But
do claims of this sort have a place in Christian Myth?
Not exact matches
Claiming deductible medical expenses could help you lower your taxes, so don't forget to save your receipts every time you shell out a co-pay or incur any
sort of unreimbursed cost.
As usual, the people (like yourself) that
claim they use science and facts
do nothing
of the
sort.
They
do, however, also argue that if faith came from ourselves, or was in any way something we
do instead
of God
doing for us, then it is in some way meritorious, and since that
does not jive with their understanding
of total depravity, then they must
claim that saving faith must only be from God, and not a response or action
of any
sort on our part.
For people whose faith
claims rest as resolutely on incarnation as Christian
claims do, the impact our own peculiarly incarnated lives have on the way we
do theology — and therefore on the
sort of theology we
do — ought to fascinate us.
«The trouble with this approach,
of course, is that despite the veneer
of civil religion, most people in America aren't worried about whether they break one
of the Ten Commandments now and then, and they certainly don't see the logic behind the
claim that infractions
of that
sort warrant everlasting damnation.
On the other hand, the theistic
claim that natural selection was God's way
of creating life (
sort of) doesn't vex evangelical materialists much at all.
The unlimited freedom
of everybody to
claim absolute freedom for everything works like a
sort of secret brain - washing by anonymous powers which
does not necessarily abolish freedom but narrows in advance the sphere in which the individual can make his free decision.
Whether something
of the
sort may be supposed to occur in the organic realm
does not solely depend on whether in the organic (sub-human) sphere, substantial formal principles essentially higher than the principles constitutive
of inorganic reality can strictly be postulated by natural philosophy, in the way
claimed by Vitalism rightly understood, as entelechies
of sorts, though
of course in themselves these could not be the objects
of perception, because a posteriori and experimentally it is only complete beings which are met with, never principles
of being as such.
For example, I don't know what
sort of evidence or criticism could be brought to bear on Mr. Farrow's
claim that only sexual difference, and not sexual orientation, is fundamental to human well - being.
Politically the first
sort of irresponsibility is manifest in the
claim of nations to sovereignty, that is, to their
claim to be under obligation to no power beyond themselves or to be justified in
doing anything that seems necessary to preserve national existence.
Or, instead,
do we have in his letters essentially the
sort of claims about Jesus and the
sort of devotion to him that Paul acceded to subsequent to the «revelation
of his [God's] Son» (Gal.
I
do not
claim to be a theologion or any other
sort of bible expert, but I accept that every word in it is true and inspired by God.
To those who
claim that improving gun control laws and restricting the sale
of assault - type rifles wouldn't
do a thing to keep this
sort of tragedy from happening: How
do you know?
How can we assume in any
sort of confidence that, even if there is a
sort of sentient being which is undetectable to us and capable
of doing even half
of the things many
claim it can, it gives a single moment
of its time to caring about us.
So, for example, T. W. Manson
claimed that `... if God
did in fact speak to us through the life, death and resurrection
of Jesus it is vitally important to know as fully and as accurately as possible what
sort of life and death and resurrection became the medium
of divine revelation», (T. W. Manson, «The Life
of Jesus: Some Tendencies in Present - day Research», The Background
of the New Testament and its Eschatology, ed.
Henry Murray describes «cognitive and convictional functions»
of myths, which must be credible to their adherents, though he considers these secondary to other functions.28 Even though a living myth is closer to daily life than to metaphysical speculation, it
does seem to presuppose some
sort of truth -
claims which can be examined.
But, that
does not stop our activist friends from making all
sorts of baseless and vile
claims about the technology.
It's just incredibly petty and desperate to
claim that 1 goal that you didn't even make any
sort of effort into.
Claiming to have some
sort of insider information from the Arsenal dressing room, Barton says that the Frenchman actually discourages players from
doing what many think is needed, blasting team mates for not
doing their jobs and rallying the troops.
It was noticeable to say the least, but the Frenchman played down the idea that he
did not prepare properly for the Liverpool game, but
claimed that his team, and especially some individual players,
did not have the right focus for the Liverpool clash because there was an international break about to start and, more importantly, there was all
sorts of speculation about who might stay or go in the final few days
of the summer transfer window.
If Arsenal are to make any
sort of success
of the new season, and prove Arsene Wenger and our CEO Ivan Gazidis right with their
claims that the Gunners
did well in the summer transfer window, then you would have to say that we need our Chile international star Alexis Sanchez to be firing on all cylinders.
And yes, statistics
of any
sort, particularly defensive football statistics, are opened to a host
of interpretations, the data we
do have on hand supports the
claim that Davide Astori was perhaps Roma's best defender this season.
you indeed
do represent a group
of idiots
claiming all
sorts of ITK factiods and truisms dredged from the yellow press BS you so eagerly swallow hook line and sinker.
I saw the documentary last week and I really didn't get the feeling that they were pushing homebirth, or that they were
claiming any
sort of definitive conclusions.
I
sorted through the many products
claiming to be registry essentials, weeding out items that I found to be complicated, overpriced, redundant, or that simply didn't work as promised until I had a streamlined list
of the best baby products for newborns.
Evers
claimed that the policy «gives the university the means to expel a student for participating in any
sort of protest,» and «
does not even provide a definition for the word «disrupt.»»
It is not, as some
of Corbyn's detractors have
claimed, the worst local election performance for decades (Ed Miliband's Labour
did a little worse in 2011 and William Hague
did significantly worse for the Tories in 1998) but it is the
sort of local election performance heralding failure at the next general election.
That bias can influence the
sort of secondary work Gould
did is a different and a much less surprising
claim than unconscious bias influencing actual measurements.
It's a mathematical way
of saying that the risk (R) associated with a possible discovery
of extraterrestrial life is a combination
of the danger
of the life if it
does exist (Q, which itself is the sum
of several other factors such as what
sort of life it is and how far it is away) and how likely the
claim of its existence is to be true (δ).
And two, although we don't have the data with the bioidentical hormones, we know from the Women's Health Initiative that estrogens were not the fountain
of youth that Suzanne Somers
sort of claims.
If you
do a quick Internet search you will find all
sorts of health
claims for amalaki, including healthy functioning
of the liver, heart, brain and lungs.
And then there are the times that references they use to back up their
claims do nothing
of the
sort.
Oats
do in fact contain gluten (some
claim it is a different
sort of gluten, and therefore should not be counted), and in australia products containing oats are subject to the same terms to be classed as gluten free as flour, barley and rye are (detectable gluten must be below 20ppm).
They usually
claim to
do the same
sorts of things — lower your appetite, give you energy, increase your metabolism — but the mechanisms are going to be different.
What to me is mind boggling: I stay lean despite eating as much as I want, whenever I want (which is naturally once a day), have no struggle with any
sort of cravings for non whole foods, spend very little time exercising, have better sleep than ever,
do not remember the last time I have gotten the flu, astounded my dentist as she
claims that my decayed molar has somehow magically healed itself over the course
of a year, have a HDL
of 90 and trigs at 30, my 25 hydroxy D level is at 75 without any supplementation... etc..
I've not got much experience being invisible though I can tell you stories about people who seem to resent tall women and will deliberately ignore them, as though my standing taller than those around me is some
sort of obnoxious
claim on something I don't deserve.
I am who I am, I have 3 son's two are grown and awesome, my youngest is12 and awesome.I'm not complicated but im simple minded I love music
of all
sorts I love to laugh.I'm not perfect but that's ok I
do nt
claim to be
As it is, the stilted
claims at auteurism (he's known as the master
of eye violence, mainly for a few juicy bits from The Beyond and Zombie)
do more, perhaps, to relegate his work to a
sort of camp gulag: the Siberia
of legitimate cinema, where adolescent tools congregate for midnight showings armed with irony and a crippling baggage
of disdain and contempt.
I don't feel quite fair
claiming this as any
sort of best
of list
of the year.
Cross got into a
sort of public debate with fellow comic Patton Oswalt for participating in the movie, which he
claims he
did so he could buy a house or something.
Note that I'm not
claiming to be an expert in any
of those things, but I've found that even minor improvements can (can, not will, I'm not peddling some
sort of ’12 Steps to Become an Internet Zillionaire») make a difference, and it doesn't take much time or effort to make those improvements.
I
do not
claim that there is any
sort of industry standard, or that everyone thinks the way I
do.
Amazon
claims that the new Paperwhite's faster processor should improve page turn speeds by 25 percent, but we didn't find that
sort of delta in our testing.
I'm sure it
does get muddier when it comes to traditionally published authors, although it's disingenuous to
claim or even to imply that midlisters or new authors are impacted the same as bestselling authors by these
sorts of fights.
Although both my insurance company and I know the plaintiff's
claim is a bogus one — the plaintiff is using one
of those personal injury law firms you see on late - night TV — and I know that my insurance company will
do its best not to pay anything at all, I am concerned that this
sort of public information could wind up on my credit report, even if I was to be paid a judgment in full.
Sort of hard for a creditor to
claim they didn't know the nature
of the funds in the account, right?
Numbers like «90 %
of professional investors fail to beat the index» get thrown around a lot, but even John Bogle doesn't make this
sort of claim.
While there may be reasonable arguments against CAPE,
claiming it's BS
sort of doesn't fly when your own peaches analogy seems a bit disingenuous itself.
Mr. Tilson thought
of himself (likely «thinks
of himself») as a great value investor, but that
claim didn't play out in his Tilson Focus Fund so he
sort of gave up and headed to hedge fund land.