Sentences with phrase «do disagree with you on»

I do disagree with you on your second point, though.

So much of what Marianne said and did I disagreed with on many levels.

«I do disagree with him on 90 percent of the issues on the planet,» Bell admits.

Not exact matches

In an interview with Rolling Stone, Canada's leader disclosed that while he disagrees with Trump on subjects like the environment and foreign policy, he also does not plan to «go out of [his] way» to prove him wrong.

Michael Hennessy, Telus's senior - vice president of regulatory and government affairs, expanded on that on Twitter, stating that while Telus disagrees with the OECD's methodology, it does support the bottom line.

«I don't disagree with that being a major problem,» Rubio said in an interview on Sean Hannity's radio show Wednesday.

A settlement means that we're going to not chance it to the jury to make a decision, we agree to disagree on whether anyone did anything wrong but we're making a practical business decision, we're going to pay this much to be done with this case and not test the waters.

«You can't have your head explode every time somebody does something you disagree with,» Rep. Chris Stewart, R - Utah, said during an interview on the latest episode of the Yahoo News podcast «Skullduggery.»

With ref to your thoughts on McClung's background etc — I don't disagree, but it's worth noting.

So on that point I don't disagree with my esteemed colleague Mr. O.

I don't disagree with John. Personally, I have a long list of things I'd like to see more public spending on (i.e. child care, non-profit housing, income support, public transit, student financial aid, etc.).

Mormons do believe in Christ, but Christians typically disagree with the Mormon's stance on Christ.

Well, I don't know if Obama has any tattoos, or skims money off the collection, or told anyone lately that they're evil and going to hell just because they disagreed with them, or has ever cheated on his wife with another woman, or man, so maybe he isn't your typical pastor, is that what you're saying?

So on the conservative estimate 99.5 % disagree with it's legalization and on the more liberal side — 95 % of the world doesn't like the practice.

He and Gingrich don't disagree on evolution and manmade global warming probably happening, but the ex-governor does have a firmer grasp on what's required to deal with the economic crisis of our time.

What is interesting is doing this work in community, where other people might call you on stuff, or heaven forbid, disagree with you.»

Do you really think that someone disagreeing with you on a blog is equivalent to being torn apart by lions?

As Muslim we don't need to be kissing asses to make the USA happy but rather we need honestly show them where we disagree with them so can reach an understanding based on respect.

Sorry to disagree with you but I have no problem with putting muslim «tradition» on the back burner and if you don't like it that's tough, heck, we didn't leave a single intact church steeple in Europe in WWII because they were used by enemy artillery spotters and snipers, why should muslims get a pass, Tradition did not stop muslims from dragging dead US soldiers through Mogadishu nor did it stop them from hanging contractors from under bridges, Osama's body should have been brought back and put on display is a glass box at all three of his sites, allowing those who wanted to view him ample time to do so.

You are most welcome to disagree with me, to pity me or hate me, but all you are doing is wasting energy (and precious time) on something you have no control over.

But what frustrates me on this blog are posters that make a comment by way of a sermon / declaration / pontification and then do not stick around to refute any replies that are made that the poster may disagree with.

Out of all the postings on this site today, I found «Derp's «post the most fascinating and informative, as well as deeply revealing.Even after boasting of what seems to be a practically perfect live by any measure, he informs us that he takes pleasure in mocking and ridiculing those of faith who are presumably his opposite; I can only wonder if, given all his supposed accomplishments, he is smart enough to realize how deeply revealing of his true character his remarks are.As a believer, I rarely engage in arguments with my atheist friends, and like to think I wouldn't lower myself to the level of juvenile name - calling and personal attacks against whatever my atheist friends hold dear.Most of the time we simply agree to disagree; when they hold forth with misinformation or ignorance on their assumed «knowledge «of my faith, I try to gently correct them; I certainly don't allow any disagreements we have to devolve into hateful insults and name - calling.

1) Do more research on what the Catholic Church has endorsed such as Obamacare (for which I totally disagree with the Church)

I remember disagreeing at times with both of them online (although sometimes also agreeing) I'm no - one and not even in the conversation anymore I don't believe and just spectate allot of what goes on these day's but I wan na own my own misogyny as I continue to try and unpick and leave it behind.

Certainly one can agree or disagree with Bethke's take on religion but it's difficult not to admire the way he has stirred up those of us who may have been slumbering comfortably in our own faith without really thinking about why we do what we do.

Recognition of the authenticity of one another's faith does not mean indifference with respect to the philosophical issues on which we disagree or the diverse actions resulting from those disagreements.

As expected, I don't agree with everything he says, but then, as you and I are finding, none of us agree on everything, and sometimes, we even disagree with ourselves over time....

But it does appear to be true that, as Dias wrote, InterVarsity will maintain doctrinal accountability by asking any staff who disagree with IVCF's conservative stance on homosexuality, same - sex relationships, and gender to inform their leadership, triggering a process of «involuntary termination.»

If Jeremy doesn't want anyone disagreeing with him on his blog, then he should say so.

Your spiritual experience is valid to me, and most Pagans don't think of other religious traditions as being «wrong»; we just disagree with anyone who thinks they have a stranglehold on the truth.

As you can see, Christians advocating for the preservation of slavery did not characterize their abolitionist opponents as simply disagreeing with them on the interpretation of the biblical text, but instead tended to accuse them of not taking the Bible seriously at all.

Though I disagree with Kerry Trotter about her (admittedly biased) speculation that perhaps Catholics understand humor best of all because they have «suffered better than anyone,» her example of St. Lawrence does shed light on a....

Most people who wrote me positive things about my blog had already a progressive theology and found some of my ideas useful while disagreeing with others, like I did on their blogs.

When someone disagrees with me, I usually say something like «Obviously we don't agree on this.

So, I guess I am wondering... as you obviously disagree with Jeremy on this doctrinal point, does that mean you get a pass on loving him?

There are many people I disagree with on many topics who I don't consider the least bit arrogant.

@Timothy — I don't recall using any foul, or even abusive words; unless you consider disagreeing with you, based on solid evidence, as being hurtful.

Paul never knew Jesus while he lived, and he openly disagreed on theological matters with guys who did, like Peter.

I don't think anyone will disagree with you (fundementally at least) on that point.

I think, though, we're all more used to it being done by people who generally disagree with you and most everyone here on most everything.

Interestingly, I don't recall you disagreeing with my take on God but rather a «word or two» I used in my description.

Does your atheistic worldview not make you disagree on legal matters and other things with those of faith?

I don't necessarily disagree with the Court's calculations on the value of the legal privilege to free democratic debate.

Jason, I agree with your assessment of some of the so called Christian religions out there that are not promoting the true gospel of Jesus Christ but I do disagree on one point.

As a Christian, I am aware that some other Christians, who love the Lord with the same sincerity as I do, disagree with me on this issue.

I was just making an observation on something I disagreed with — you don't have to get nasty about it....

I agree with him that «Israel's election was not just for a time,» and indeed I do not find much in his letter with which to disagree, other than to insist again on the importance of the Catechism's theology of Christ's saving work.

We read the Bible «through the Jesus lens» — which looks suspiciously like it means using the parts of the Gospels that we like, with the awkward bits carefully screened out, which enables us to disagree with the biblical texts on God, history, ethics and so on, even when Jesus didn't (Luke 17:27 - 32 is an interesting example).

On nearly every topic, the two authors disagree with each other in some way, but they do so with gentleness and respect.

An August 2010 poll by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press and the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life found that nearly half of Tea Party supporters (46 %) had not heard of or did not have an opinion about «the conservative Christian movement sometimes known as the religious right»; 42 % said they agree with the conservative Christian movement and roughly one - in - ten (11 %) said they disagree (based on registered voters).