Sentences with phrase «do everything you suggest»

For all this though, the toughest thing is doing everything you suggest in an ad with a grand total of 95 characters!

I did everything suggested to me and then some, and only saw my milk supply slowly dwindle overtime.

She did everything suggested to increase milk supply.

I did everything they suggested including sending the company (their template) an email.

The study also found that although 75 % of people who had seen safety advice also read it, 53 % did not act on it, although 53 % said they were already careful and 47 % said they were doing everything suggested.

You do not have to do everything they suggest, but you MUST pay attention to their issues!

So I did everything she suggested, and shortly after uploading my book to CreateSpace and Kindle Direct Publishing, voila.

If you did everything we suggest in these articles, you would make a lot of money — since you would be following most of our rules.

Not exact matches

The And model for introversion and extroversion suggests everything for them that the And model for fitness and strength does for its characteristics.

The quote suggests that if you do your hardest tasks first each day, even if you don't complete everything on your to - do - list, you will still feel fulfilled.

From the integration of media services like Netflix or «reading apps» from the likes of The Guardian, to the Like button that aggregates all of a user's online activity in one place, everything the social network has done over the past few years has suggested that it wants to be the go - to entry point of the Internet.

Type «Why do Jews ruin everything,» and Google will suggest you run ads next to searches including «the evil jew» and «jewish control of banks.»

It's naïve to suggest that funds aren't doing anything and everything possible to influence Morningstar's ratings.

«They liken themselves to salespeople, but everything they do about their business suggests that they're providing investment advice.

NBC News did almost everything in its power to support a suggested name change to «Fake News» on Thursday.

I suggest that as bright as you think yourself to be, that you do nt know everything, and that you consider that you can be wrong about this.

He suggests the negative votes came from four groups: people who reflexively vote «no» on everything; people who didn't like the «controversial» fellow chairing that session; people who accidentally pushed the wrong button; «and perhaps one or two who are secretly pro-choice.»

Case in point, it is not logical to suggest there is «good» vs «bad» if there is no ultimate moral authority, no higher power that created everything, including free will and the ability to choose whether to heed that drive to do what is «good» vs doing what you want to do at the expense of «good» and of other people.

I would never suggest that everything atheists do makes sense or is good, just as I hope you wouldn't try to claim everything Christians do makes sense or is good.

Someone who doesn't believe as you do would never agree, which suggests that it has EVERYTHING to do with what you believe.

A school is «theological,» I suggest, to the extent that everything done in its name has one overarching goal: more clearly to understand God and to understand everything in relation to God.

As William Johnson suggests, «transcendence has little to do with the nature and attributes of God but has everything to do with the consequence of God's activity in history, that is, to introduce a transcendent dimension to human life.»

To begin with, it suggests that the kind of leaders in power has everything to do with whether war is waged justly.

Finally, I would suggest that though one can't do everything in a single book, at a certain point the global ethic project must engage more fully and critically the various symbols and tenets of the great faiths.

Leviticus suggests that everything we do can have a sacred quality if we pay attention to the details and perform each act properly.

no peace, everything hinges on what YOU can do, but it is hubris to suggest you control or have a role in EVERYthing that happeeverything hinges on what YOU can do, but it is hubris to suggest you control or have a role in EVERYthing that happeEVERYthing that happens to you.

This analogy is not meant to suggest that God matures as we do, but it may point out how every actual experience that God relates to perfectly (because it is actual) enables God to bring that experience along with everything else to future relationships.

Despite arguing that Christians shouldn't expect others to follow their religious rules, phrases like loving people «in spite of everything» suggest that you are still judging people, doesn't it?

In this conversation between Ivan and Alyosha, we are in quite a different world from that suggested by Ivan's hypothesis as it is reported in the novel from time to time: «if God does not exist, then everything is permitted.»

15 I do not mean to argue that there is a «given» to be defended, nor that frameworks are not operative; but only to suggest that the reduction of everything to cultural frameworks can not work in a two - option world, for that reality to which a framework argument can apply would then be missing.

I think the author is displaying the best of being Jewish — critical thinking, questioning why she does things rather than just accepting everything with no questioning (which is very anti-Jewish in my opinion and seems to be what you suggest.)

I'm keenly aware that Americans don't vote for presidents based on their SAT scores, but everything I've read about Perry suggests that he's a genuinely dim kind of guy.

And it has everything to do, I suggest, with four themes that arise from the modern expression of Ockhamite nominalism: the deterioration of the idea of freedom into willfulness, the detachment of freedom from moral truth, an obsession with «choice,» and the consequent inability to draw the most elementary moral conclusions about the imperative to resist evil.

In short your timeline uses different scales for each day in an attempt to fit everything in, suggests events multiple times, claims events in order different to how they actually happened and just does not work.

Investigate the evidence yourself, there is nothing at all that truly suggests that the Big Bang happened, the only thing they have used in order to come up with the theory is that in their observances, the Universe appears to be expanding from a central point, it doesn't prove that a Big bang occurred, we know so little about the universe, that we don't even know everything about our own world, and you really believe that our science has figured out the riddle to the beginning of the Universe?

Scientists are people, they are flawed, and I'm pretty sure God did not provide us with the mental ability to fully understand how he pulled everything off, but either way, In General science spends it's time trying to figure out how God did it... not why... you want to know why... I propose to you, as you suggested I open another book and learn, i propose you open a Bible and learn why God Created you.

Others suggest that certain kinds of infinite regress are possible, so that because everything has a cause it does not follow that there is a first cause.

These slow cooker sweet and spicy meatballs are so easy to make that you are going to be shocked you didn't make them sooner.While I am usually obsessed with making everything from - scratch, this is one of the few recipes I suggest using store - bought meatballs.

Hi Nancy, I just did a quick search and found this: http://www.webmd.com/vitamins-supplements/ingredientmono-1224-CHIA.aspx?activeIngredientId=1224&activeIngredientName=CHIA (click on the side effects tab) I suggest researching it if it's a concern and of course everything in moderation.

Can't wait to try this one — I'd love to add some chicken like you suggested — do you think it would work okay to add chicken thighs in with everything in the crock pot?

everything there suggests he doesn't think there is enough.

Giroud is fine and he is all you suggest but he doesn't stretch defenses and makes everything tight.

And he also suggested that Arsenal having the chance of a record three FA cup wins in a row makes it even more important that we give everything to get past Hull tonight and then do the same against the waiting Watford at the weekend.

Are some of you on here missing a few brain cells as fans There is nothing Arsenal or Wenger can do with the Sanchez situation He wants to leave and has been offered 400k a week in wages who in their right mind is going to turn that down as a player As for blaming wenger who has been our most successful manager helped us build a stadium gave us 20 years of cl football and some of the best teams the ol has seen Including the invincible and you all have the Gaul to trash the man as if he has done nothing for the club I suggest you should look at the plastic fans in the Arsenal blogs that have created a toxic atmosphere at the club They attack their own players in a daily basis why would any top player come to s club where the manager the owners and players are shamelessly attached constantly Yet Wenger wins trophies regularly even them that is derided Look at Spurs Liverpool they win fuk all every year yet their fans back then Look at yourselves and all the negativity that you have created striking the club before you blame Wenger for everything I have been a season ticket holder since the 70s and never have I seen our fanbase been so full of entitled morons who have stopped backing the club and constantly deride the club snd attack it We have the worst fanbase in football you have made this great club a lagging stock in world football All you now us fans constantly moaning If you don't like Arsenal fc then buy out kronke and run the club or fuk off and support someone else You won't be missed Coyg

If you suggest Arsene wasn't at fault for everything done on and off the pitch then you're pro Arsene, anti Arsenal.

And as Sandro's hard tackle suggests, I think there's been a noticeable increase in «rah rah» posts so I don't think you can chalk everything to him just having paid social media consultants.

Although I am thankful and proud of everything Wenger has done for Arsenal, I don't like the way the writer suggests we only became truely great once Wenger came in.

Could Chelski be «gently» coercing him to move to Paris, by suggesting it could damage his rep and doing everything to stop him moving over to Us?

Having to face their two main rivals for the title in back - to - back weeks is brutal, but everything that they've done so far suggests that they're up to the challenge.

He is young but I don't think his development will take him nearly to Mahrez, for me I suggests we buy Mahrez, he has everything we want from a wide man.