Sentences with phrase «do certain things because»

How to Stop Annoying Dog Behaviors Dogs do certain things because they're fun!

I couldn't do certain things because either my body wasn't «ready» or I was afraid I'd gain an OUNCE back.

There are times when I feel like I have an obligation not to do certain things because I'm preparing myself to pitch.

«Keep the plan simple and clear, and be willing to say, «We are not going to do certain things because we just don't have the time and the bandwidth.»»

«There's a lot of clutch situations, where you don't want to do a certain thing because you don't know if you can react to it or not.

Not exact matches

Just because things have «always» been done a certain way, does not mean they should continue to be done that way.

EASTWOOD: Well I think yeah, sometimes you can have overly dramatic music and I started writing music basically because I saw a lot of... I had a lot of composers come in and work for me and they always wanted to dramatize certain things and take it over the top sometimes and I didn't want it over the top.

My folks would probably never order certain things online, partly because they can't see and feel the end product, but also because they would be afraid they would do something wrong that affected the result.

You have to postpone buying a house, you can't afford certain vacations, and you can't do all the fun things you want to do because you have a proverbial ball and chain with student loans.

Because let's be honest, there isn't really a problem with the blockchain knowing you bought some groceries but certain things you just don't want to broadcast to the world.

Atheists: I know many there are many people that practice religion just by fanaticism, I've seen many people in my opinion stupid (excuse the word) praying to saints hopping to solve their problems by repeating pre-made sentences over and over, but there are others different, I don't think Religion and Science need to be opposites, I believe in God, I'm Catholic and I have many reasons to believe in him, I don't think however that we should pray instead of looking for the cause and applying a solution, Atheists think they are smart because they focus on Science and technology instead of putting their faith in a God, I don't think God will solve our problems, i think he gave us the means to solve them by ourselves that's were God is, also I think that God created everything but not as a Magical thing but stablishing certain rules like Physics and Quimics etc. he's not an idiot and he knew how to make it so everything was on balance, he's the Scientist of Scientist the Mathematic of Mathematics, the Physician of Physicians, from the tiny little fact that a mosquito, an insect species needs to feed from blood from a completely different species, who created the mosquitos that way?

So how do you go from that reasoning to «Since it wasn't accidental then it must have been this ancient male diety named (fill in blank depending on religion) who loves me and knows me and cares for me and wants me to perform rituals that have nothing to do with morality like prayer, not eating certain things, sabaath and many more just because he said so, even though we have no record of him saying anything, just records of humans who wrote things down that they claim he said, but I want to believe it all so badly I will base my beliefs on no other evidence than «it just can't be accident».

As long as they are viable for some purposes, things don't die out just because other things evolved «past» them in certain ways.

Just because Christ is shown doing or being certain things for the church in the Ephesians 5:21 - 33 text, does not mean that husbands are to do or be each of those same things for their wives.

When I am forced to ignore my conscience because tradition dictates things be done a certain way, I feel like a fraud.

Though I do think that many alcoholics don't have direct control over their situation because of a chemical dependancy that is produced due to an individuals genetics, personality, and levels of dependency (which is not a negative thing per say, it's just that certain people do have genetic predispositions to addiction).

It might be a pretty thing (but, again, I'm not absolutely certain) if a boy never asked for cake because he was so high - minded and spiritual that he didn't want any cake.

But I don't think that we should celebrate the death of a certain someone because I believe that death is a sensitive issue, and if we are celebrating death, then we are doing the same thing Osama was doing to begin with.

But, in modern political conversation, when a Christian articulates that people ask, «Does that mean you won't care about certain things because Jesus is coming back soon?

Likewise, when he instructed people to behave in certain ways, he did not say that you should do this because it's the right thing to do.

The reason God says some strong things about certain sins in the Bible is because these sins hurt us, and He loves us, and doesn't want to see us hurt by sin.

The overall evidence weighs heavy towards doing the right thing in a land of brutal oppression of certain people because the Hebrew were holly, set apart for God and redeemed from the bondage of slavery themselves.

«It makes you wonder like, «If you know a certain song is going to do better because it says a certain thing, but you kind of would rather say it a different way, but you're going to say it this way because you know it's going to do better, what does that do to our spirituality?»

The Superior may commit a fault in commanding you to do this thing or that, but you are certain that you commit no fault so long as you obey, because God will only ask you if you have duly performed what orders you received, and if you can furnish a clear account in that respect, you are absolved entirely.

The next thing you know they will have to stop the games or only hold them a certain times because there religion dictates it and we certainly don't want to offend the poor Muslims now do we.

Because we dare not speak for God presumptively (as you've seen some TV preachers do in pronouncing certain public events as unmistakably God's judgment for specific sins), we should pursue a reverent agnosticism about why individual bad things happen.

But in others we do not, because certain things are reserved for Jesus alone — creation, forgiving sins, judgment, separating the goats from the sheep.

I heard someone suggest yesterday that certain apocryphal material was left out because it wasn't profitable for the faith... Just made me think there were a few more things that maybe shouldn't have made the cut... (besides the obvious that those negotiators of the 3rd century probably didn't really care about not making Jesus a misogynist...)

I did that weird thing — like Edna Mode of animated Incredibles repute — because I was certain that anything called International Justice Mission had to be just as awesome as The Justice Leagueexploits of Superman, Wonder Woman and Aqua Man.

because I needed help.Long story short.I am a slow learner and need time to absorb info.I don't like to just touch subject matter here and there.I like to go chapter by chapter and that takes to much time out of peoples busy day.O well, God has all the time in the world, and I have till I die.because I was on the computer a certain day, at a certain time, looking for a certain thing.

According to the Hebrew Scriptures, the now - fallen human race (of two) was left alone to sort out its own destiny, but we get an idea of where things were going, because the Creator did express approval of certain individuals and used his holy spirit to give them help, guidance, and power, if they had need of it, e.g. Enoch, Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, David, Daniel, and the other ancient prophets.

So now I do not trust myself to tell me what is certain, as, being human, I am very adept at convincing myself to believe in things because I want to (or, sometimes, because it's what my parents and friends believe).

just because people belong to a group a certain «group»... doesn't mean that they are always following things to a «T»... there are probably things in your employee contract that you're not even aware of!!

I don't like classifying myself as any particular thing as I find it's restrictive, yes almost all of what I eat is technically vegan and gluten free, but I don't like being defined as a certain thing because I don't want to feel like I'm «failing» because I add honey to my rye bread or eat a barley salad because it's the healthiest thing on the menu!

When I do baking projects such as for the gluten free ratio rally I do get out all those more exotic ingredients because I want to produce the right chemistry for a certain item, but that is certainly not our day to day cooking / eating habits, and it is nice once in a while to be able to recreate some things... but replacing gluten is certainly not our every day goal.

but you get to show it off when it sits on the counter... second is to read the directions, because it does work a little differently than a regular mixer (you have to do things a certain way), not a big deal, it just seems like it was different to me.

So imagine this metallic round thing that you slather all around with batter, and then, I guess, suspend in artificial zero gravity and rotate, so your batter wouldn't drip down from it (as long as you don't rotate it too fast, because the centrifugal force would take over at a certain speed and you'll get Brownie Splatters all over the inside of your expensive zero - gravity oven).

I had to sub in a few things because I thought I had certain pantry items and I didn't, but I really loved the flavor.

Partly because I don't want to devote the time to that sort of thing, but mostly because it's not fair to pick certain recipes over others.

I think as consumers we should be wary of avoiding a certain product simply due to skepticism — it's one thing to recommend not using a product because it has scientifically been proven to cause harm; it's another to recommend not using a product because of subjective reasons, such as how creepy the fact is that X. campestris is the culprit of black rot on crucifers (or personal opinions of the FDA)... yes, X. campestris is used to ferment sugars to produce xanthan gum, but the fact that it causes rotting of crucifers is unrelated (and doesn't suddenly make xanthan gum harmful).

I feel similar feelings when I tell my mom about certain experiences or trips I have, and try to do what I can to treat her to her own special things, because she sure deserves it.

I keep offering them regardless because I want her to see they're part of a balanced meal but if she doesn't touch certain things we don't push it past asking her to try it.

Remys 1st, he was class according to some here, second match he is shit.just like the case some already saying he wanted us to buy jovetic just because he scored 2goals but did nt say the same thing when jove was in the physio room last season and will not reapeat it when he gets injured again.most here are quick to say «i clamoured for a certain player to be bought» when such a player is performing but none here would say» i was wrong» on their favourite players (that eventually flop) that we did nt buy.i think i am beginning to understand hafiz now when he named fans favourites: cisse, diame, capoue, victor moses etc..

I just want this window shut down, I don't give a damn anymore, because I believe I can't change anything but one thing is certain that, I am 100 percent Gunner.

Hlo as me JOSH all those transfers being made are all for nothing because Wenger can not mange to close the right player to play a certain team just see from the FA Cup which is the only league he can mange and placed the players he want the only thing is to sack him out then the club will start doing well that is my thought as a young Arsenal fan forever thanks am from Uganda

Officiating is the hardest thing in sports, but a lot of times referees don't blow the whistle because they have... let's call it respect, yes, too much respect for a certain team or player.»

Part of the general package of sporting superstition; the things that have to be done a certain way, every time, because otherwise nothing else works.

there is no doubting that Arsene has helped to provide us with some incredible footballing moments in the formative years of his managerial career at Arsenal, but that certainly doesn't and shouldn't mean that he has earned the right to decide when and how he should leave this club... there have been numerous managers at each of the biggest clubs in Europe throughout the last decade who have waged far more successful campaigns than ours yet somehow and someway each were given their walking papers because they failed to meet the standards laid out by the hierarchy of their respective clubs... of course that doesn't mean that clubs should simply follow the lead of others, especially if clubs of note have become too reactionary when it comes to issues of termination, for whatever reasons, but there should be some logical discourse when it comes to the setting of parameters for a changing of the guard... in the case of Arsenal, this sort of discourse was largely stifled when the higher - ups devised their sinister plan on the eve of our move to the Emirates... by giving Wenger a free pass due to supposed financial constraints he, unwittingly or not, set the bar too low... it reminds me of a landlord who says he will only rent to «professional people» to maintain a certain standard then does a complete about face when the market is lean and vacancies are up... for those who rented under the original mandate they of course feel cheated but there is little they can do, except move on, especially if the landlord clearly cares more about profitability than keeping their word... unfortunately for the lifelong fans of a football club it's not so easy to switch allegiances and frankly why should they, in most cases we have been around far longer than them... so how does one deal with such an untenable situation... do you simply shut - up and hope for the best, do you place the best interests of those with only self - serving agendas above the collective and pray that karma eventually catches up with them, do you run away with your tail between your legs and only return when things have ultimately changed, do you keep trying to find silver linings to justify your very existence, do you lower your expectations by convincing yourself it could be worse or do you stand up for what you believe in by holding people accountable for their actions, especially when every fiber of your being tells you that something is rotten in the state of Denmark

But there are things Cruyff never threw away neither did pep, lucho did throw certain things not because he doesn't have any sense but out of his love he reformed our style and gave us glory and results but in The way HE KNEW, valverde was under Cruyff, the man has made many positive comments about valverde, he isn't stupid, HE MADE us.

There are certain things you never do, because they'll throw off the rhythm and timing and could result in serious injuries.