It is not uncommon for both sides of the case to
do accident reconstruction to prove their respective cases.
Not exact matches
«What we're going to
do is bring in an
accident reconstruction team.»
A retired auto
reconstruction service lead investigator for 12 years, Bill
did causative analysis on motor vehicle
accidents for attorneys and insurance companies.
Dental health care, however if injury to teeth is caused by an
accident, we
do cover the cost of extractions of damaged teeth and of
reconstruction of upper and lower canine teeth.
Accident reconstruction, witness reports, and police reports will all help determine the facts surround the
accident, but it is the deposition of the truck driver that will help determine liability and why the crash happened the way it
did.
When these
accidents happen, it may be necessary to hire an
accident reconstruction expert in order to prove the liability of the motorist who suddenly changed lanes when it was unsafe for him or her to
do so.
In order to
do this, you should request a copy of the police report, get witnesses» information, work with
accident reconstruction experts, and keep records of all medical reports and expenses.
It may be necessary to review vehicle computer data, surveillance footage that may have captured the
accident, eyewitness accounts, or even to employ the assistance of an
accident reconstruction expert in order to
do so.
In the case above involving the motor vehicle
accident, we may work with professionals in
accident reconstruction to prove that the other driver was texting and therefore didn't see that you had stopped in front of him or her, causing the driver to rear - end your vehicle.
But, there is a growing sentiment in car
accident cases that juries just don't listen to
accident reconstruction experts.
As a general rule, the police officer
did not see the
accident and so it's useful to know that a skilled personal injury attorney will have a number of
accident reconstruction experts to turn to and these people will have a lot more time than a police officer to really look at the skid marks, look at the vehicle damage and come to a conclusion as to speed, distance, etc..
They will
do everything they can — including hiring
accident reconstruction experts — to show that the
accident wasn't entirely the defendant's fault.
What most victims
do not realize is that there are various regulations and circumstances which involve Maryland truck
accident law, Federal Motor Carrier Safety regulations,
accident reconstruction, investigations, and ultimately the chain of liability of the
accident.
She
did not have an expert on on
accident reconstruction prepared to say «probably»; or, at least, Ms. Clements» lawyers could not find one that they were prepared to put on the stand.
Based on the evidence given by Mr. Richer and that of his passenger Mr. Moran, the GPS evidence, and the expert
accident reconstruction evidence that she accepted, the trial judge found that: i) Mr. Richer was operating the bus at a rate of speed in excess of the posted speed limit ii) critically, Mr. Richer
did not decelerate on his approach to the intersection; iii) the pre-impact speed of the bus exceeded 65.6 kilometres per hour after it entered the intersection; and iv) Mr. Richer was momentarily inattentive to the road ahead when he glanced left and then right, into the side mirrors of the City bus.