Sentences with phrase «do get a higher return»

Not exact matches

«Small business owners should not worry about [a higher minimum], because they will get a higher quality of work, and your business will get much bigger returns from happier customers if you have happy employees doing a good job for you,» Nguyen says.

The first one I got was from one of our VCs, who said it was the highest return in a seed deal they'd ever done.

And if you can buy some business that earns high returns on equity and has even got mild growth prospects, you know, at much lower multiple earnings, you are going to do better than buying ten - year bonds at 2.30 or 30 - year bonds at three, or something of the sort.»

There is a way you can invest in both value and growth stocks, and you can do it strategically to get the highest returns possible.

We don't offer it because none of us think we'd get returns high enough to justify investing our own capital.

Nominal equity returns in high single digits don't get it done when your cost of capital is in the teens, but even more revealing is looking at the zombie banks in terms of risk - adjusted return on capital or RAROC.

Do you get a high - return on capital, growth and a shareholder friendly management?

And if the deal got done at a higher level (as it did) I'd make a high annualized return, because the deal would likely close within the next year.

They offer returns as high as 90 % on a trader's investment; who does not like the opportunity to get a return on investment like that?

Most do not want to return to a time when fathers owned their daughters and sold them to the highest bidder (Exodus 21:7; Nehemiah 5:5; Genesis 29:1 — 10), when multiple wives and concubines were a part of everyday life (even for men of God like Abraham, Jacob, and David), when women were forbidden from owning property, when foreign virgins could be captured as spoils of war (Judges 21), when a woman's lack of virginity could get her executed (Deuteronomy 22:11, Leviticus), when the stories of brave women like Tamar and Dinah and Esther and Vashti and Leah and Rachel emerge from contexts of oppression.

Now that the team around him has gotten better in his absence, I don't think it's silly for the Vikings to «hope» they get their return on their investment on the QB reports still say the Vikings still hold to a high standard behind closed doors.

Even though wingers don't get quite the same return as centers and dmen the fact that Tatar is cost controlled for 4 years adds value and would net a higher return than if he was awarded a 1 year contract.

If we had managed to complete our second half comeback against the Potters, then maybe the memory of that terrible half would not be quite so painful, but as it is, the rugby team got their chance to gloat and will come into the return match at the Emirates on Sunday with confidence high and with a belief that they can do the double over us.

Nothing like one underachiever blowing smoke up the ass of another... we know that Ozil has some incredible technical gifts, but to be considered the best you have to bring more than just assists to the table... for me, a top player has to possess a more well - rounded game, which doesn't mean they need to be a beast on both ends of the pitch, but they must have the ability to take their game to another level when it matters most... although he amassed some record - like stats early on, it set the bar too high, so when people expected him to duplicate those numbers each year the pressure seemed to get the best of our soft - spoken star... obviously that's not an excuse for what has happened in the meantime, but it's important to make note of a few things: (1) his best year was a transition year for many of the traditionally dominant teams in the EPL, so that clearly made the numbers appear better than they actually were and (2) Wenger's system, or lack thereof, didn't do him any favours; by playing him out of position and by not acquiring world - class striker and / or right - side forward that would best fit an Ozil - centered offensive scheme certainly hurt his chances to repeat his earlier peformances, (3) the loss of Cazorla, who took a lot of pressure off Ozil in the midfield and was highly efficient when it came to getting him the ball in space, negatively impacted his effectiveness and (4) he likewise missed a good chunk of games and frankly never looked himself when he eventually returned to the field... overall the Ozil experiment has had mixed reviews and rightfully so, but I do have some empathy for the man because he has always carried himself the same way, whether for Real or the German National team, yet he has only suffered any lengthy down periods with Arsenal... to me that goes directly to this club's inability to surround him with the necessary players to succeed, especially for someone who is a pass first type of player; as such, this simply highlights our club's ineffective and antiquated transfer policies... frankly I'm disappointed in both Ozil and our management team for not stepping up when it counted because they had a chance to do something special, but they didn't have it in them... there is no one that better exemplifies our recent history than Ozil, brief moments of greatness undercut by long periods of disappointing play, only made worse by his mopey posturing like a younger slightly less awkward Wenger... what a terribly waste

Additionally, a handful of books offer reduced juice, meaning bettors don't have to pay the standard -110 vig and therefore get paid a higher return on winning bets.

I'm def not tradin outta the first round unless I'm getting a high second and a 5th, that we don't have, or better in return..

We don't mind business men getting a return on their investment, but there's a BIG problem when the business men get what they want, but the paying customers (fans paying the highest ticket prices in the world) are being massively short - changed.

So you put yourself and your baby at very high risk of a bad outcome, and what does it get you in return?

The DCCC did, and didn't get any love in return from the protestors, who subsequently demonstrated outside a high - dollar fundraiser the committee held to benefit 15 House members seeking re-election this fall — including Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (even though the Arizona congresswoman, who's still recovering from her near - fatal head wound, hasn't said yet if she's running).

so instead of drugs or drinking i returned to the weights and juice i guess thats a drug lol in this last 2 yrs I've tried everything, to train like i was at the intensity at 28 uh not happening, Im at the point now where i got to be happy with me at 195 0r 200 cuz if i get any stronger I'm gonna get more achy and hurt, so my long ass point here is regardless of this routine that was posted the high reps will keep you lifting longer, as your pump issue i find natural or not its the time between sets that dictates the pump, Corey you and many other naturals have done it all and still don't look huge its genes id still be 170 or less i bet if it wasn't for juice but let me say i wish i didn't do it seriously i had a crappy sexdrive till androgel came out and now I'm only on 300 test a week, I'm done with deca and eq I've been reading or maybe looking for negative stuff and I've found it, Another thing is with this routine to go to failure and getting to heavy weights on so many sets i think will take a cns toll i feel like crap for the last 4 days i overdid it.

After Scotty Bowers returned once a young Asian escorts must get to find more high - profile interviews, travel a nice girl on the streets of people can not host the adult dating, phone sex, swingers, sexy body In the 1 Attractive indain male escorts and casual sex in the category Personals is the search titles only; has faced girl craigslist w4m date, there and similar to do outcall service about her booty let u don't feel at the best works at the best dating chat rooms for the First.

Fatih Akin — «In the Fade,» «The Edge of Heaven» Adolfo Aristarain — «Common Places,» «A Place in the World» David Ayer — «Suicide Squad,» «Fury» Nabil Ayouch — «Horses of God,» «Ali Zaoua» Siddiq Barmak * — «Opium War,» «Osama» Aida Begić * — «Children of Sarajevo,» «Snow» Emmanuelle Bercot — «Standing Tall,» «On My Way» Martin Butler — «Tanna,» «Contact» Patricia Cardoso — «Real Women Have Curves,» «The Water Carrier» Peter Ho - Sun Chan — «Dragon,» «Perhaps Love» Derek Cianfrance — «The Light between Oceans,» «Blue Valentine» Pedro Costa — «Horse Money,» «Blood» Garth Davis — «Lion» Bentley Dean — «Tanna,» «Contact» Lav Diaz * — «A Lullaby to the Sorrowful Mystery,» «Norte, the End of History» Carlos Diegues — «Orfeu,» «Bye Bye Brazil» Nelson Pereira dos Santos * — «How Tasty Was My Little Frenchman,» «Barren Lives» Nana Dzhordzhadze — «27 Missing Kisses,» «A Chef in Love» Ildikó Enyedi * — «Simon Magus,» «My Twentieth Century» Amat Escalante — «The Untamed,» «Heli» Safi Faye * — «Mossane,» «Lettre Paysanne» Tom Ford — «Nocturnal Animals,» «A Single Man» Goutam Ghose * — «Dekha,» «Paar» Jessica Hausner — «Amour Fou,» «Lourdes» Joanna Hogg — «Archipelago,» «Exhibition» Hannes Holm — «A Man Called Ove,» «Behind Blue Skies» Ann Hui — «A Simple Life,» «Summer Snow» Christine Jeffs — «Sunshine Cleaning,» «Sylvia» Barry Jenkins * — «Moonlight,» «Medicine for Melancholy» Alejandro Jodorowsky * — «The Holy Mountain,» «El Topo» Kim Ki - duk * — «3 - Iron,» «Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter... and Spring» Zacharias Kunuk — «Searchers,» «The Fast Runner (Atanarjuat)» Mohammed Lakhdar - Hamina * — «Chronicle of the Years of Embers,» «The Winds of the Aures» David Mackenzie — «Hell or High Water,» «Starred Up» Sharon Maguire — «Incendiary,» «Bridget Jones's Diary» Theodore Melfi — «Hidden Figures,» «St. Vincent» Kleber Mendonça Filho — «Aquarius,» «Neighboring Sounds» Brillante Mendoza — «Thy Womb,» «Kinatay» Márta Mészáros * — «Diary for My Children,» «Adoption» Takashi Miike — «13 Assassins,» «Ichi the Killer» Orlando Montiel — «The Son of No One,» «A Guide to Recognizing Your Saints» Jocelyn Moorhouse — «The Dressmaker,» «Proof» Kira Muratova — «The Tuner,» «The Asthenic Syndrome» Héctor Olivera — «El Mural,» «Funny Dirty Little War» Idrissa Ouedraogo * — «Tilaï,» «Yaaba» Jordan Peele * — «Get Out» Mohammad Rasoulof * — «Manuscripts Don't Burn,» «Goodbye» Eran Riklis * — «The Human Resources Manager,» «Lemon Tree» Arturo Ripstein — «Deep Crimson,» «The Beginning and the End» Guy Ritchie — «Sherlock Holmes,» «Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels» Anthony Russo — «Captain America: Civil War,» «Captain America: The Winter Soldier» Joseph Russo — «Captain America: Civil War,» «Captain America: The Winter Soldier» Mrinal Sen * — «The Case Is Closed,» «In Search of Famine» Cate Shortland — «Lore,» «Somersault» Peter Sollett — «Freeheld,» «Raising Victor Vargas» Juan Carlos Tabío — «Guantanamera,» «Strawberry and Chocolate» Rawson Marshall Thurber — «Central Intelligence,» «Dodgeball: A True Underdog Story» Johnnie To — «Election,» «Exiled» Tran Anh Hung * — «Norwegian Wood,» «The Scent of Green Papaya» Pablo Trapero — «The Clan,» «Lion's Den» Athina Rachel Tsangari — «Chevalier,» «Attenberg» Paula van der Oest — «Black Butterflies,» «Zus & Zo» Susanna White — «Our Kind of Traitor,» «Nanny McPhee Returns» Martin Zandvliet * — «Land of Mine,» «A Funny Man»

Most of those people had done it in previous years, so we have very high return rate when people get their individual results — which is one of the key aspects of the survey process, they get very detailed personal results, which brings them back.

This much we know: Mayor de Blasio gave in to the union's demands for sizable raises but got very little in return - no premium sharing of health - care costs, no higher co-pays, no guaranteed dismissals for ineffective teachers who don't even teach full time, no changes to the rigid seniority - based salary schedule, nothing.

Also, it gets people to buy the set today rather than the books one at a time tomorrow (if your situation is different than mine, and you don't have a high percentage of people returning for the remaining books in the series, this may be a particularly good idea for you).

Many people get tempted to try for the highest returns and sometimes they they really don't need them.

After all, if you're hiring someone to help you earn higher returns than you could get with a Couch Potato portfolio and they're not doing that, then you're not getting any value.

They want those high double - digit returns, but they don't want to pay too much to get it.

But I'd say the higher priority should be getting money into a tax - advantaged retirement account (a 401 (k) / 403 (b) / IRA), because the tax - advantaged growth of those accounts makes their long - term return far greater than whatever you're paying on your mortgage, and they provide more benefit (tax - advantaged growth) the earlier you invest in them, so doing that now instead of paying off the house quicker is probably going to be better for you financially, even if it doesn't provide the emotional payoff.

And one last word: from all the research I've done, I've found it's generally better to rent IF your rent is lower than average and you are confident that it won't rise any time soon, IF you plan on moving a couple years, or IF you can get higher - than - average returns from whatever you're investing your cash into (that is, the cash you would be spending on a down payment.

If I knew a high turnover strategy would get me early Buffet returns I'd just do it.

In high turnover in order to succeed you should have be capable to find so many profitable ideas and cut the unprofitable ones very fast, so it is much harder to do than say it... With low turnover you should be very good at investment, because as consequence you will concentrate in few positions in order to get high returns with low portfolio turnover.

I heard that we get higher returns if we do mutual fund investment directly than through online facilitators like fundsindia.

One thing that would be interesting to get your thoughts on, which I don't think you address in the post, is the real return of an account with higher portfolio turnover.

Does it mean we can redeem and exit from MF after 2 yrs to get higher return in %.

I am now getting to a stage where I don't need to take as much risk to achieve marginally higher returns (I will hit my retirement / lifestyle targets no problem) and having preservation of capital along with some growth is more important.

This makes it easier to do your research and make good trades, having higher chances of actually getting a return.

Dear Ajay, Investing for longer - period or shorter - period in Equity oriented products does not GUARANTEE you higher returns, the point we need to understand is given the fact that equity products have high risk profile, longer the time - frame the higher the probability of getting better returns.

Third, I don't get the last comment, except that the person does not understand that periods where lending is expanding usually offers the highest returns for risk assets.

And you have the opportunity to get a higher rate of return, based on how various stock markets do.

Tresidder doesn't want to pay off his mortgage early, because he can get a higher investment return.

Managements are nearly entirely devoted to squabbling over spending money, political fiefdoms, getting the most power or resources, maximizing their options which typically reduce return on capital, buying back stock at high levels (when rationally they should be doing a dilution arbitrage, so that investors who bought at rational levels would receive a positive return of cash provided by those who irrationally buy into bubbles), not buying back stock at low levels (when rationally they should be buying, to arbitrage the other direction), etc..

You don't get better returns by buying high dividend stocks, or dividend growth companies, meaning the companies are raising their dividends.

You don't have to worry that your investing strategy will go off the rails because a manager who runs a large - cap stock fund decides to get fancy and venture into higher risk small stocks to juice returns.

Yes, I agree it's not genuine growth, it is an asset bubble etc etc, doesn't help much though when you look at poor returns at the end of a year and realise that the doom - and - gloom picture was being wilfully ignored by those who rode the indices (perhaps in blissful ignorance) to huge profits while other saps spend time arguing about getting the economics dead right, and end up on the moral high ground but no returns to show for it.

That is why it is always suggested to start your retirement funds early in your life, to make sure you have enough time to invest in potentially high return stocks (with high risk), but when you get close to your retirement age, it is advised to do exactly the opposite.

If you were sitting in cash waiting to get back into the bond market, it backfired: the cost of doing so will be higher and expected returns lower.

However, if you were sitting in cash waiting to get back into the bond market, you got lucky: the cost of doing so will be lower and expected returns higher.

My good friend Mike Piper has written an article («Investing Based on Market Valuation») at his Oblivious Investor blog exploring my finding that the Old School safe withdrawal rate studies get the numbers wildly wrong (promoted recently by my other good friend Todd Tresidder) and the research done by my other good friend Wade Pfau showing that Valuation - Informed Indexing has for the entire 140 years for which we have market data available to us provided far higher returns at greatly reduced risk.

Search engines do a pretty good job of returning quality sites on this search, but occasionally some shady looking websites can get a high ranking for this term.