Sentences with phrase «do anything in the real world»

Your religion can not be used to do anything in the real world in a realistic or effective way.

Not exact matches

He'd worked in the corporate world and had started several businesses — real estate, management consultant — none having anything to do with aviation.

ICOs still make lawmakers mad Congressman Brad Sherman, said that cryptocurrencies are «popular with guys who want to sit in their pajamas and tell their wives they're going to be millionaires,» adding that buying digital tokens doesn't finance anything in the real - world economy, but is «gambling on its value with no social benefit.»

My life may not have meaning, but if I try very hard, and do very well, it could have quite a lot of meaning, real meaning, that will be felt here in the real world, not in a possible reward in a realm that can't be proven to be anything other than imaginary.

... you can claim free will and by so cover all of the human actions done to the world but how can say that god is real and controls nature when nature has killed more purely innocent lives then anything in history ever... if god was just and comp@ssinate why send the wave that killed 300 thousand, why create the plague that killed nearly 75 million in the middle ages when nearly everyone was a VERY devout believer....

I do not mean, of course, to say anything so foolish as that language was not used for everyday things in the real world.

Of course, «churches,» not being taxpayers, don't have to pay for very much of anything in the «real» world.

If God exist in the real world, then yes I will need at least enough proof of it as anything else that exist in the real world, If, however, God does not exist in the real world then no proof is possible or necessary.

... you can claim free will and by so cover all of the human actions done to the world but how can say that god is real and controls nature when nature has killed more purely innocent lives then anything in history ever... if god was just and comp@ssinate why send the tsunami that killed 300 thousand, why create the plague that killed nearly 75 million in the middle ages when nearly everyone was a VERY devout believer....

You are not going to have anything like world - class or even close from 1 - 30, doesn't work and can't work in the real world.

Joining a club of arsenal s stature has its ups and downs.There is a requirement of how our players should perform when on the pitch.The following is a list of players who were wrong to choose arsenal.Aaron ramsey - Even though he is the most favoured of all players at the club now.I cant help but think how it would have gone for Him if he decided to search for other greener pastures.He was a clear talented footballer during his time at cardiff but he hasnt been raised with the discipline at arsenal.You can always see ramseys all round strengths but sadly Its not helping him or the club with his foward moving pleasurr.He is so Over used and its sometimes difficult for him to get used to the rythm of the game.With time you realise he gets low ib confidence and his engine gets wasted.He needed somebody who would have managed him properly and with care and that person is certainpy not wenger.You would have been better off at Manu mate.Calum chambers - Came us a very talented player from southampton with raw talent.He was very good at first but wenger found a way to reduce his level of confidence.His inexperience was left exposed and wenger did nt do anything to resolve that problem and instead He looked for other talented players.Alex oxlade chamberlain - Another very talented player who needed only his skilled sharpened and his character modelled.That and he was ready to become a world beater.But wenger decided to let him run and run like a headless chicken causing him to be often injured and damaging his confidence.Who knows what would have happened to him gad he decided to look for more greener pasture.He is surely a much better player than this.Theo walcott - Another player who was tipped to have a very bright future.He had it in him.But all he needed was an appropriate manager who would nurture him with discipline and help him with his talent.But on Coming to arsenal he was given Much more responsiblities putting more weight on his shoulders on top of that another player who was recklessly managed with his talent and never coming off age because his character wasnt properly shaped.Mesut ozil - Al right i agree he perfoms well just recently.But imagine all the legendary players he was often compared to during his time at real madrid.On coming to arsenal he found no rotation often overused, suffered many injuries and his confidence dwindled.It is pretty clear arsene does not take any responsibility for players.And when at arsenal you have to be your own manager.You need not rely on your manager otherwise you might continue being the same player for the next many years.That is why each and every player are what they are because of their own efforts and wenger had nothing to do with it.Van persie was the same player for over 7 years untill he himself decided to change.Wenger only organises and prepares tge team while the rest is in your court.It is not what so many people make it out to be.Thats why we need to pressure wenger more than our own players.They are their own self managers and wenger needs to take that responsibility

With BLW, babies are given «normal» food from the very get - go, cut into manageable, generally French fry - sized pieces, and therefore learning the tastes, textures, skills, and reflexes associated with food without first learning about purees (which let's be honest, does not exactly teach them anything about how we experience food in the real world).

Thank god after 43 year in labour I've walked away, because the people out side in the real world does not see many of the people within Labour as anything else as money seeking expenses grabbing pillocks.

How can they be sure that the model's output has anything to do with the real world — especially in cases such as nuclear disasters, which have no empirical data to go on?

But how does the artist hold our attention with an image that bears no likeness to anything in the real world?

When these types of isolated exercises are done, they don't really resemble anything that someone would do in the real world.

I had never really done anything in the online dating world but I had set up a real profile a few years back and didn't use it much aside from getting a few nice messages and decided it wasn't really for me.

Do they represent anything in the real world?

Ready Player One Rated PG - 13 for sequences of sci - fi action violence, bloody images, some suggestive material, partial nudity and language Rotten Tomatoes Score: 76 % In Theaters Based on the best - selling novel by Ernest Cline (and one of my favorite books in recent memory) Ready Player One explores a futuristic world where life in the real world is quite terrible, but people can escape into a virtual reality program called the OASIS, where they can be anyone and do anythinIn Theaters Based on the best - selling novel by Ernest Cline (and one of my favorite books in recent memory) Ready Player One explores a futuristic world where life in the real world is quite terrible, but people can escape into a virtual reality program called the OASIS, where they can be anyone and do anythinin recent memory) Ready Player One explores a futuristic world where life in the real world is quite terrible, but people can escape into a virtual reality program called the OASIS, where they can be anyone and do anythinin the real world is quite terrible, but people can escape into a virtual reality program called the OASIS, where they can be anyone and do anything.

Based on the best - selling novel by Ernest Cline (and one of my favorite books in recent memory) Ready Player One explores a futuristic world where life in the real world is quite terrible, but people can escape into a virtual reality program called the OASIS, where they can be anyone and do anything.

Frankly, if Fallen proves anything, it's that we don't live in the real world enough as it is.

In 2045, people escape the crowded, seemingly mundane real world to explore and play in this virtual world where they can be anyone and do anythinIn 2045, people escape the crowded, seemingly mundane real world to explore and play in this virtual world where they can be anyone and do anythinin this virtual world where they can be anyone and do anything.

The Biblical apocalypse really happens, and the filmmakers don't hold anything back in their depiction of how a handful of vainglorious actors with Hollywood power and insulation from the real world would handle the situation.

«If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything,» the wise, old Wise Man (Scott Glenn) tells his team of ass - kicking, sexualized cherubs before they enter into an imaginary battle that's meant to show how empowered they are in a fantasy - world escape from another fantasy world where men degrade them, which is, apparently, a step up from the real world where the men abuse them.

Since I don't believe them as legitimate characters who could exist in the real world, I didn't feel anything for them when the movie turns mushy and serious.

«Anything that would involve the same kind of knowledge and skills as doing it in the real world could prepare them to get the most out of the actual field trip,» he suggests.

This means that in the real world, OCR will be pushing for consent agreements binding districts where the only evidence that they did anything wrong will be statistical.

In sum, the fantasy of tech integration embraced mostly by librarians and tech integration specialists has little if anything to do with education in the real worlIn sum, the fantasy of tech integration embraced mostly by librarians and tech integration specialists has little if anything to do with education in the real worlin the real world.

None of this has anything to do with what will really happen to anything in the future based on changes in Real World real timing signal inpReal World real timing signal inpreal timing signal inputs.

You know if anything you said was intelligible and you didn't have a «da» in your name (which makes me believe you have dada issues), then you may have a point, but as it stands it's very clear to everyone in the real world that the PlayStation is the dominant brand in video games, like it or not.

Best of all, Dungeons & Dragons Neverwinter is a free - to - play MMORPG which means gamers don't have to pay for anything, however the option is there to purchase in - game items with real - world money.

You don't want to risk going out to forage in the game world, or maybe you did and can't find anything, but you know that there's a pharmacy four miles down the road in the real world.»

«In a way what happened in say the late «80s or beginning of the «90s was that finally the art world's scales fell from their eyes and they realized that, wait a second, all this is real and we don't know anything about it,» says the sculptor John AhearIn a way what happened in say the late «80s or beginning of the «90s was that finally the art world's scales fell from their eyes and they realized that, wait a second, all this is real and we don't know anything about it,» says the sculptor John Ahearin say the late «80s or beginning of the «90s was that finally the art world's scales fell from their eyes and they realized that, wait a second, all this is real and we don't know anything about it,» says the sculptor John Ahearn.

I've always felt there is a much deeper issue to all this, which is that a lot of non-scientists feel that science is something that scientists do in labs wearing lab coats, and doesn't have anything to do with the «real» world.

In this case, I don't think boiling all the alternatives down to a two - by - two grid will yield anything like a useful approximation of the real world.

Now if you were an Astrophysicist that has never really don't anything productive in the real world, you would consider that the top of the atmosphere emissivity of 0.69 and that 5.35 is the correct multiplier for the surface because through your Web Hubble Telescope all you can see is albedo and emissivity which has to equal absorption.

Many answers to that question have been offered, ranging from the extreme difficulty of getting all the governments in the world to agree on anything, to an absence of real technological solutions, to something deep in our human nature that keeps us from acting in the face of seemingly remote threats, to — more recently — the claim that we have blown it anyway and there is no point in even trying to do much more than enjoy the scenery on the way down.

AGWScienceFiction has deliberately excised the real direct heat from the Sun, thermal infrared, so that it can pretend there is such a thing as its claimed «greenhouse gas warming», it uses real world measurements of increases of downwelling longwave infrared but pretends the Sun doesn't have anything to do with this, that it all comes from «greenhouse gases in the atmosphere backradiating / blanketing».

However, SAW doesn't seem to match up to anything in the real world, and the fit to the harmonics seems to be an outcome engineered at least partly by the way the optimisation process was set up.

Surely indeed they could — in some theoretical world — but back in the real world Good Energy and companies like them that sell 100 % tariffs do not reinvest anything at all in new build — check the facts, in nine years or so of existence and promises to the contrary, GE have spent / reinvested nothing at all.

doesn't alter the fact that none of you fixated on radiation in your empty space ideal gas atmosphere without any sound has absolutely anything relevant to say about the energy budget in the real world.

Do they correspond with anything in the real world?

What the hell has hypercomplex numbers to do with anything in the real world.

In the meantime back in the real world Teh Modulz don't agree with each other, and any intellectually honest and remotely objective observer would not be claiming that CAGW True Believers have, to a (wo) man, declared that this state of affairs proves much of anything other than something which is already axiomatic: there really is a great deal more forward - looking uncertainty that rearwarIn the meantime back in the real world Teh Modulz don't agree with each other, and any intellectually honest and remotely objective observer would not be claiming that CAGW True Believers have, to a (wo) man, declared that this state of affairs proves much of anything other than something which is already axiomatic: there really is a great deal more forward - looking uncertainty that rearwarin the real world Teh Modulz don't agree with each other, and any intellectually honest and remotely objective observer would not be claiming that CAGW True Believers have, to a (wo) man, declared that this state of affairs proves much of anything other than something which is already axiomatic: there really is a great deal more forward - looking uncertainty that rearward.

Do you believe in a digital world and models of reality according to academics who have never held real jobs — models that can be constructed to say anything you want them to say?

My own goal is to have readers (and maybe even but not necessarily Graeme) understand the invalidity of his argument asserting that (essentially) one sea level time series observation at one coastal location that (allegedly) doesn't show much change in several decades does not imply that the sea level changes have been the same at all other coastal locations (give or take 100 mm)- which implies that any observed variations exceeding this level in sea level rise at different locations around the world are «not real» and hence sea level rise due to global warming isn't anything to worry about.

At the same time, I really don't have anything really bad to say about the display quality in real - world use.

They give good ratings without even basic technical analysis, just based on few dumb apps which doesn't mean anything in real world usage.

Speaking at the WSJDLive conference in California, Magic Leap CEO and founder Rony Abovitz and Chief Content Officer Rio Caraeff said that Magic Leap turns the real world into a computing platform: «Anything that you can do on your smartphone, on your computer; you'll be able to do on Magic Leap,» Engadget reports Caraeff saying.

The key words here are «ask for»; no one «charges» anyone anything in the real, non-theoretical world, that anyone does not want to pay.