It pretty obvious to see how unnecessarily bias you are
against wind farms, especially because your so proclaimed bird killers don't even make up a single percent of annual birth deaths from human intervention.
If Goldacre really wants to stick his neck out, why doesn't he try arguing
against a rich, powerful, bullying Climate - Change establishment which includes all three British main political parties, the National Academy of Sciences, the Royal Society, the Prince of Wales, the Prime Minister, the President of the USA, the EU, the UN, most schools and universities, the BBC, most of the print media, the Australian Government, the New Zealand Government, CNBC, ABC, the New York Times, Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank, most of the rest of the City, the
wind farm industry, all the Big Oil companies, any number of rich charitable foundations, the Church of England and so on?
Mr Ridgway has found, in among the masses of evidence that indicate
wind farms do not cause significant declines in land values, one case that went
against the trend.
The few relatively minor problems that
wind farms cause should be balanced
against the huge problems that will arise if we
do not replace fossil fuel use with renewable energy such as
wind power.