The question is, Why
do education policymakers and practitioners sometimes opt to make important decisions based on only one indicator?
Not exact matches
«A tax cap that is tied to an inflationary number that
does not reflect school district costs and which results in negative levies should raise concerns with both state
policymakers and the general public that want a quality
education for our students.»
Thus the NRC mantra, repeated with slightly different wording throughout the report: «Despite using them for several decades,
policymakers and educators
do not yet know how to use test - based incentives to consistently generate positive effects on achievement and to improve
education.»
Payne's book is brilliant and should be read by all
education policymakers, but today, in honor of Martin Luther King, I want to call attention to the Epilogue (as I have
done before), where Payne tells the story of William J. Moore, «grandson of a fugitive slave,» who opened a «first class elementary school» in West Cape May, New Jersey, for the black «yard men, delivery «boys», dockhands, truck drivers, casual laborers, and factory workers» who serviced the white tourists of Cape May.
Teachers and principals didn't manage to make the improvements in
education that the
policymakers claimed, but they
did precisely what was demanded of them: They raised scores.
Interested parties range from
education experts to parents, from teachers to
policymakers, all concerned with coming up with ways to educate all children, and to
do it well.
Mediocre PISA and TIMSS results plus persistent domestic achievement gaps have caught the eyes of
policymakers and
education leaders on both sides of the pond, as it's become clear that yesterday's so - so expectations just aren't good enough and that today's testing - and - accountability regimes
do not produce nearly enough world - class, college - ready graduates.
Policymakers, educators, and parents realize that, as Gene I. Maeroff argues,» «school smart» parents strengthen
education» (Commentary, Oct. 25, 1989), but they
do not know how to educate parents.
Although panels of scholars warned against using VAMS to make high - stakes decisions because of their statistical limitations (American Statistical Association, 2014; National Research Council & National Academy of
Education, 2010),
policymakers in many states and districts moved quickly to
do just that, requiring that VAMS scores be used as a substantial component in teacher evaluation...
How
do educational
policymakers and practitioners in various high performing and rapidly improving countries conceptualize their understanding of the goals and purposes of
education for an increasingly interdependent world in the 21st century?
Now, educators and
policymakers in that state are scrambling to determine whether and how to enforce the new law, a direct challenge to Plyler v.
Doe, a 1982 Supreme Court ruling that asserts that public schools must provide all students an
education, regardless of their immigration status.
But the consulting group has already established a national reputation for its ability to ascertain, scientifically, what needs to be
done in
education — and precisely how much it costs to
do it — through prior studies along much the same lines prepared for
policymakers in Kentucky, Arkansas, Arizona, and Wyoming.
If you train a different lens upon all this, however, you realize that you're looking at a badly messed - up system, one that privileges some kids over others, that extends rights to some citizens that others don't have, that invites finagling by both seekers and suppliers of educational services (and countless intermediaries), and that ends up being costlier than it needs to be, not to mention sitting substantially beyond the reach of
policymakers seeking to apportion scarce
education dollars across multiple legitimate causes, needs, and priorities.
For example, to simply recommend that educational curricula or assessments should reflect the author's six principles, or recent evidence from the science of learning,
does not provide
policymakers in state departments of
education the kind of granular analysis that would actually help them choose among the myriad offerings that all claim to reflect the latest research.
«Students that come to
do a master's in
education at Harvard are often motivated by principles - not just that they want to learn to be better
policymakers or literacy coaches - they come because they have a passion about what
education can
do for people,» Levinson says.
«He has a keen interest in how diverse modes of academic research can benefit
education practice and policy,» Faust added, «and how the concrete challenges facing educational leaders and
policymakers, as well as teachers and students, can helpfully inform the scholarship and teaching we
do here.
The studies themselves weren't designed to isolate any of those factors to measure their direct impact — and more research
doing just that is needed to give
policymakers a clear road map to success, says Grover Whitehurst, director of the Brown Center on
Education Policy at The Brookings Institution in Washington.
«There are many educators,
policymakers, and parents [to whom] it doesn't even occur... that civic and moral
education matters and that that's what schools are supposed to be about.»
For the first time, a dozen major
education organizations have pulled together their best practices and research to state these elements and help
policymakers, school leaders and the public understand why some schools succeed and how they
do it.
«
Education reformers and
policymakers take note: Catholic schools bring something to the table that charters don't....
If
policymakers limit ESA eligibility to a small number of students scattered around the state, they will help those students, but they will
do little to encourage existing
education providers to expand or new and innovative providers to enter the sector.
And what lessons
do Waterford's rise and partial fall in Los Angeles offer
education policymakers, not only in other states but also in Washington?
For educators and
policymakers across the country struggling to implement effective
education reforms in the context of increased accountability, the lesson of Chicago is that accountability can and
does encourage teachers and principals to pay greater attention to the lowest - performing students in their classrooms.
Additional articles on the challenges facing single parents and what
policymakers can
do to help can be found in the Spring issue of
Education Next.
Education policymakers were faced with the overwhelming question: How
do we fix this?
We hope to be talking a lot more with
policymakers, whether it's at the federal level or at the state level like Lindsey had mentioned, to see what possibilities there might be for any new kinds of programs or policies and really to educate those key stakeholders in terms of learning more about the different types, what
education savings accounts
do and how they can be useful for families.
It
does so in three ways: providing timely, useful information to
policymakers; advancing awareness among the larger public on complex
education issues; and highlighting effective models and strategies intended to improve student outcomes.
Yes, as he says in closing, «parents and
policymakers might
do a great deal to reverse the intensifying segregation of American public
education simply by educating themselves about what test scores
do and don't say about school quality... Questioning what they have long accepted, however, they might begin to create something different.»
What can
policymakers do to encourage a shift to K - 12 competency
education?
At the heart of this book is a simple message for teachers, administrators, board members, and
education policymakers at all levels: the key to success is not
doing more work and making more changes, but
doing the right work, and making the right changes.
Across the nation, the debate rages on among
policymakers, teachers and
education advocates:
Do parent - trigger - type laws have the potential to turn around underperforming schools when bureaucrats fail to act?
With this ambitious accountability plan in place, the Committee looks forward to working with community and business leaders all across Kentucky, as well as
policymakers, as we've
done for 35 years, to garner the commitment and resources needed to take the next giant leap in
education excellence — from the middle to the top tier of all states in this generation.
As Dropout Nation has noted ad nauseam, few of the accountability systems allowed to replace No Child's Adequate Yearly Progress provision are worthy of the name; far too many of them, including the A-to-F grading systems put into place by such states as New Mexico (as well as subterfuges that group all poor and minority students into one super-subgroup)
do little to provide data families,
policymakers, teachers, and school leaders need to help all students get high - quality
education.
In addition,
education policymakers need to look closely at what can be
done about the increasing turnover rates among beginning teachers and minority teachers, as well as in disadvantaged schools, which are traditionally among the hardest to staff.
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said teachers are often scapegoated to explain low - student achievement when
policymakers refuse to properly fund K - 12
education — and she doesn't appear to see unions as the driving force behind keeping less - than - stellar teachers at low - performing schools.
And in a recent report called «The
Education Transformation Project» authored by Steven Adamowski and other Connecticut superintendents, they wrote, «High quality expanded learning time in schools is a core strategy as
policymakers and educators recognize that the standard school calendar
does not fit many students» needs.
Although the states that adopted Common Core's standards
did so legally (usually by a vote of their state boards of
education), many state
policymakers deliberately minimized public awareness and discussion of the standards» academic deficits in order to ensure their passage and continue their use.
The framework is a broad outline of what students should know and be able to
do and was developed by the U.S. Department of
Education with the help of educators,
policymakers, and the general public.
Meanwhile,
policymakers and
education leaders don't need to wait for greater teacher workforce diversity to address the Black - White disparity in gifted assignments, Grissom and Redding wrote, pointing to how special
education assignments are currently made, in response to legal challenges.
Brandon Wright, of the avowedly right - leaning Fordham Institute
education think tank, opined in RealClearEducation that state officials «have understandably come to expect (and perhaps to welcome) being told what to
do by Washington,» and he argued that «state
policymakers crave and perhaps deserve the clarity and certitude of formal rules.»
School districts and campuses would be held responsible by
policymakers and taxpayers if they
did not provide a decent
education for every student.
To implement their plan, one of things Achievement First must
do is persuade Connecticut
policymakers to adopt
education reforms that will favorably position the Charter School Management company so it can expand here in Connecticut.
Having usually looked at these issues from the point of view that it's a bad thing for
policymakers to make promises taxpayers don't plan to keep, I'd never thought about how taxpayers» making unpaid - for promises to teachers could actually be a good thing for
education, raising their compensation on the cheap.
Although decent responses exist for every one of these concerns, as
do sundry ways of curbing their excesses, it's probably time for
education reformers and
policymakers to admit that just pushing harder on test - driven accountability as the primary tool for changing our creaky old public - school system is apt to yield more backlash than accomplishment.
We're passionate about making a difference in all we
do, whether it's guiding students along their learning paths; enabling companies to develop their workforce; fostering parent, teacher, and counselor understanding of student progress; guiding job seekers toward career success; or informing
policymakers about
education and workforce issues.
Even families who typically
do not have much time or opportunity to engage in
education can find ways to be involved in their children's academics with the help of school resources and initiatives.9 Then it becomes paramount for
policymakers, educators, and school leaders to know how their institutions can best design their practices and services at the secondary level to maximize postsecondary student success, especially for underrepresented groups.
Charter public schools can help meet the need for high - quality
education in Idaho, but
policymakers must
do more to help them find and fund facilities.
But the checklist
does provide a baseline of key information and impact assessments that help
policymakers and
education advocates consider the big picture.
As we have noted, in debates over higher
education finance,
policymakers often
do not consider tax programs such as the student loan interest deduction in tandem with spending programs.
Parents should
do all they can to promote these skills with their children, Dodge says, as should
education policymakers.