Sentences with phrase «do anything supernatural»

I happen to think that you have to work harder to make a case that Jesus wasn't based on a real life person, but that isn't any endorsement whatsoever of the idea that he was a god, or could do anything supernatural.

Chris Duffett was on a street evangelism team with 12 bored teenagers who mostly didn't believe that God could do anything supernatural — but one got a clear picture of a woman in a red jacket with a fur collar, wearing black boots, and with severe stomach pain.

Not exact matches

All these aspects of changing and socially evolving over time and regretting things and having a troubles heart, all are part of the human experience and have nothing to do with anything supernatural.

I put my confidence in the hard science, and that doesn't point to anything supernatural.

RD: You could say that, it doesn't in any case, nothing about it makes it more probable that there is anything supernatural.

I can prove that anything that has to do with the supernatural is completely fantastic (as in based in fantasy).

I marvel at it, but don't think it has anything to do with god or gods or anything supernatural.

I don't assume automatically that there must be a supernatural explanation for anything, only the things that can't be explained by the laws of physics as we currently understand them.

Of course, as an atheist, I don't think there exists anything supernatural.

I don't fear he'll because I don't believe in it or anything else supernatural.

The supernatural doesn't exist, hence ther is nothing to fear from anything claimed to be «supernatural».

I certainly did not get the idea from those verses of anything like total depravity or that fallen man had to experience any kind of supernatural transformation of the will / heart in order to be able to accept God's convicting / convincing / persuading / call / drawing, instructions, teachings, commands, promises and gifts.

But if God doesn't do anything in the traditional sense of supernatural acts, then what does God do?

I mean, all in all, religion, gods, and supernatural things just don't do anything for me.

Given current lack of evidence for proof of anything supernatural, will there be leniency for those who simply and honestly claim, «I don't know», granted there is a supernatural, and that the Christian God is the true God who did present us with an ultimatum to accept him or not, expecting us to wage the eternal fate of our soul?

Believing that ritualistic superst!tions (praying in a specified manner, washing a certain way, visiting a holy shrine, bowing to an imaginary supernatural being, etc.) will somehow magically convince this super-being to * do * anything is simply not the truth; then going one step further and proclaiming that these beliefs are the * only * way or we will suffer eternal damnation.

So over the course of the next 30 years... my ability to believe in a supernatural narrative or a God who intervenes and does anything died a death of a thousand unanswered prayers».

And I didn't say anything about a supernatural man in the sky.

The second «anything» is not true: Atheists believe in lots of things, they just don't believe in some all - knowing, all - powerful supernatural being that created the universe.

And since they lived in a prescientific age, when anything — naturally caused or otherwise — could happen, they did not hesitate to relate events as having supernatural causes.

Founder of the School of Supernatural Ministry, Kris Vallotton, wrote of the events: «I don't think we have taken more ridicule for anything than [the] gold dust and feathers.

Most atheists are free - thinkers and rationalists, therefore it follows that they do not believe in anything that may be considered or classified as supernatural.

I am not saying that supernatural things don't exist, it is just that they aren't needed to accomplish anything special that aren't done without them.

I am certain that if some supernatural being powerful enough to be called god exists, it sure don't care if you ride, walk, talk, dress, undress, pee, kill, heal or anything else in it's name or for it to notice us.

But you've been around here long enough to realize that I don't believe in anything supernatural, including the myriad visions of an afterlife that man has dreamed up.

There has never been any rational, logical, or scientific proof of any supernatural being that has ever done anything on this planet.

First of all, I'm Christian, obviously, but one day I happened upon a girl who was Wicca and had no idea what she meant when she said that to me after I asked her about her necklace, what does this have to do with anything you ask, well I find magic and the supernatural to be very interesting,...

The Haunting is a superior ghost story that still doesn't overcome the stumbling - block of the whole subgenre: if there's any chance for a rational explanation for weird events, anything non-supernatural is as least as credible as the supernatural conclusions everyone is so fast to embrace.

There isn't anything very «supernatural» about it but more so a select group of people in power think they know better (when they actually don't) and things go wrong... very very wrong.

Winchester makes for a passable supernatural parable about the power of grief and emotional trauma, but fails to do anything interesting with its (somewhat contradictory) commentary on guns and violence.

Winchester doesn't offer anything new, different, or even slightly interesting in its overly familiar story of the supernatural.

Though this isn't the first time that Derrickson has directed a movie about demonic possessions («The Exorcism of Emily Rose»), he doesn't really bring anything new to the table apart from the decision to blend supernatural horror with a police procedural.

If you're after a reasonably mindless supernatural thriller with cheap scares, then The Reaping will suffice, just don't expect anything special.

Mo Hayder's The Devil of Nanking is more about the horrors that people do to one another rather than anything supernatural — but that just makes it all the more terrifying.

The introduction of the supernatural doesn't add anything that you haven't encountered in a hundred other shooters, including more than one prior Wolfenstein game.

Since we know that at least one supernatural event, the big bang, has definitely happened (look around you, see anything, proof), then this does not look like a very good argument.