Sentences with phrase «do average sea surface temperatures»

As global temperatures rise, so too do average sea surface temperatures.

Not exact matches

Since 1850, CO2 levels rose, as did the «globally and annually averaged land and sea surface temperature anomaly» (for what it's worth), but nobody knows whether or not the increase in CO2 had anything whatsoever to do with the warming.

Did we have a better «globally and annually averaged land and sea surface temperature anomaly» in 1900 -LRB--0.142 C) than today (+0.339 C in 2011)?

We (that includes you and me plus Hansen, Trenberth, Jones and the IPCC) don't have an earthly notion what is going to happen to our «globally and annually averaged land and sea surface temperature anomaly» over the next two years, let alone the next few hundred years.

On the previous sea surface temperature thread, I stated «Do you for one minute believe that the uncertainty in global average sea surface temperature in the 19th century is 0.3 C?

I found that when LOD data is added to integrated sunspot numbers departing from the long term average, a curve can be produced which matches the sea surface temperature record from 1850 significantly better than the co2 curve does.

I would rate «Average Earth Land - Sea Surface Temperature» (even on any given day, no less a century long time series) a serious «We don't know to any degree of usable accuracy.»

Doing this on a year - to - year basis shows NO apparent correlation with the absolute «globally and annually averaged land and sea surface temperature anomaly» (i.e. HadCRUT3), but does show a weak correlation with the CHANGE in temperature from the previous year, for example:

Since annual land surface temperatures are on average less than sea surface temperatures, the temperature difference between land and ocean is decreasing, not increasing, but don't let the facts get in the way of your evaluation.