Sentences with phrase «do fake reviews»

You can not do fake reviews.

Not exact matches

On Yelp's efforts to combat fake reviews: Certainly shady businesses or «reputation management» firms do sometimes try to buy reviews.

I don't agree with making a fake site and I believe made up reviews is entirely unethical, but I do agree with owning your own name and preventing someone from posting a site calling you a scam out of spite.

In at least one case, the authors of a retracted article claim they didn't use an agency and did not propose fake reviewers — which suggests the journal's editors invited the fake review instead.

Physicist Peter Chen (also known as Chen - Yuan Chen) of Taiwan's National Pingtung University of Education reportedly constructed an elaborate web of over a hundred fake e-mail addresses and used it to get some 60 papers — all now retracted — into the Journal of Vibration and Control, which apparently did not have sufficient control of its own reviewing process.

We do not include ClearZine before and after images into this review because it can be difficult to realize what is always real or fake online.

The 4 reviews before me must not have ordered the same dress i did, or they are fake reviews created by this company.

But from what I hear from JT and from reading reviews of dating sites on the internet is that they don't work, they're fake, etc..

Well, the easiest way to do this is to utilize reviews by experts who know how to spot fake profiles.

After doing so many reviews of cougar dating sites one thing that never ceases to amaze me is how clever some of these fake sites have become.

The XDating app does have four stars for iPhone, but that's only out of seven reviews — most of which seem fake.

Most of the reviews of UpForIt.com aren't very promising — complaints of fake profiles, computer generated messages and users that aren't serious about meeting didn't give us high hopes for UpForIt being any good as a dating service.

Over 90 % of the time when we do reviews the dating sites turn out to be a fake, a fraud a scam.

Today we are reviewing an app called BeWild (Be Wild) which is connected to SnpCupid dating app, and Bang Tonight App, both of which are fake, and both of which that we've done extensive investigations on.

You can tell a real review from a fake one because they're telling us that they don't like the app.

We have done a couple of reviews but not enough to expose all of these new fake dating apps.

I sent online-dating-ukraine.com a mail and they told me that they can do a. Previous story Anastasia Date Review are the girls real or fake there?

How is this a fake review site, when every review we do is 100 % honest.

In all the cougar dating site reviews I have done I have never seen such blatant dishonesty if these truly are fake.

The biggest question that needs to be answered when doing these review of adult dating sites is simple — is it a legit site or is it just a bunch of fake profiles?

The reason we know this is because we've done hundreds of reviews and using computer bots is a staple in the fake online adult dating industry.

Below is our fake dating list you can read through every review we've done or you can just do a search using the search box on the top right of this website to see if we have reviewed the dating site you're interested in joining, chances are we've reviewed it.

@seven7swords: nintendo paid for those fake awards and reviews and they wish they would have sold what pubg did and no one cares about the crappy old monster hunter games that have no texture and look terrible.

The most memorable are Raleigh St. Clair (Bill Murray), a bearded intellectual who has been married to Margot for years but does not begin to know her; Eli Cash (Owen Wilson), who lived across the street, became like a member of the family, and writes best - selling Westerns that get terrible reviews; Henry Sherman (Danny Glover), who was Etheline's accountant for 10 years until they suddenly realized they were in love, and such satellites as Pagoda (Kumar Pallana), Royal's faithful servant (who once in India tried to murder Royal and then rescued him from... himself...) and the bellboy Dusty (Seymour Cassel), who impersonates a doctor when Royal fakes a fatal illness.

These need to be honest reviews: you don't want readers to feel like your review was fake.

While I am glad to see the company doing something about the fake reviews and revenge reviews, they are making it more difficult in some ways for authors.

The REAL reason they are doing this is because Amazon is flooded with FAKE REVIEWS put up by Chinese troll farms, and Amazon's «Gold Box» is now just a clearing house for Chinese companies that pay money for product placement.

Lastly, the only dangerous situation that is being caused is by the people who believe they have a right to «don» a fake persona, and rabidly attack others on - line, simply because they have a point of view that someone doesn't like, or as on GoodReads they break the pseudo-golden rule of making a comment, any comment on one of their own book reviews.

In the case of positive reviews, some customers assume they are fake and don't put much weight in their opinion.

There are so many fake reviews on sites like Goodreads (both 5 and 1 star) that it's hardly a system to be trusted, and even when only professional reviewers reviewed books, it was still the opinion of someone I don't know.

The authors could have taken the easy way out and bought fake reviews (which, unfortunately, some authors do).

Kelvin — Mr. Locke isn't a great example, since he did it by buying fake reviews.

However, don't go out and actively solicit reviews from friends and relatives, and never post fake reviews or use any deceptive methods to try to «game the system.»

I was banned from STGRB because I called them for telling everyone to complain to goodreads about fake reviews when it was known GR was deleting accounts for doing just that.

Or they assume that those other 168 reviews are misleading and fake and this one 3 star review is most honest because it has been voted most helpful, by about 25 people who didn't read the book.

Although Amazon is on the right track, and of course you don't want fake or misleading book reviews (because they lead to MORE negative reviews from disappointed readers), as a professional author you also need to do what you can to counteract Amazon's overzealous review removal policies.

I've heard of authors receiving fake one star reviews the way my murder victim does in the story.

Perhaps the article isn't sending the not - too - subtle message that indie authors suck, thus their reviews must be fake, or at least suspect, thus the only way to save yourself the grief is to buy trad pub books, which have paid reviews from the shills who do it for a living... er... never mind.

His concern was, authentic reviews are rarely all positive, and he doesn't want to do bullshit fake positive reviews.

The decline overall in self - published titles is welcome for obvious reasons * and, that individual self - published writers are selling slightly more copies may indicate that legitimate marketing methods (that do not flood uninterested parties with unwelcome messages, that do reach target audiences and which do not contain pointless emphasis on fake / purchased reviews or bloated, meaningless «awards» rather than pertinent and honest content) are beginning to surface in this sub-culture.

The site is referring to fake reviews that were left strictly due to the author's political affiliation rather than anything to do with the book.

I'd heard of the issues with fake reviews and real ones that got caught up in the cross fire, but didn't realize how deep some of those fake reviews went.

I'm sure we don't manage to spot every fake reader review, but we've certainly found many over the years and they've been unceremoniously deleted.

But it begs the question: If a minor albeit prolific author like me who garners only a few reviews (if that) per book can be labeled as inviting fake reviews (I don't), how harmful could Amazon's (and ReviewMeta's and Fakespot's) bovine excrement algorithms be to authors with hundreds of reviews?

The only way you can succeed is by lying and buying fake «awards» and «reviews» and selling stuff to naive people who are outside of the writing world and don't know that now readers need to check publishers» IDs before buying anything.

They seem to think that they'll catch fake reviews that way and don't mind the collateral damage, but the collateral damage may be more than they thought.

And the fact that they don't seem to want to take the extra time to sort out real from fake reviews, even after someone writes to complain, is truly upsetting.

As stated above, most fake reviews are easy to spot, so you might think that these authors don't get any rewards for their unethical (and possibly soon illegal) behavior, but you'd be wrong.

What do you think I faked this whole video and review or something?

I can sort of understand the logic, you don't want writers who know each other writing fake good reviews, and you don't want spiteful writers writing mean reviews just to make another writer's book look bad, but I think Amazon needs to give more credit than that to writers as a group.