Sentences with phrase «do error correction»

«There's kind of a chicken - and - egg thing, as to do error correction you need a larger collection of quantum bits,» says Rob Schoelkopf of Yale University.

Not exact matches

And then follow your apology up with what you'll do to correct and learn from the mistake, because that turns an error into a course correction — and creates a culture where taking risks is not just accepted but expected.
If you do find an error, contacting the credit agency that generated the score is key to getting a correction.
And then there's The New York Times, that sterling vanguard of journalistic glory whose delightful blend of gravitas and (unintentioned) hilarity should be the standard for how factual error corrections ought to be done.
I don't have a solution to the problem, except to hope that the much — touted «free marketplace of ideas» will drive out the errors (hence my gratitude for Mr. Finn's correction).
CORRECTION: Due to an editing error, a previous version of this story incorrectly stated that the governor's office did not comment.
Pinpointing applications that don't require error correction is difficult, and the possibilities are not fully mapped out.
«Our sentence - comprehension mechanism is always involved in error correction, and most of the time we don't even notice it,» he adds.
There, however, activity did not correspond as closely with the magnitude of error in the participants» initial risk estimates, matching the poorer correction later.
And it's a sobering indication of how little Rainer's credentials count in the world at large that when Variety reviewed Privilege last year, it misidentified her as an «Afro - American» filmmaker and didn't deem the error important enough to run a correction afterward.
What can I do to make sure you feel very comfortable with your corrections from the errors you made on the test?
All books printed from that point forward will include the correction and you don't have to worry about throwing away all of the stock you previously printed with the error in it.
If you don't see it as an error the first time, your mind already makes the correction and you won't «see» it as wrong anymore.
Do not depend upon software for grammar check:: Grammar correction software can be misleading at times and fail to detect the errors.
If there is a spelling error, a simple finger press will bring up the correction, sending an email can now be at the press of the prominent top right - hand button, leafing through photos can now be done on the screen, as can some neat tricks like flicking through blog posts in the browser.
I did notice that error in the author's understanding as well... but didn't want to pile on the corrections.
Your date of birth and social security number should never change — but errors can and do occur and require correction.
Consumer report errors do occur, and a legal process exists to help consumers identify and request correction of information that is not accurate.
If you notice any error or any transaction you didn't approve, which may have a negative impact on your credit, you can bring this to the attention of the credit bureau to investigate and request for correction.
If you do not have a correction form, or can not locate a dispute submission area online, you can dispute credit report errors in writing.
For more information about errors on your credit report, other fact sheets and helpful information are available on our Web site: http://www.financial-education-icfe.org OR Send an email question to: [email protected] OR to inquire by regular mail, Send $ 1 and a SASE to: ICFE PO Box 34070 San Diego, CA 92163 - 4070 The ICFE's «Do - It - Yourself Credit File Correction Guide» 2006 edition is still available for $ 10.
And secondly, the correction of errors on your credit report is something you can do for yourself at no expense.
If you do find any errors, you can appeal to any one of the three major credit agencies: Experian, Equifax, and TransUnion for corrections.
If you don't teach your dog, it might still grasp it eventually from trial - and - error, but it will be really confusing for the dog in the meantime since it does not understand why it receives the correction signal.
They can issue corrections, but in this instant news era, the correction can never catch up with the original error, which is recycled forever (particularly if the error looks attractive to political operators — they will do everything in their power to keep the error alive).
r2 As to the «errors that have surfaced», I don't know what else to call them, since the BAS is listing «corrections», and I understand, because of your previous explanation on «Robust», that they have only to do with the AWS backup, which is why I referred to them as «minor».
It is the multitude of errors in the models which the modellers do not wish to admit to, not the corrections which they feel are necessary.
The ``... uneven spatial distribution, many missing data points, and a large number of non-climatic biases varying in time and space» all contribute inaccuracies to to the global temperature record — as do errors in orbital decay corrections, limb - corrections, diurnal corrections, and hot - target corrections, all of which rely on measurements (+ - inherent errors), in the satellite temperature records.
I haven't seen any real attacks on their methodology (other than the corrections that have been made), just «look, they made a 50 % error (actually 43 %), and other peoples» results fit our theory better, so don't pay attention to S&C anymore.»
I did some checking, and it seems to be more in line with the figures which were in Levitus et al 2000 (after correction for his maths error).
We could argue about whether or not «Calling for correction of factual errors in a student textbook is censorship», but the complaints made by FoE and James Hansen do not relate to matters of fact.
IMNSHO, # 2 is morally preferable — it's definitely more important alerting those misled by NASA's error than informing NASA itself (especially as Steve couldn't be certain that they'd do anything but ignore the correction).
It is clear that Von Storch and Zorita had been aware of the errors for months but did not publish an appropriate correction.
Had someone actually wanted to retrieve data off of those 9 - track tapes, they probably would have been unsuccessful anyway since magnetic tape degrades with time and tar files don't have any error correction built in.
I would also say that, although TOBS corrections are not done for all global data, the TOBS error uncertainty shown in this chart is probably present in most global data, as probably relatively few stations have an effective observation time of midnight.
If you do that, with enough stations, and the change in each is the same within a certain range, it seems to me that that gives you your correction with error bars for that change.
For instance, two that were based purely on global energy balance estimates, with climate sensitivity assumed to be 3 K; three did not themselves actually estimate global aerosol forcing; and one turns out to have used a model with a serious code error, correction of which substantially reduces its estimate of aerosol cooling.
@nic - lewis: Speaking of serious code errors - such corrections don't always tend to reduces the estimates of the negative aerosol forcing.
A study about method of error correction that does not alter results in a statistically significant manner should / can not be used effectively to refute the confidence in the data as known and understood.
-- internal discussions about NASA's quiet correction of its false historical U.S. temperature records after two Canadian researchers discovered a key statistical error, specifically discussion about whether and why to correct certain records, how to do so, the impact or wisdom or potential (or real) fallout therefrom or reaction to doing so (requested August 2007);
The regression does indeed show a positive trend for the atmospheric water vapor content, but when the AR1 correction is applied to the trend slope (TS) confidence intervals (CI) for the standard error (SE) the CIs include zero and thus we can not conclude that the trend is statistically different than zero.
Last, the folks at NOAA and NASA have shown that their preferred response to criticism is stonewalling, followed by grudging corrections (done with a very low profile, and no attribution to the people who discovered the errors).
``... Why do «error corrections» always seem to result in more warming than originally predicted, instead of less?
a Uncertainties (2 sigma) du to: data gaps and random errors estimated by RSOA (heavy solid); SST bias - corrections (heavy dashes); urbanisation (light dashes); changes in thermometer exposures on LAT (light solid).
But correction of the errors it pointed out did not substantially change the shape of the hockey - stick graph.
Cointegration takes into account that the two series have a unit root, so the analysis is done with a Vector Error Correction Model (VECM).
This doesn't leave very much time for error correction, upping the risk of a serious accident that requires measurable medical attention and recovery time.
The other members of the court (Simmons J.A. and Cronk J.A.) in separate concurring reasons, did not frame the proposition as broadly and cautioned that the jurisdiction to effect error correction will be precluded where it is tantamount to a reconsideration of the verdict or sentence or where issues of unfairness or injustice to the accused or reasonable apprehension of bias arise: (per Cronk J.A. at para. 60).
The correction of one error in the court below does not deprive the appellate court of the power of examining further into the record, and correcting any other material errors which may have been committed by the inferior court.
An adjournment beyond 28 days did not offend the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 (PCC (S) A 2000), s 155 as corrections to remedy administrative errors can be made outside the 28 day period — applying R v Annesley [1976] 1 All ER 589, [1976] 1 WLR 106.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z