Sentences with phrase «do as a data scientist»

PH: What findings have been influential for you to dig deeper in what you do as a data scientist?

Not exact matches

Hedge funds, manufacturers and e-commerce companies all use Spire's data, as do nonprofits, Earth scientists and government offices.

Michael Toth, a data scientist at fintech company Orchard, decided to do a sentiment analysis of the letters, comparing the number of negative words such as «loss,» «difficult,» «bad,» and «risk» with the number of positive words, such as «gains,» «top,» «excellent,» and «advantage.»

Banks are doing what they can to keep their research products relevant, such as employing more data scientists to support research from traditional stock analysts.

Cambridge's work for the Cruz campaign ultimately proved uneven, according to campaign officials, who said that while the firm's data scientists were impressive, the psychographic analysis did not bear fruit as hoped.

Dr Chito Medina, MASIPAG partner scientist, said that Health Impact Assessments and Environmental Impact Assessments as required under the JDC should be done by an independent group of experts, and the process can not be confined from the data presented only by the proponents.

As I've said before I don't really approve of folks who expect me to take their perspective, without supporting evidence, I am after all a «data scientist» and I am trained as a scientist, as well as having a decent amount of management experiencAs I've said before I don't really approve of folks who expect me to take their perspective, without supporting evidence, I am after all a «data scientist» and I am trained as a scientist, as well as having a decent amount of management experiencas a scientist, as well as having a decent amount of management experiencas well as having a decent amount of management experiencas having a decent amount of management experience.

However, so far FiveThirtyEight has not done any predictions on the Brexit, so the choice has narrowed down to pure socio - economic models (without taking account of any polling data — so quite different from Silver) such as the one done by the political scientist Matt Qvortrup.

Once this is done, citizen scientists can contribute their observation data, images and video to the organization's database, which is viewed by researchers as well as citizen scientists.

He noted that the equipment to track the seismic signals from calving glaciers is expensive, and it's necessary to have a number of sensors in place — as the Alaska network does — because to pinpoint the location of a calving, glacier scientists have to triangulate data from several sensors.

Bray says the falling cost of genome sequencing, plus portable monitors (such as Fitbit) to track in real time people's behavior and environment, mean that scientists already have the ability to collect the kinds of data they need to do the fundamental research behind precision weight loss.

The data on pollution of the northeast Atlantic, which includes the North Sea and the Irish Sea, do not include fallout into the oceans from air pollution, which some scientists believe may be as great as waterborne pollution.

As researchers strive to unlock the secrets of the brain, they must do more to ensure that the huge amounts of data they generate are not locked up and inaccessible to other scientists who might glean additional insights from the data, speakers said at a 21 March symposium at AAAS.

Oceanographer Vicki Ferrini, who for more than 10 years has managed the Marine Geoscience Data System as a research scientist at the Lamont - Doherty Earth Observatory in Palisades, New York, doesn't see herself as a programmer.

What Devadas and his collaborators — graduate students Ling Ren, Xiangyao Yu and Christopher Fletcher, and research scientist Marten van Dijk — do instead is to arrange memory addresses in a data structure known as a «tree.»

Poring over 12 years of detailed data, atmospheric scientists Joel Thornton at the University of Washington, postdoc Katrina Virts of NASA Marshall Space Flight Center and their colleagues found lightning flashes occur nearly twice as often directly above heavily trafficked shipping lanes as they do elsewhere over the ocean.

Even as European regulators act, however, scientists are divided on whether pollinators are exposed to enough of the pesticides to pose a grave threat to their colonies, in part because of a paucity of data and the challenges of doing rigorous field trials.

Although the robot didn't offer a glimpse of anything living there — it's not equipped with cameras or a sampling arm — it did provide invaluable data for scientists studying the swift - moving Pine Island Glacier ice shelf, which might be thought of as ground zero for the biggest Antarctic mystery of all, in the minds of many scientists: What is happening to the ice?

«We hope that other scientists will use these data to answer questions such as why, unlike humans, some plants do not deteriorate as they age, why some environments are better for agriculture than others, and how fast plant populations will move in response to climate change,» said Yvonne Buckley, professor of Zoology in Trinity College Dublin's School of Natural Sciences.

As experimental facilities generate higher - resolution images at higher speeds, scientists struggle to manage and analyze the resulting data, which is often done painstakingly by hand.

That prompted Dan Willingham, a University of Virginia cognitive scientist, to observe, «Rarely does a policymaker as much as say, «Screw the data, I'm doing what I want.

FICO says that its «data scientists found that alternative data such as property records, telecommunications, and utility information can reliably be used to score 15 million consumers who do not have enough credit data to generate FICO scores.»

Since we have no data from the future, most climate scientists will speak only of what the GCMs say, yet as humans we have learned from the Arctic that melting does not wait on models.

As employees the scientists likely get a small piece of a proprietary data set and do limited work with that.

Honest scientists would thus call for more data collection when faced with a real uncertainty, of course — which McIntyre would never dream of doing, except as a stalling tactic.

As Neil White points out, though, Karl's time might be better spent getting up - to - date on the data that's available rather than pontificating on how scientists should do their job...

People can poke at data for at least two reasons: a) Because they do science, and the idea is to get things as right as possible, and that's good science, and real scientists do it a lot.

Finally, Montford asks the question as to why the scientists and the IPCC promoted the hockey stick at such a high confidence level so prematurely, and why such extraordinary efforts were made to defend it when it arguably isn't a critical piece of the climate puzzle, rather than to learn from outside statisticians and do a credible error analysis on the data and the inferences.

I'm no rocket scientist, but it does raise more questions as to the data intake, whether it's complete or incomplete, and whether its» source is bias or unbias.

It was a good deed to give Dennis Schmitt a forum to respond to Patrick Michaels since Michaels doesn't offer one, we need to see less of the tug of war and more of the real evolving science as scientists strive to fill in gaps in data and missing links in climate models, and to understand feedbacks and the coupled dynamics of land, air and water.

But for journalists and others who are not climate scientists, some narrative would help, as inline text and more clarification as footnotes if needed including, cover for example: — being very clear for a graph what was being forecast (people play silly games with Hansen, confusing which was BAU)-- Perhaps showing original graph first «This is what was predicted...» in [clearly a] sidebar THEN annotated / overlayed graph with «And this is how they did...» sidebar — placing the prediction in context of the evolving data and science (e.g. we'd reached 3xx ppm and trajectory was; or «used improved ocean model»; or whatever)-- perhaps a nod to the successive IPCC reports and links to their narrative, so the historical evolution is clear, and also perhaps, how the confidence level has evolved.

# 57, RE small numbers, I'm no climate scientist, but I do know statisticians have methods, such as Chi - square and log - linear analysis (based on odds ratios), that are quite successful on data sets with small numbers of observations.

as compared to being a real scientist getting a mediocre salary, having to write scientific books your wife wouldn't even read, having to gather data and samples in the too hot, or too cold, field, and doing experiments in a warm, smelly laboratory on unobtanium, where you could accidentally set your tie on fire with a bunsen burner, well, which one would you choose?.

As the Admiral did not acknowledge John Christy when speaking about satellite data, the Admiral was behaving himself as an advocate and not as a scientist; hence, my continued reference to the sailor doing his duty, what he has been told to say, as AdmiraAs the Admiral did not acknowledge John Christy when speaking about satellite data, the Admiral was behaving himself as an advocate and not as a scientist; hence, my continued reference to the sailor doing his duty, what he has been told to say, as Admiraas an advocate and not as a scientist; hence, my continued reference to the sailor doing his duty, what he has been told to say, as Admiraas a scientist; hence, my continued reference to the sailor doing his duty, what he has been told to say, as Admiraas Admiral.

Their tactics and fallacies include ignoring or distorting mainstream scientific results, cherry - picking data and falsely generalizing, bringing up irrelevant red - herring arguments, demanding unachievable «precision» from mainstream science with the motif «if you don't understand this detail you don't understand anything», overemphasizing and mischaracterizing uncertainties in mainstream science, engaging in polemics and prosecutorial - lawyer Swift - Boat - like attacks on science - and lately even scientists, attacking the usual scientific process, misrepresenting legitimate scientific debate as «no consensus», and overemphasizing details of little significance.

I do not care if misguided scientists did not want to release data (it's immaterial now anyway — Best, Giss, etc all show similar figures) Steve: if the situation is as serious as you surmise, then you should blame Jones, CRU and the University of East Anglia for their obstruction of data requests.

If there really are as many data sets available as you are claiming, then some climate scientists should start over and do the whole research project again, this time with full transparency.

That isn't the same thing as saying all climate scientists don't reveal code and data, now is it?

If you are an adherent of sound scientific method, you must NECESSARILY be a skeptic in this as in all other areas of inquiry, and the «climate scientists» complicit in the push for the abrogation of scientific method are by definition NOT «doing science, gathering data, testing,» but rather presenting the seeming of scientific investigation while all the while using that masquerade to advance public policy measures predicated upon malicious nonsense.

perhaps people don't believe in AGW because leading AGW scientists have been caught cooking their data... and then lying about cooking their data... and then taking as gospel data from trade publications but pretending it's from peer - reviewed scientific journals... and then, after having been caught out on it all, pretending that it doesn't matter anyway because it's just true, dammit, and stop questioning it!

A climate scientist can not be judge and jury: the fact that Gleick may have been «defending a cause that he passionately views as righteous» does not make his deceit, lying and data theft a moral action.

Of course they are placing their standards of data manipulation and incompetence on professional scientists because they believe all scientists act unprofessionally as they do.

Do you lawyers sit around and endlessly argue if it is fair to count blacks as only 3/5 of a vote and whether separate but equal facilities are acceptable??? Why do you ask scientists to reargue current sea level rise based on 13 year old datDo you lawyers sit around and endlessly argue if it is fair to count blacks as only 3/5 of a vote and whether separate but equal facilities are acceptable??? Why do you ask scientists to reargue current sea level rise based on 13 year old datdo you ask scientists to reargue current sea level rise based on 13 year old data?

I do remember a guest lead post a while back that strongly insinuated deliberate and deceptive manipulation of data by scientists writing IPCC reports — but that isn't as broad in scope as Andrew's statements in this post.

The biggest reason the public doesn't follow wherever the pro-AGW crowdd leads is because of Climategate, and the emails in which the climate scientists convict themselves of unscientific behavior and collusion and conspiracy, as well as cherry - picking and deceptive fudging of the data, as in «hide the decline.»

Though there is nothing wrong with scientists being political as everyone has an opinion on political issues, the line is crossed when that political idology dictates what the scientist does in their research when it biases their data and conclutions.

I don't know, I'm not part of that conspiracy, and I see a lot of assertions on here and elsewhere by people who imply they are smart, or at least smart enough to know more on this issue than the climate scientists who actually professionally study it, who throw around large highfalutin science terms, but that repeatedly misconstrue the basic climate change issue itself, conflate the process of science with Climate Change refutation, seem to have an extensively poor understanding of the issue, and take small select bits of data as part of the ongoing total picture of increasing overall corroboration, to falsely equate that with a flaw in Climate Change theory itself, or as a referendum on it.

I note Gavin refers to non-climate scientists who challenge the AGW alarmists as «citizen scientists» perhaps he should consider the climate scientist who are doing data analysis as «citizen data analysts» because frankly from what I've read on these pages they seem to be a pretty amateurist bunch.

I lived in the government trenches for decades and executed the laws and used the budget provided as best can be done to provide data to scientists worldwide.

«But when it's done in an organized fashion as part of a political agenda — when you ask for all the data that a scientist has ever produced — that's just nuisance tactics.»