about the rapture, I pointed out to him that one of the men was taken in the rapture, which means that apparently, God accepted him.

As the Church does not accept sola scriptura as a valid argument for teachings and truth.

I don't think being gay has taught me this, but rather, I've always wanted to be willing to accept the parts of me that I can not change and still have the courage to accept grace.

All the more reason, therefore, to sustain substantive, reasoned moral teachings, even when society as a whole, and even Catholics, don't accept them.

It is quite staggering how many students do not understand some of the most simple doctrines and liturgical practices and, indeed, do not accept, or feel uncomfortable with the Church's teaching on moral issues.

If teachers of status, whether priests or layfolk, do not accept themselves and do not teach to others the doctrine of life and human goodness that Jesus taught on earth and still teaches in His Church, they will not form within others the true identity of the real, the living Jesus.

Did Jesus accept and teach that doctrine?

Jewish values won't accept sodomite couples raising children as parents, Jewish values will always keep what God has taught to be done; Jewish values go hand by hand with moral, with integrity, dignity, and solid principles, all of them given by God.

You assume one can't be enlightened because they don't blindly accept the faith they were taught via tradition.

It's a little hard to accept a man made god (s) or any of the teachings that were done by hand me down rumors.

A discussion I had with an evangelical the other day, in which said believer announced that he accepted the Biblical teaching, «God helps those who help themselves» (which incidentally doesn't appear in the Bible anywhere, btw) is a case in point.

AND And teaches us to say yes And allows us to be both - and And keeps us from either - or And teaches us to be patient and long suffering And is willing to wait for insight and integration And keeps us from dualistic thinking And does not divide the field of the moment And helps us to live in the always imperfect now And keeps us inclusive and compassionate toward everything And demands that our contemplation become action And insists that our action is also contemplative And heals our racism, our sexism, heterosexism, and our classism And keeps us from the false choice of liberal or conservative And allows us to critique both sides of things And allows us to enjoy both sides of things And is far beyond any one nation or political party And helps us face and accept our own dark side And allows us to ask for forgiveness and to apologize And is the mystery of paradox in all things And is the way of mercy And makes daily, practical love possible And does not trust love if it is not also justice And does not trust justice if it is not also love And is far beyond my religion versus your religion And allows us to be both distinct and yet united And is the very Mystery of Trinity