Sentences with phrase «do attribution»

Trenberth spews: «So why does the science community continue to do attribution studies and assume that humans have no influence as a null hypothesis?»

The claim by advocates seems to be that the only way to do an attribution study is with a climate model, which, as Judith notes, is a circular argument.

and one would simply NOT do the attribution experiment.

And what tiny fraction were sitting around the table when it was decided exactly how to do the attribution exercise — attributing as much as possible of the recorded trend to external forcings, and downplaying the importance of the error model?

It does appear to be the first paper to do this attribution using a full GCM.

How do Levitus et al. do the attribution part of their study, when they claim that the warming can only be explained by the increase in atmospheric GHGs?

It does not do the attribution - bit and does not say why data would by non-iid.

Given that we know there are multiple drivers of climate operating (the sun for sure, but also volcanoes, aerosols, greenhouse gas changes, land use change, etc.) the only way to do attribution properly is calculate the physical fingerprints of each of these drivers across multiple variables and see which combinations provide the best fits.

Therefore there is more flexibility in the exact proportions when you do the attribution with OA and GHG independently as when you lump them together in contrast to NAT factors.

Normally, with a single event there isn't enough information to do any attribution, but Pall et al set up a very large ensemble of runs starting from roughly the same initial conditions to see how often the flooding event occurred.

Mike: I don't have to do any attribution.

The challenge lies in the fact that natural variability is always a part of any extreme weather event, so when scientists do attribution exercises, they are trying to discern the human signal out of the noise.

Using a 3D model to tease out the underlying trend is a «much more sophisticated way to do the attribution,» says Ross Salawitch, an atmospheric scientist at the University of Maryland, College Park.

If I were to do an attribution analysis of the sales process, I'd quickly learn that 98 % + of customers bought after being asked to buy.

Who painted that Madonna, and why does an attribution turn on everything from botany to religious beliefs in Europe and the conquest of Mexico?

I'm not a close follower of the literature in this area, but has someone done an attribution study showing that the 97 - 98 event — or general ENSO variation in the past 30 years — would be unchanged in the absence of increasing anthropogenic GHG forcing?

How one does attribution is indeed an issue.

The IPCC have usually done the attribution for the whole period since 1950.

We are doing attribution but far outside the narrow walls of failure analysis.

What is the fundamental attribution error, and how do your attributions impact your marriage?

Not exact matches

And most don't require any attribution at all.

The space is new and is not technically called offline to offline, but the attribution model effectively does just that.

Carson didn't plagiarize in anything directly related to his campaign, but it was discovered last year that portions of his book America the Beautiful — which was published in 2012 and clearly designed as part of the retired neurosurgeon's entry into politics — were taken directly from other sources, including a website called SocialismSucks.net, without consistent attribution.

And in February 2016, it created Attribution, which helps advertisers answer their most pressing question: After someone sees a digital message, do they take action in the real world?

If you want to learn more about how multi-touch attribution can work, check out this customer cast study we did with Nimble Storage!

Does investing «leader» overconfidence (self - attribution bias) transfer bad trading practices to other non-professional investors who participate in a social trading platform?

I don't have a great process for figuring out an approximate attribution for all converting keywords, as you put it — it's going to be incredibly difficult to attribute conversion to «net set» or «not provided» queries.

Although the proper attribution of necessary existence to God does not show that God exists (unless we are prepared to allow that reality must have some significant correspondence to what is presupposed in our attempt to find ultimate meaning in reality — an assumption which, as I have suggested, may not be easy to justify but is probably impossible to avoid in such metaphysical thought), it does show that God is either the ground of and compatible with all that is and all that is actually possible or is totally alien to all reality.

Not only does Bernheim plagiarize Verlinde, he also gets rid of the attributions, transforming the quotations into his own voice.

I do require that if you use a recipe of mine in any way that you use the common practice of Recipe Attribution and give me credit for the recipe.

Your use of the Site does not entitle you to make any unauthorized use of any protected content, and in particular you will not delete or alter any proprietary rights or attribution notices in any content.

Did someone else already tweet the same basic thing you'd planned to share, except without attribution, context, or expressed in unclear language?

Moreover, the motion states that while the Copyright Act gives owners some rights, including reproducing and distributing a piece of work or preparing derivative works, «with the exception of visual arts, the right of attribution simply doesn't exist under U.S. copyright.»

Other guidelines include making sure that graduate students receive proper professional attribution for their work and that faculty members support graduate students» «extra-academic activities,» such as getting training for job interviews, seeking information on career options within academia and beyond, or doing an internship.

Trenberth says, and some scientists agree, that attribution studies that use climate models do not work well for weather events that are local and dynamic — a flash in the pan.

The general public probably does not understand the nuance, acknowledged Stephanie Herring, an attribution scientist at NOAA's National Centers for Environmental Information.

One challenge with storms in Germany is that climate models have trouble accurately depicting such small - scale features, but a new generation of models that should come into wider use within the next year or two do a much better job, meaning that attribution analyses on such events should become more feasible, van Oldenborgh said.

A new report released Friday by the National Academy of Sciences has found that such extreme event attribution studies can be done reliably for certain types of weather extremes, including heavy precipitation.

But does the specific percentage attribution really imply much for the future?

The complexity of the new study «had a big impact on how certain we were» that «we would be able to do a sensible analysis,» said Geert Jan van Oldenborgh, a Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute climate scientist who was involved with this and prior rapid attribution studies.

This was an improvement on the other source - attribution methods that either don't completely isolate contributions from particular sources or they require running the model many times in order to turn the sources off and on one at a time.

Investigating the cause of 20th Century warming is properly done in detection and attribution studies, which analyze the various forcings (e.g., solar variations, greenhouse gases or volcanic activity) and the observed time and space patterns of climate change in detail.

The first study tying a weather event to climate change didn't come out until 2004, making the field of weather event attribution less than 15 years old.

This is possible and the emerging science of extreme event attribution is doing exactly that.

EUCLEIA, a european project that ended this year, did not only explore many of the challenges and limitations of extreme event attribution but in particular fostered and strengthened a scientific community that will live on in other projects for the coming years.

The team did not only look at specific events however but also published a number of conceptual papers on attribution as a science, CPDN as a unique capability and climate modelling in general (10 - 15).

As stated, the attribution of the species rudolfensis to any specimen is somewheat controversial, since many paleoanthropologists do not see rudolfensis as a valid species.

For example, I am patiently waiting for someone at the Guardian to address the serious misrepresentations of Oxburgh and Muir Russell made by Steve McIntyre at last week's panel discussions in the U.K. (Not to mention McIntyre's characterization of paleoclimatology as little more than «phrenology» or his inability to answer a simple question about attribution of current warming — and don't get me started on Fred Pearce).

The method had advantages over other source - attribution methods, which either don't completely isolate contributions from particular sources or require running the model many times to turn the sources off and on one at a time.

«This is something we've always wanted to do with an attribution study,» said study co-author Neil Massey, a researcher with Oxford University's Environmental Change Institute.