If books costs $ 10,000 each, everyone understands that you would actually earn * less * than
you do at the current price - range.
Not exact matches
However, they
do not sell as they are marginally better than the
current technology
at a much higher
price.
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future
pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase
price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or
at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of
doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign
current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
«It's likely that a deal (with Gannett) will get
done in the end and probably
at a little higher premium» than the
current offer
price, he said.
I looked
at getting into Bitcoin back when it was 2300 a coin, now don't want to pay the
current price compared what I could have paid..
The reality is that one doesn't need interest rates reasonably estimate 10 - year prospective market returns, just as one doesn't need interest rates to calculate that a $ 100 expected payment in 10 years,
at a
current price of $ 65, will result in an expected total return of 4.4 % over the coming decade.
In 2002, Bezos
did give his shares worth $ 500 million
at current prices for charitable missions.
We don't expect the coin to re-test its lows, as several strong support levels are below the
current price level,
at $ 51, $ 44, and $ 38.
(i) by causing Retrophin to commence a litigation against
Doe in order to coerce
Doe into giving Shkreli
Doe's Fearnow Shares, and by causing Retrophin to enter into a settlement with
Doe whereby Retrophin paid $ 100,000 and
Doe delivered 50,000 shares to Shkreli, resulting in a benefit to Shkreli of more than $ 1.4 million (
at current market
prices).
How long
do you think the stock
price would stay
at its
current level?»
The SEC has cautioned investors that «some bidders make mini-tender offers
at below - market
prices, hoping that they will catch investors off guard if the investors
do not compare the offer
price to the
current market
price.»
Even if you have private information that I don't have, it's impossible to use it to make a profit because as soon as you try to buy, I infer that you must have information that the security is desirable
at the
current price.
Current market
pricing suggests that an interest rate increase
at the March 14 - 15 policy meeting is all but a
done deal, a move that would bring the Fed's benchmark interest rate target range to 1.5 % -1.75 %.
As usual, I don't place too much emphasis on this sort of forecast, but to the extent that I make any comments
at all about the outlook for 2006, the bottom line is this: 1) we can't rule out modest potential for stock appreciation, which would require the maintenance or expansion of already high
price / peak earnings multiples; 2) we also should recognize an uncomfortably large potential for market losses, particularly given that the
current bull market has now outlived the median and average bull, yet
at higher valuations than most bulls have achieved, a flat yield curve with rising interest rate pressures, an extended period of internal divergence as measured by breadth and other market action, and complacency
at best and excessive bullishness
at worst, as measured by various sentiment indicators; 3) there is a moderate but still not compelling risk of an oncoming recession, which would become more of a factor if we observe a substantial widening of credit spreads and weakness in the ISM Purchasing Managers Index in the months ahead, and; 4) there remains substantial potential for U.S. dollar weakness coupled with «unexpectedly» persistent inflation pressures, particularly if we
do observe economic weakness.
Sorry, bland humour aside, news of the hard fork really
does seem to be pushing up the
price of Bitcoin Cash, just since the 18th of April we have seen Bitcoin Cash move from $ 755.00 up to $ 995.00, with the
current value of Bitcoin Cash sitting
at $ 980.18, up 10.44 %
at the time of writing.
Hard rock deposits by and large are not economic
at current spot (or term) uranium
prices, so if you see uranium
at $ 75 or $ 80 per pound in the coming years (I don't), purchasing shares in hard rock uranium development companies could lead to gains.
So that's a question that I don't think we know the answer to, but if millennials can't buy the boomers house
at the
current value than basic supply and demand economics suggests that
prices will have to fall to the point
at which they're affordable to millennials.
-- the
current price at 12,35 EUR is ~ 1/3 lower than the expired take - over offer from Deutsche Annington 6 weeks ago — although the share will be delisted by the end of the year, I
do believe that a squeeze - out under Luxembourg law is very likely within the next 12 - 18 months close to the initial offer
price (~ 50 % upside from
current price)-- the downside is that following November, the stock will be unlisted and hard to sell and that for some reason the Acquirer Deutsche Annington will not squeeze out the remaining minorities
If they
do so, they will have
prices held
at the
current level of 22.72 ppl until May 31.
Have said it a couple of times now that we don't need carvalho... The epl is way tougher dan d under 21 cup... so he is still a risk
at his
current price... 37million is just too much for a raw talent!
One of the most foolish post @ Big gun...... a winner is a winner and a looser is a looser... who have asked Old wenger to spend over the odds to buy players... his sick and have problems...... with the
current squad he can
do better... simple 1) Buy needed player
at the right
price to cover needed position..
Loan moves are always good as long as they play regularly and impress their
current managers.Even if they
do nt come back
at least we get a good
price for them!
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look
at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the
current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our
current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then
do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we
did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I
do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality
at the striker position falls once again squarely
at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket
prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club...
does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the
price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their
current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has
done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame
at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
The analogy with the ruling elite is a good one (but I don't accept this elite is solely made up of bankers, lol), and I think it points to the worst aspect of the
current regime
at Arsenal, that they are able to pay themselves world - class salaries whilst serving up a substandard product
at world - leading
prices.
Well the sale of Gonzalo Higuain has
done a lot to inflate the
prices of players in European football and if Belotti continues his
current form I'm sure Torino would have no trouble in finding potential suitors
at that
price.
«Since Nana Addo took office, he has
done well, but the
current increment in fuel
prices is not helpful
at all.
«
At the
current world market
prices and
current level of production, we are getting about GH cents 1 billion annually, which will be enough to cover the Free SHS, but that will lead you no opportunity to
do anything else; but funding Free SHS.
Although $ 2.20 per gallon
does not represent a large savings over the
current price of gasoline in the United States, Long cautions consumers and politicians to look
at the bigger picture.
But it is worth remembering that even
at current prices, we don't buy all the efficiency in use of natural resources that is less expensive than those natural resources.
Whether you are heading to a family gathering or simply
doing Sunday brunch (most likely what I will be
doing:p) dress season is here, so I found some of my
current favorites
at all
price ranges that are perfect for any spring fling ♥
This set
does more far more right than wrong and
current fans of the series have no reason not to pick it up, especially
at the reasonable retail
price.
Pricing for the 2018 model has yet to be announced, but we don't expect it to be much more expensive than the
current Fit, which starts
at $ 16,965.
Since I'm a bit of a Honda person, having owned many good ones, I
do find this NSX entertaining but not
at current prices.
Don't expect
pricing for the 2017 Mercedes - Benz SL to change too much; the
current base SL400 starts
at $ 84,925.
Does such a proposal soak people who struggle to pay for gas even
at its relatively low
current prices?
Bentley didn't reveal
pricing yet, but the
current model starts
at about $ 178,000; the GT Speed comes in
at $ 217,000.
Since 2008
doing approx 1000 miles per year, I put it through an mot on the 10th January, it passed without advisories;; The underneath is very solid indeed and doesn't need any work, the
current paint was
done approx 7 years ago to a good standard but is not perfect, when it had a change from Albert Blue (traces of it around the battery boxes) to the
current black;; It still has the US import sticker on the left side door post, the original chassis plate and the chassis stamp on the bulkhead are all there;; It drives very well, I've driven it for circa 40 miles with no problems;; It has 15» Fuchs alloys and the spare is a chrome steel wheel;; The rear end has been «modernised»
at some point, I personally would remove the rear Porsche reflector and fit an original panel and bumper stops to get it back to the original pre impact bumper look, I could
do this for you if required, cost circa GBP 800;; The seats have been changed to 80's leather recaros and the door cards to a later style, again I'd put some period seats in and back date the door cards if required
at cost
price;; The 80's recaros are worth good money so shouldn't be too much further expense if they were sold separately;; Further information to come but please contact me if you have any queries;; In summary, a really good looking classic 911Targa, that is great value and can be enjoyed as is, or improved for not a lot of money;;
We don't have a base
price yet, but for reference the
current CLS starts
at about $ 75,000 and goes up to $ 109K or so.
It doesn't just stop
at mpgs; the Prius can be configured to show historical fuel efficiency for the past few mile or the past few weeks or, if you input a reference fuel economy and the
current fuel
prices, to calculate how much fuel and money the Prius is saving you in real time.
So you've missed out on the three Lamborghini Veneno LP750 - 4 that were unveiled in Geneva back in 2013 and you're not a Roadster fan either, so the still available Veneno LP750 - 4 Roadster just isn't the car for you even if the $ 3,300,000 (about USD 4,500,000)
price tag doesn't scare you away... you're stuck with only two options... try to convince one of the
current Veneno owners to sell you their car
at a substantial premium (the Veneno LP750 - 4 Bianco changed hands for an undisclosed amount of money)... or get the next best thing: an Aventador with a body kit.
We're expecting the new Astra to go on sale shortly after its debut
at the Frankfurt Motor Show in September,
at prices we don't really expect to start
at much more than the
current Astra's # 15,445.
Don't be surprised if a vehicle you are looking
at changes in
price based on
current market conditions!
This really is a very high specification car which seems to have every extra available
at the time - long MOT till 04/11/2018, with NO advisories & the only problem i have with the car is that i
do think the 51 reg makes it look too old as with such low mileage it looks a much newer car so as part of the deal i could include my reg A9 MMW which has been valued up to # 1000 which is on a retention certificate so it could easily be put on the car just as soon as the v5 is in the new owners name but it would look a much newer car with a private reg PLEASE NOTE the current reg is the 51 reg shown in 1 photo i have put my private reg A9 MMW on the car for the new photos to show how much better it makes the car look but that can be negotiated as part of any deal PLEASE NO OFFERS UNDER # 8000 AS YOU WILL JUST BE WASTING BOTH YOUR TIME & MINE THIS STUNNING LOW MILEAGE CAR COST AROUND # 100000 NEW SO IT IS SUPERB VALUE PLEASE NOTE THE PRICE IS # 9999 ONO WITH THE PRIVATE REG A9MMW VALUED AROUND # 1000 OR # 8999 OVNO WITH THE 51 REG BUT DO THINK IT LOOKS SO MUCH BETTER WITH THE PRIVATE REG THIS IS A LOVELY EXAMPLE OF THE FLAGSHIP MERCEDES S CLASS S600 & VERY RARE AS IT HAS SUCH LOW MILEAGE ONLY 34000 MILES & WHEN YOU THINK THIS CAR WITH SUCH A HIGH SPEC ORIGINALLY COST # 100000 NEW IT IS SUPERB VALUE FOR MONEY REASONABLE OFFERS INVITED BUT ONLY OVER (NOT UNDER) # 8000 AS HAVE ALREADY OFFERED # 8200 WITH THE 51 REG & # 9000 WITH THE PRIVATE REG FINALLY THESE CARS ARE APPRECIATING IN VALUE IF THEY ARE LIKE THIS CAR IN VERY GOOD CONDITION WITH LOW MILEAGE SO THIS CAR WOULD BE A VERY GOOD LONG TERM FINANCIAL INVESTMENT & ANY SERIOUS BUYER WILL KNOW THAT A MERCEDES S600 THAT ORIGINALLY COST AROUND # 100000 NEW WITH ONLY 34000 MILES IS A GENUINE BARGAIN» ANY QUERIES EMAIL OR CALL ME ON 07757 359570 THANKY
do think the 51 reg makes it look too old as with such low mileage it looks a much newer car so as part of the deal i could include my reg A9 MMW which has been valued up to # 1000 which is on a retention certificate so it could easily be put on the car just as soon as the v5 is in the new owners name but it would look a much newer car with a private reg PLEASE NOTE the
current reg is the 51 reg shown in 1 photo i have put my private reg A9 MMW on the car for the new photos to show how much better it makes the car look but that can be negotiated as part of any deal PLEASE NO OFFERS UNDER # 8000 AS YOU WILL JUST BE WASTING BOTH YOUR TIME & MINE THIS STUNNING LOW MILEAGE CAR COST AROUND # 100000 NEW SO IT IS SUPERB VALUE PLEASE NOTE THE
PRICE IS # 9999 ONO WITH THE PRIVATE REG A9MMW VALUED AROUND # 1000 OR # 8999 OVNO WITH THE 51 REG BUT
DO THINK IT LOOKS SO MUCH BETTER WITH THE PRIVATE REG THIS IS A LOVELY EXAMPLE OF THE FLAGSHIP MERCEDES S CLASS S600 & VERY RARE AS IT HAS SUCH LOW MILEAGE ONLY 34000 MILES & WHEN YOU THINK THIS CAR WITH SUCH A HIGH SPEC ORIGINALLY COST # 100000 NEW IT IS SUPERB VALUE FOR MONEY REASONABLE OFFERS INVITED BUT ONLY OVER (NOT UNDER) # 8000 AS HAVE ALREADY OFFERED # 8200 WITH THE 51 REG & # 9000 WITH THE PRIVATE REG FINALLY THESE CARS ARE APPRECIATING IN VALUE IF THEY ARE LIKE THIS CAR IN VERY GOOD CONDITION WITH LOW MILEAGE SO THIS CAR WOULD BE A VERY GOOD LONG TERM FINANCIAL INVESTMENT & ANY SERIOUS BUYER WILL KNOW THAT A MERCEDES S600 THAT ORIGINALLY COST AROUND # 100000 NEW WITH ONLY 34000 MILES IS A GENUINE BARGAIN» ANY QUERIES EMAIL OR CALL ME ON 07757 359570 THANKY
DO THINK IT LOOKS SO MUCH BETTER WITH THE PRIVATE REG THIS IS A LOVELY EXAMPLE OF THE FLAGSHIP MERCEDES S CLASS S600 & VERY RARE AS IT HAS SUCH LOW MILEAGE ONLY 34000 MILES & WHEN YOU THINK THIS CAR WITH SUCH A HIGH SPEC ORIGINALLY COST # 100000 NEW IT IS SUPERB VALUE FOR MONEY REASONABLE OFFERS INVITED BUT ONLY OVER (NOT UNDER) # 8000 AS HAVE ALREADY OFFERED # 8200 WITH THE 51 REG & # 9000 WITH THE PRIVATE REG FINALLY THESE CARS ARE APPRECIATING IN VALUE IF THEY ARE LIKE THIS CAR IN VERY GOOD CONDITION WITH LOW MILEAGE SO THIS CAR WOULD BE A VERY GOOD LONG TERM FINANCIAL INVESTMENT & ANY SERIOUS BUYER WILL KNOW THAT A MERCEDES S600 THAT ORIGINALLY COST AROUND # 100000 NEW WITH ONLY 34000 MILES IS A GENUINE BARGAIN» ANY QUERIES EMAIL OR CALL ME ON 07757 359570 THANKYOU
Do not expect a deal like this to last long; hurry in for a test drive today!Audi of Nashville Market
Price Guarantee — Our commitment to you is the price you see here is guaranteed to be at or below the current market value for this vehicle based on year, miles, equipment and availabi
Price Guarantee — Our commitment to you is the
price you see here is guaranteed to be at or below the current market value for this vehicle based on year, miles, equipment and availabi
price you see here is guaranteed to be
at or below the
current market value for this vehicle based on year, miles, equipment and availability.
«In the
current market environment we don't see the need for hybrid models either as our petrol and diesel models already offer excellent efficiency
at an affordable
price,» McGuiness said.
A used original Sony Reader Touch (PRS - 600) can also be picked up
at a significant discount ($ 118 compared to the $ 229.99 retail
price of the
current version) if you don't mind a previous generation e-reader that had some screen glare issues.
I don't know
current details, but ran across some video catalogs in the early»90s that showed new title
pricing for video stores
at 3 to 4 times the MSRP.
This cut
does not affect the Verizon branded XOOM 3G version, which will remain
at its
current $ 799.99 retail
price point (sans contract).
For my usage it is perfect, and
at the
current price I don't think their is a better 8 inch Tablet for sale.
While I don't recommend a Xoom
at it's
current price, I found I enjoy mine for web browsing, reading (e.g., pdfs), watching Amazon instant videos, and listening to audio.