Sentences with phrase «do business with anyone»

However, he's quick to point out that he'll do business with anyone.
Your end game should be a relationship with your Top 50 clients who wouldn't do business with anyone but you.
These are the same folks who wouldn't let anyone they care about do business with anyone but you.
This is the first and last time we do business with anyone or business who uses Alliance.
I do almost all my shopping online these days, and I almost won't do business with anyone who does not offer PayPal.
Don't do business with anyone who offers an «easy out» of foreclosure.
I would do business with anyone, so long as they offered value.
Finally, do not do business with anyone who encourages you to lie on a mortgage application.
Treat writers and readers as well as possible, and refuse to do business with anyone who tries to squeeze you for making that decision.
Do business with anyone but him.
«It's an investment we make to stay on top of all the certifications we need to do business with anyone in every quarter of the world.»
No one on the West Coast has a shorter memory or less reluctance than entrepreneurs to do business with anyone with funds (a good entrepreneur would borrow cash from his grandmother) except maybe Hollywood producers who'd work with the devil if he had a hot concept.
Vet them out, inside and out, before doing business with anyone.
US persons and corporations are forbidden from doing business with anyone designated by the sanctions, cutting targets off from much of the world's financial infrastructure.
The next time you are interested in doing business with anyone, Google the name prior to making a commitment.

Not exact matches

Invite your suppliers, accountant, lawyer, investors and anyone else you do business with.
Anyone who has had anything to do with a business, especially investors, will be very skeptical when all they hear is «the good.»
We were fortunate and privileged to fund it by ourselves, so we took the decision from the beginning to control everything - the fate of the business, how we hire, how we fire, and so on, and we didn't want anyone interfering with that.
Or, the group focuses on doing deep dives into each other's businesses similar to the case study approach anyone who attended business school would be familiar with.
If you're a first - time entrepreneur with a business idea, you probably need to do a lot of research and planning before you're able to persuade anyone — banks, angels, friends or family members — to give you funding.
As the network seems poised for change — recently, LinkedIn announced that it will soon allow anyone to publish content on its platform (much as LinkedIn Influencers do now)-- I talked with David Gowel, CEO at RockTech, and author of The Power in a Link: Open Doors, Close Deals, and Change the Way You Do Business Using LinkedIdo now)-- I talked with David Gowel, CEO at RockTech, and author of The Power in a Link: Open Doors, Close Deals, and Change the Way You Do Business Using LinkedIDo Business Using LinkedIn.
It is, for example, completely inappropriate to send anyone but the CEO to an interview meant to inspire other entrepreneurs on creating a multi-million-dollar business with stories of how you did it.
A settlement means that we're going to not chance it to the jury to make a decision, we agree to disagree on whether anyone did anything wrong but we're making a practical business decision, we're going to pay this much to be done with this case and not test the waters.
Don't agree to partner with anyone, or take on a partner, until you are clear in your own mind and on paper about how you would choose to end your business.
Instead this was a smiling, affable Harper, equal parts sharp and confident — the kind of guy anyone should want to do business with.
Showcasing dozens of practical examples of successful companies doing well by doing good ranging from solo entrepreneurs to Fortune 100 global corporations) anyone with the responsibility for any manner of commerce can learn how to heal the world while gaining the practical marketing savvy to turn ethical and moral values into business success.
Also, anyone doing business with the newly elected legislative superbody will also be subject to US sanctions.
What makes my strategy successful is my philosophy that you don't have to morph into an alpha - male to get great press - by practicing effective principles that combine business smarts with honesty, anyone can gracefully glide to the top.
And, from a practical viewpoint, with the economy in the tank, unemployment out of limits, and us fighting a war that never had a possible solution, anything a couple of people can do to make themselves happy is none of anyone's business and, as far as I am concerned, OK.
The right - wing zealots do it all the time... that's one of your major tools is to boycott anyone / business that is not in line with the Bible and God's word, yes...?
I know implicitly that the Jewish people do not wish the same upon anyone else, they just want to be left alone to get on with their lives and do business.
But it is completely wrong that anyone (or business) should be exempt from following the same rules as the rest simply because the rules don't jibe with their religious views.
The fact that some of the leadership and founders of these companies are Christian should not turn anyone off or make them vow to never do business with them.
So... I would say to anyone with a new business that although delegation and letting others do tasks for you is one of the hardest parts of starting a business, there will inevitably come a time where it is essential and the better you are at it, the more likely you are to succeed.
That is assuming anyone wants to do business with Dallas (recall 2016 and our inability to deal done for Paxton Lynch).
If you're willing to degrade yourself for useless fans that's your business but it doesn't take a genius to see why anyone with any self - worth would not.
There are many other examples of the clubs lack of ambition and ineptitude over the last ten years and I don't have either the patience or the time to go through the whole catalogue, its clear to anyone who is clear headed and able to for a reasonably intelligent opinion that our beloved club is being run by a bunch of silver spooned business men who car nothing for the clubs status within the areana that it operates only for the share prices and profit and loss margins and they are aided by a stubborn and deluded manager who has failed to deliver the EPL to his clubs fans for over ten years and who has failed to move with the times simply because he can retain his role in the club and deliver the minimum of results but maximum profit to the shareholders and board.
Better at attacking than Gibbs and as good as Monreal tracking back... should be a no brainer... Gibbs sold ageing Monreal a good back up and can ease this guy in to EPL... Net cost maybe 10m... but as far as I can tell wenger believes most of his business is done with Shaka jap as holding option for welbecks return wilshere and santi back and «revitalized» giroud and Ramsey like new signings... But anyone basing next years EPL on this euros is beyond football redemption... All the poor performers last year have upped their management and squads... So far the only non mover..
The bottom line is, the board and anyone with any real business sense will know what Wenger has done for this club during his tenure has been nothing short of a miracle.
Ensuring that tens of thousands of WrestleMania attendees stick around for Raw and the post-Mania SmackDown show doesn't hurt anyone's financial bottom line, making it easier for WWE's corporate execs to do business with interested municipalities vying to host these annual events.
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
However, they will not consider doing business with Fulham or anyone else until they have a replacement lined up amid speculation that they have an interest in Liverpool's Divock Origi.
we should never do business with Warnock, or anyone else concerned with Sheff utd past or present.I am not bitter over their Capitl One thimble win i, just remember a lot of smug faces around that time, do us a favour mo do nt go!
it is none of anyone's business what you do with your baby, so long as you are both happy.
And refusing campaign contributions from anyone doing business with the State pension fund.»
«Anyone who opposes this measure and truly believes we should go back to the old way of doing business is out of touch with reality and the struggles of working and middle class suburban families.»
The governor has previously rejected the notion that his book deal had anything to do with state business, saying book income is «an exception» because «I'm not allowed to represent anyone or any business matter.»
«The Bank of Ghana wishes to inform the general public that MMM Ghana is NOT LICENSED by the Bank of Ghana to engage in any form of deposit - taking activity, hence anyone who does business with MMM Ghana does so at his or her own risk,» BoG warned further.
«Accordingly, the general public is cautioned that anyone who transacts any of the above mentioned business with Menzgold Ghana Company Limited, does so at his / her own risk and Bank of Ghana will not be liable to such clients and depositors in the event of loss, the BoG said in a statement.
He said anyone who did business with Menzgold was taking a personal risk even though the Minerals Commission had given Menzgold a licence to purchase gold.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z