Not exact matches
Rometty is no exception: She came to Big Blue as a systems engineer in 1981 after graduating from Northwestern with a degree in computer
science and electrical engineering at Northwestern and
doing a two year stint at the
General Motors Institute (a condition of her college scholarship).
But what a lot of people don't realize is that earth
science data and earth
science in
general goes way beyond climate change.
Fourth, to discuss order and purpose in nature, including man's place in nature, and in
general the intelligibility of natural processes,
does require careful attention to what the natural
sciences tell us.
I actually
do find evidence supporting Christianity and God in
general throughout history, mathematics, and
science, but you will call me blind nonetheless because you adore grouping people together to discriminate against them for actually comprehending something you can not fathom.
What
does the fundamental progress of
science consist in, except the discovery of the organic, structural value of what is most
general and everyday in our experience?
For example, after trying a number of definitions of mathematics, Whitehead settled in that article on Russell's definition of mathematics as the «
science concerned with the logical deduction of consequences from the
general premises of all reasoning» (MAT 291), In fact, the article «Mathematics» is the most accessible, most approving and best summary of Principia Mathematica ever
done by Whitehead.
But believing in the Bible as a fact of the Universe is a good sign that the person doesn't know much of history, comparative religion, philosophy or
science in
general.
Maybe you should go to a book store instead and visit the
science section... think of it as
doing this country and humanity in
general a huge favor.
The «seperated» U.S.A. has a president who was elected thanks to the christian right, who has gone to war after talks with a god, who opposes homosexuals although I don't think homosexuals in
general hurt him and who on religious grounds has opposed
science, wich could potentially help billions in the next few decades.
The world students» design -
science revolution may possibly result in a
general reorientation of world society's awareness, common sense, and intelligence which, just «in the nick of time,» will bring mankind into conscious promulgation of the
do - more - with - lessing invention revolution to be applied directly to gaining man's living advantage, which can accomplish the 100 percent physical success of all humanity in less than one - half the time it would take to occur only as the inadvertent by - product of further weapons detouring of human initiative.
I will agree with CJAs point that Catholics
do in
general accept the established theories of
science as God's plan for the ordering of the world.
Even the latest major theological empiricists — Henry Nelson Wieman, Bernard Meland, and Bernard Loomer —
did not have time to absorb the full impacts of the Kuhnian revolution in the philosophy of
science, the neopragmatism extending from Willard Quine to Richard Rorty, the Continental movements of hermeneutics and deconstructionism, nor the epistemological effects that accompany the
general demise of white, male, and Western hegemonies.
As one concerned with the philosophy of
science rather than philosophy in
general, I must take the latter view, recognizing that there is a great deal that
science does not and probably never will know.
And further, the so - called laws of
science are at best nothing but a statement of the observed
general sequences of behavior in those areas of the Creation with which they are concerned; they are, so to say, «statistical averages,» and they
do not cover everything.
I think
science will proceed in that
general direction, but I am not quite convinced that it will come to exactly the same conclusions as Whitehead
does — partly because I find it very difficult to make up my mind what those conclusions are.
But, and many people on this comment board serves as an example, if you
do not believe what a scientist (
science in
general) says..
Yet that would still not control our thoughts in detail, only in
general, for complete thought control is beyond even what
science or brainwashing can
do.
I don't have a newspaper article about
science in
general, and cosmology and evolution specifically, handy, and can't possibly include the thousands of reference to same here, so again, you got me.
Mormons are good people in
general, but that
does not exclude their belief is based on a «
science - fiction novel» (the Book of Mormon) as well as Muslims who based their belief on a «poetry book» (the Quran).
Scientists are people, they are flawed, and I'm pretty sure God
did not provide us with the mental ability to fully understand how he pulled everything off, but either way, In
General science spends it's time trying to figure out how God
did it... not why... you want to know why... I propose to you, as you suggested I open another book and learn, i propose you open a Bible and learn why God Created you.
«We will give them a sense of the kind of research that we
do, not only for stress - tolerant rice but also for other initiatives and rice
science in
general.
I still don't understand people's obsession with boxing players in to a specific role... The whole «true DM» is a dying breed, even Coquelin is arguably something else considering the advanced positions he takes up often in front of Santi and takes major risks in winning the ball back for us... IMO, the reason Coquelin has had such a successful integration into the first team is that he focussed incredibly hard on the basics of his role first and foremost before adding other elements to his game (long - balls, driving runs into space, more aggressive ball movement in
general) it's not rocket
science to tell a player to curb the attacking side of their game and focus primarily on defence before attack... Nor is it that hard to see that playing in a midfield pairing with either Ramsey or Cazorla is going to be different as well.
I don't know how
science journals work in
general, but in my field, papers wait months for review, acceptance, and publication.
Although our methodology is such that all children are taught the same curriculum, a child who is gifted in certain areas, such as in
science, music, or the arts, may go deeper or
do more advanced work within the
general classroom setting.
Top Trump campaign officials, meanwhile, played down the work of the data -
science company, which was paid at least $ 6 million to
do voter modeling and ad buys for Trump in the 2016
general election.
The Dean of the School of Health and Allied Sciences at Kwame Nkrumah University of
Science and Technology (KNUST), Dr. Addae Mensah says former President John Dramani Mahama may
do better than any other candidate in his party (NDC) in the 2020
general elections.
I would be able to relocate for the right job and would also consider working overseas.I'm not interested in scientific publishing or journalism, but I am open to wider suggestions as I am feeling quite disillusioned about research and
science in
general following my recent experiences.What can a 35 - year - old academic
do outside of
science and technology?Jeff
Sparked by Mark Changizi's article at the Huffington Post on «What to
do about all the crazy, ridiculous research» out there, the
general consensus was that sometimes what seem to be the most outlandish ideas are the ones that lead to the biggest advancements in
science and elsewhere.
The series tries to answer scientific conundrums posed by the
general public on the
Science Shack Web site; questions such as — «How
do flies walk on the ceiling?»
The requirements are in line with recommendations last year from DOD's Inspector
General, who concluded that the agency
did not have «adequate processes to identify unclassified export - controlled technology and to prevent unauthorized disclosure to foreign nationals» (
Science, 23 April 2004, p. 500).
I didn't have a burning passion for any subject in particular, rather an interest in biomedical
science in
general and perhaps too many outside interests to be prepared to dedicate my evenings and weekends, as well as my official working hours, to pushing back the frontiers of
science.
Since about the same percentage of all US citizens say they
do believe in a personal god, it makes one wonder what, if not their
science, leads the elite of US scientists to differ so dramatically from the
general population.
You don't know it all, so avoid marking the start of your job by expounding your opinions on the state of your industry, the company you are in, or
science in
general... unless you're sure you know what you're talking about.
She
does however, highlight that many scientists are quite skilled at presenting important and complicated
science in ways that make it accessible to a more
general audience.
Although it may be technically possible to analyze all of these samples, in
general it is undesirable to
do so, because forensic
science must not only be effective; it must also be cost effective.
And as far as I can tell, because I've had it repeatedly and rather pityingly told to me, to want to pursue the matter any further is an impulse that marks its sufferer out as a man who doesn't know an awful lot about physics, or
science, or the pursuit of truth in
general.
«Available research
does not support the claim that increasing
science literacy will lead to appreciably greater support for
science in
general,» the report concludes.
We don't want such divisions,» says Anindita Brahma, the
general secretary of the student council at the Indian Institute of
Science here.
As
general as the panelists tried to keep their advice, the questions had a predictable undercurrent: Those aspiring young scientists didn't just want to find out what it was like to work in
science.
In a 1997 speech, Neal Lane, then director of the National
Science Foundation (NSF), proclaimed, «The reality is, the
general public believes that we scientists
do want our work to be a great secret!»
«In
general, I think almost anything Hollywood
does with
science and technology, even if it's not quite right, is a good thing, because it's some level of exposure,» Perkowitz said.
«Official statistics
do not allow insights into this,» says Wedig von Heyden, secretary -
general of the German
Science Council (Wissenschaftsrat).
My plan is to make social
science more appealing to the
general public by
doing more video - related work, even though I hate having my picture taken, let alone being filmed.
► Finally, don't miss this week's
Science special issue celebrating the 100th anniversary of Einstein's theory of
general relativity.
In the cases, just this last couple of elections, where stem cell politics, for example, has been played out in the electoral process, stem cell research is [has]
done better than the winning candidates for offices; and I think, apart from that, I think that we
do have a serious problem in
general education of the
sciences and that accounts for the reluctance of a large segment of the population to accept the principles of evolution and think that there is still a debate about it, which there isn't — and that's a problem we need to solve, — but I still think there is an incredible constituency for
science in this country.
So, these questions I think can be translated for the
general audience, but we
do have an audience that is less skilled in talking about
science than most of us would like.
Moreover, researchers should be responsible for communicating their scientific outcomes to a
general audience and
do so in such a way that the concepts can be understood by nonspecialists, thereby improving the public's understanding of
science.
In the 1980s funding for
science shrank by 27 per cent, so there was
general agreement something drastic had to be
done to stem the malaise.
My fellow group is in
General Interest in Science and Technology and these are people who do public outreach and help try to bring science and technology, make it more accessible to people and the general
General Interest in
Science and Technology and these are people who do public outreach and help try to bring science and technology, make it more accessible to people and the general
Science and Technology and these are people who
do public outreach and help try to bring
science and technology, make it more accessible to people and the general
science and technology, make it more accessible to people and the
general general public.
Initially I didn't think that this topic was «big» enough for
Science, but I was always excited by the practical applications of this work and the
general biological implications.