Sentences with phrase «do dogmatic theology»

Catholics in the last fifty years or so have almost completely ceased to do dogmatic theology.

Not exact matches

He published the original version of The Identity of Jesus Christ: The Hermeneutical Bases of Dogmatic Theology in a Presbyterian adult education magazine called Crossroads in 1967, but it did not appear in book form until 1975 (Fortress), the year after he published The Eclipse of Biblical Narrative: A Study in Eighteenth - and Nineteenth - Century Hermeneutics (Yale University Press, 1974).

Mozart's music does not merely inform Barth's theology; Mozart, says von Balthasar, shapes the style of the Church Dogmatics overall.

This theology was «church dogmatics» - it had to do with the reiteration of the self - understanding of ecclesial existence.

That being said, the renewal of interest ought not to be overstated: much doctrinal theology in English remains preoccupied with keeping up a conversation with other fields of inquiry (often literary and cultural theory) and is so eager to do so that it often neglects the descriptive or dogmatic tasks of systematics.

If dogmatic theology really does prove beyond dispute that a God with characters like these exists, she may well claim to give a solid basis to religious sentiment.

It calls its conclusions dogmatic theology, or philosophy of the absolute, as the case may be; it does not call them science of religions.

To take an illustration which is particularly apt, as it does not involve any of the central problems of dogmatic theology, in Matt.

• Reviewing a batch of evangelical books on dogmatic theology (May), Carl Braaten, a Lutheran, didn't like at all Wayne Grudem's Systematic Ttheology (May), Carl Braaten, a Lutheran, didn't like at all Wayne Grudem's Systematic TheologyTheology.

It maintains that New Testament exegesis is important for dogmatic theology, and does not shirk from the tensions created by such exegesis for the proclaimed faith of the church.

To address the norms of congregational faithfulness is to do constructive dogmatic theology and moral theology.

Or is dogmatic or scholastic theology less doubted in point of fact for claiming, as it does, to be in point of right undoubtable?

We should beware that our interpretation of either the universe (science) or the Bible (theology) doesn't become so inflexibly dogmatic that it flies in the face of truth.