Probabilistic reasoning is the best way to think about markets, but it is very hard to
do in practice because we tend to get caught up in individual companies.
Not exact matches
I have no idea how widespread the
practice is at RIA custodian firms
because my firm's sole custodian, TD Ameritrade Institutional,
does not engage
in the
practice.
Because not only is this how to guide almost completely useless (we don't say completely because «practice regularly» is good advice) it is also nearly impossible to read because it is COVERED
Because not only is this how to guide almost completely useless (we don't say completely
because «practice regularly» is good advice) it is also nearly impossible to read because it is COVERED
because «
practice regularly» is good advice) it is also nearly impossible to read
because it is COVERED
because it is COVERED
in ads.
In a review co-authored in 2011 by Yale psychologist June Gruber, researchers found that the pursuit of happiness can actually lead to negative outcomes — not because surrounding yourself with positive people, mastering a skill, smiling, getting therapy or practicing self - governance aren't conducive to happiness, in and of themselves, but because «when you're doing it with the motivation or expectation that these things ought to make you happy, that can lead to disappointment and decreased happiness.&raqu
In a review co-authored
in 2011 by Yale psychologist June Gruber, researchers found that the pursuit of happiness can actually lead to negative outcomes — not because surrounding yourself with positive people, mastering a skill, smiling, getting therapy or practicing self - governance aren't conducive to happiness, in and of themselves, but because «when you're doing it with the motivation or expectation that these things ought to make you happy, that can lead to disappointment and decreased happiness.&raqu
in 2011 by Yale psychologist June Gruber, researchers found that the pursuit of happiness can actually lead to negative outcomes — not
because surrounding yourself with positive people, mastering a skill, smiling, getting therapy or
practicing self - governance aren't conducive to happiness,
in and of themselves, but because «when you're doing it with the motivation or expectation that these things ought to make you happy, that can lead to disappointment and decreased happiness.&raqu
in and of themselves, but
because «when you're
doing it with the motivation or expectation that these things ought to make you happy, that can lead to disappointment and decreased happiness.»
In practice, under that rule brokers can and do park clients in investments that are either absurdly expensive — often because they generate chunky commissions for the broker — or highly risky, or bot
In practice, under that rule brokers can and
do park clients
in investments that are either absurdly expensive — often because they generate chunky commissions for the broker — or highly risky, or bot
in investments that are either absurdly expensive — often
because they generate chunky commissions for the broker — or highly risky, or both.
WordStream reviewed the PPC activities of 500 small and medium - sized business client accounts and found that many businesses are not maximizing the value of their AdWords campaigns
because they
do not engage
in basic PPC best
practices such as actively managing their accounts, improving ad relevancy and engaging
in mobile optimization.
I would very much like to
do this strategy and I saw that
in your blog you have other articles on links bild, I'll take a look,
because your tips seem very interesting to
practice, I will understand what you are teaching.
«
Because our no - throttling rule addresses instances
in which a broadband provider targets particular content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices, it
does not address a
practice of slowing down an end user's connection to the Internet based on a choice made by the end user,» the FCC's Open Internet Order says.
So but the reason why they've come down I think is
because the actors who really wanted to you know promote their hard for a solution they would benefit by having a lot of transactions on the on the blockchain and they would benefit by having high transaction fees
because they would you know strengthen their narrative that things are very urgent but now that SEGUI has been merged even though
in practice right now it doesn't make that much difference
because in reality the network is not really congested.
So the next time a customer asks, «but doesn't Ken Fisher say he hates annuities» you can answer «no — not really
because in Ken's case he is motivated by good — good business profits, good shareholder returns, and regulation - free marketing and sales
practices.»
«Planned markets are sick markets, markets that are always
in crisis,
because their most - important social function — facilitating selection between competing pools of capital on the basis of what way of
doing things
in the real world works best
in practice, distinguishing between real capital formers and fools — has been disrupted by the planner's clumsy interference.
In fact, just because your organic keywords are now (not provided) in analytics reports, don't even think about stopping your SEO best practice
In fact, just
because your organic keywords are now (not provided)
in analytics reports, don't even think about stopping your SEO best practice
in analytics reports, don't even think about stopping your SEO best
practices.
Atheists: I know many there are many people that
practice religion just by fanaticism, I've seen many people
in my opinion stupid (excuse the word) praying to saints hopping to solve their problems by repeating pre-made sentences over and over, but there are others different, I don't think Religion and Science need to be opposites, I believe
in God, I'm Catholic and I have many reasons to believe
in him, I don't think however that we should pray instead of looking for the cause and applying a solution, Atheists think they are smart
because they focus on Science and technology instead of putting their faith
in a God, I don't think God will solve our problems, i think he gave us the means to solve them by ourselves that's were God is, also I think that God created everything but not as a Magical thing but stablishing certain rules like Physics and Quimics etc. he's not an idiot and he knew how to make it so everything was on balance, he's the Scientist of Scientist the Mathematic of Mathematics, the Physician of Physicians, from the tiny little fact that a mosquito, an insect species needs to feed from blood from a completely different species, who created the mosquitos that way?
preacherlady said, on November 5th, 2009 at 9:35 pm Fishon... thats as prejudiced a statement to condemn something
because it was written by a homosexual as it was to judge you
because you are Church of Christ -------- Alice, the Bible doesn't condemn being
in or of the Church of Christ, but it
does condemn
practicing homosexuality and as I said before, calls it....
It's
because you've wrapped your faith around your ego (and your ego doesn't like being told it's wrong), untangle it and get back to
practicing what you supposedly believe
in.
using your argument we would had civil rights
in this country just
because goverments make certain
practices illegal
does tat mean that what the goverrmet s
doing is moral and just, The fact s the goverment attempted to use Christaniaity to bolster it claim to power through this we have the start of the Roman Catholic Church one of the most insidious evil organzations on this planet which as
doe more to oppose ad kill true follewers of Christ then ay group o this planet.
Christians
in this country need to totally abandon the two corrupt parties we have,
because those who are seated
in the seats of making decisions will NEVER abandon their
practices, for their love of power and the love of BRIBE that comes abundantly to them from those who have means to give it,
in order to receive favors
in form of making our country's laws and policies to further allow them to
do their self serving
practice, disregarding those which they hurt by them.
So, just
because of the situation that someone was born into,
in your example a person born to Muslim parents
in a different part of the world than you, where that person took on the religous traditions and
practices of their parents (as many of us
do when we're children), and just never had an opportunity to learn about christianity and Jesus, again only
because of where they were born... you contend that person is going to «burn»
in an eternal lake of fire?!
do I need any approval before I
practice my religion,
do I have to prove my religion before I
practice, my holy book further describe that you must carry a gun
in 21st century
because there is too much crime
in this world, but it doesn't say much about if I migrate to another country these rules will still apply, Or I should modified them according to my comfort, like talking
in English which is not my religious language wearing pants or not, having education or not, standing
in line or not, I am so confused what should I
do can someone help me, should I go back to country where my religion originated or back
in time ask my guru questions about western world confusion, or just decide by myself what suites me, or preach other develop country that you guys are wrong be peaceful.
One parent households is
because these so called family value critics forget that you don't even
practice what you preach
in the first place.
I have even declined the opportunity to be more involved
in some progressive Christian events,
because labels like Emergent and Progressive
do not reflect my theological positions and
do not always FIT with how I see or
practice faith.
Should we say, as some inclusivists
do, that it is
because of Christ's saving mystery, offered to all, that salvation is available to the Hindu, for example,
in the sincere
practice of his or her faith — that
in Christ salvation is mediated to Christians through the church and to non-Christians through other traditions of faith?
Go ahead and say that I don't have a right to write a book
because I don't have the proper letters behind my name,
because I didn't study
in the ivory halls with that theologian you like to retweet,
because I don't have a properly footnoted thesis to back up the truth I know and
practice in my life.
While the source and the recipients of zakat are generally agreed upon, there are variations
in the
practice of distribution, largely
because most Islamic countries
do not have official collectors or an official organization for administering almsgiving.
And while some
do retain stability at this terrible price, many find their beliefs and values collapsing
because they have never been taught or exercised
in the
practice of relational power.
Eventually the Church moved to the forefront of abolition
because we understood this truth: Just
because the Bible contained instructions about how to treat slaves
in a context and culture where it was acceptable to hold slaves
does not mean slavery is a godly
practice or part of God's intended purpose for creation.)
Panthrotheism
does not discriminate or believe the bible is wrong,
in analogy no one can claim that our human ancestors are wrong
because they were naked or ate raw meats.We have now to accept that we are evolving.What is important that we survive.and still love each other
in general despite conflicts.No one is wrong
in believing and
practicing any religion that is pro life.Some people thinks that any contadiction to classical faith is wrong, un aware that humans survive the trials
in history was
because of change and adaptation,
in short evolution.its not anti religiom
Upon his election
in 1992, President Bill Clinton also spoke of a «New Covenant,» but the image
did not catch on — perhaps
because it ran into the conspicuously uncovenantal
practices of the Clinton presidency — and it was soon dropped.
He
does this
in two important respects: the first is
in regard to the standoff between the attempts to show that theology engages the whole person
because it is something «subjective» and personal and the attempts to show that it
does so
because it is something «objective» and public; and the second is
in regard to efforts to replace the picture of theology as a movement from theory to
practice by new pictures of the relation between theory and
practice.
the belief on the existence of the devil was concieved by theologians of the past thousands of years, there was no other way of explaining the bad experiences of people
in the past
because we were not educated yet to the kind of what we have now, Why this happened
because that was part of the learning process that God wants us to know,
in pathrotheism, we are part of God, and He himself is evolving
because He is the universe, We are now the conscious part of Him, our destiny
in accordance to his will also be His destiny
because it is His will.Although He prepared first all the material reality of the universe ahead of us, The experiences for us humans including the supernatural is just part of nirmal process for learning
because its natural process, today we reach a point of not believing the
practices of the past, but it
does not mean its wrong, Just like a child, adults loved to tell mythical stories to them,
because we knew children enjoys it as part of their learning process.
The sense of the prophetic ethic and morality is always something like this: «You shall refrain from this
practice, or you shall
do thus - and - so,
because I am Yahweh who brought you up out of Egypt [election] and you are a people voluntarily committed
in return to the performance of my just and righteous will [covenant].»
Orwin goes on to say that Liberal Democracy doesn't work like that
in practice because it actually assumes a particular conception of the good: «For so long as you observe prevailing liberal democratic norms on all fundamental social questions, you're free
in merely secondary matters to continue
in the ways of your ancestors.»
In any case, says Kanth, conversion did not bring liberation to the converted people from caste, because caste is not just a Hindu phenomenon but an Indian reality and is practiced by all religions in Indi
In any case, says Kanth, conversion
did not bring liberation to the converted people from caste,
because caste is not just a Hindu phenomenon but an Indian reality and is
practiced by all religions
in Indi
in India.
It's to Muslim living
in America to protest against Iranian Government
because they are free to
practice their religion
in America... Don't
do to others what you don't want that people do against you
do to others what you don't want that people
do against you
do against you..
But it seemed to elude this earnest man that polygamy
does not happen to be an issue
in his state precisely
because the law, for many years, has cast up serious barriers against the
practice.
It is men who have «taken what they want» and «discarded the rest» that embark on religious crusades, and pogroms, and persecution of their neighbors, and who
practice their pedophilic filth and perversion
in the Houses of the Lord
because their false idols of personal vaingloriousness tell them that everything they're
doing is somehow acceptable,
because they're
doing «what they feel is right», instead of
doing what they are told.
As much as I hate to agree with you on this, Edweird69, I have to
because I grew up
in a Christian neighborly atmosphere and school and saw nothing but the farthest thing of what Jesus taught us to
do being
practiced in those places by those folks.
We have become way too much eyeball people as Christians assume that those who don't live according to the way they
do they are unsaved, we have created this judgemental relationship which hurts peoples fellowship with God, there are no litmus tests for people that believe
in Jesus, which is why we are called to not judge others, and people use James 2:14, and 1 John's verse of those who
practices righteousness are righteous even though I think it's talking about earthly righteousness toward people that we as Christians should show
because there is a lost world out there that needs are help and these doctrines of guilt, condemnation, anger, and judgement aren't helping
in fact they are
doing the opposite, just like how
in James it's justification towards man.
Jesus is indignant that the scribes and Pharisees (1) will not enter the kingdom of heaven themselves and stand
in the way of others entering it as well; (2) will
do almost anything to win a proselyte only to make that proselyte twice as much a child of hell as they are; (3) confuse people by senseless oaths, telling them that if they swear by the Temple, their oath is not binding, but if they swear by the gold of the Temple, it is binding - the fools ought to realize, Jesus says, that the Temple includes all that is
in it; (4) tithe some of their money but neglect justice and mercy and faith, which are weightier moral matters, when they ought both to tithe and perform these greater acts of righteousness as well; (5) are careful about outward cleanliness but careless about the inward disposition, so that they are filled with extortion and greed; (6) appear righteous but really are hypocrites,
because their appearance hides all manner of iniquity inside; (7) pretend to revere the prophets of history whom their parents killed but continue to
practice the evil of their parents by rejecting those whom God sends to them now (Matt.
Because of the Jewish
practice, they had very good reason for believing that some unknown Jews
in Jerusalem had treated the body of Jesus
in exactly the same way as they would have
done with any other executed criminal, and thus buried it.
He was refering to the hypocrites who
do not
practice what they preach (
in this case, the pharisees of the New Testament era) and not
because all prayers should be private.
Part of me wonders if our resistance to telling the story is our lack of confidence
in recognizing that just
because Christians
practice the faith incorrectly and inappropriately at times doesn't mean Christianity is false.
They don't
practice it
in Israel, the Apartheid State,
because they know it «s a scam (from them).
[15] Focusing on the cup, Cyprian writes that he has been constrained to address this issue
because of the «ignorance or naïveté» of some people, who
in consecrating the Lord's cup and
in its administration «
do not follow the precepts and
practices of Jesus Christ our Lord and God, the Author and Teacher of this sacrifice» (1.1).
If the prophets speak on behalf of social and economic justice, they
do not preach a general abstract morality, but pointedly and specifically proclaim an election / covenant ethic, the sense of which is something like this: You shall refrain from this
practice, or you shall
do thus - and - so,
because I am Yahweh who brought you up out of Egypt (election) and you are a people voluntarily committed
in return to the performance of my righteous will (covenant).
Because it is education that must proceed indirectly by way of the examination of texts and practices whose study is believed to lead to understanding God and all else in relation to God, and because those texts and practices employ ordinary languages belonging to widely shared cultures and do themselves have cultural locations, such education is inescapably a public undertaking, understandable to anyone who understands the relevant languages and cu
Because it is education that must proceed indirectly by way of the examination of texts and
practices whose study is believed to lead to understanding God and all else
in relation to God, and
because those texts and practices employ ordinary languages belonging to widely shared cultures and do themselves have cultural locations, such education is inescapably a public undertaking, understandable to anyone who understands the relevant languages and cu
because those texts and
practices employ ordinary languages belonging to widely shared cultures and
do themselves have cultural locations, such education is inescapably a public undertaking, understandable to anyone who understands the relevant languages and cultures.
you sit there
in your home having nothing to
do with anything that happened, then blame someone else who is
in that same position for what happened, and he has to condemn it, and apparently he's guilty
because of his religion... and about «no other religious freedoms
in muslim countries»... you cant name a SINGLE muslim county that denies religious
practice... not a single, including saudi arabia... just
because they don't premit building religious buildings doesn't mean they don't respectively let you
practice whatever you want to
practice... unlike
in some WESTERN countries they are banning religious
practices such as; the headscarf!
We all
in practice assume that, when speakers raise their hands, thereby (among other things) changing the spatial location of the electrons
in them, they
do so
because they decided to
do so; or, if we take the speaker's hand gestures to be involuntary, we at least assume that they occurred
because of points the speaker had decided to make.
Similarly, if we are developing a relationship with a person, we know that we can't dump the gospel truck on them,
because (1) there is too much to share
in one setting, and (2) we don't know or
practice it all ourselves.
Aye, of course they
do,
because that was «the latest spiritual
practice»
in the youth of the people most likely to be on their deathbeds right now.