Not exact matches
Tony Dgee I think that the argument boils down to
nonbelievers not believing in God, but in chance which they know they can't depend on to act favorably, so they
do all that they can to bring about positive change
for themselves.
They
do articles like this
for two reasons: believers are interested in the stories and
nonbelievers like to get on the comment boards to vent their hatred of believers.
You are probably the same guys who want that mosque down the street from the center just because You like to upset people.here's news
for ya - you
do nt have to look at any religious symbols and you
do nt have to believe BUT you
do have to respect the majority and we will not be
nonbelievers because of you
No, all sin has been punished on Jesus, He was punished
for our sin remember
for the world the
nonbeliever and believer now the issue is Are we going to accept what Jesus
did for us or are we going to reject Him?
Sure they have unpopular beliefs on a variety of topics but that
does not mean that their pastors are calling
for the death of
nonbelievers.
What abandoning belief in the divine
DID do for many
nonbelievers was to make them realize that we're all playing the lottery of life, that misfortune often comes down to the luck of the draw.
The new testament quote
does apply to Christians, believers shouldn't marry or go into business with
nonbelievers... I agree it would not be wise
for a person of sound mind to marry or go into business with a delusional person.
So they're just trying to convert the
nonbelievers and legislate their god's rules
for the good of everybody — don't you see?
«
For when Gentiles [
nonbelievers] who
do not have the Law
do instinctively the things of the Law, these, not having the Law, are a law to themselves, in that they show the work of the Law written on their hearts, their conscience bearing witness and their thoughts alternately accusing or else defending them, on the day when, according to my gospel, God will judge the secrets of men through Christ Jesus.»
I find it even more annoyingly humorous how the paradox of atheist comment on a religious post that was not intended
for nonbelievers... if religion doesn't even exist, what
does it matter?
Aside from being sort of disrespectful to
nonbelievers and people of other faiths, allowing clergy to «give a brief benediction or comment» would make
for a very long ceremony, not only because so many religions would have to be represented but because so many members of the clergy don't know how to be «brief.»