Sentences with phrase «do justice for his clients»

Not exact matches

Olivia is not ruled by justice or a desire to do good, but simply to do what her clients pay her for, which is to «fix» whatever problems they have, and these are often unsavory to say the least, mostly illegal, but worse, immoral.

Believing that anything done on behalf of his client is for the common good, Blake approves the organization of an «Angelo Chavez Society» to pay the boy's court costs and ostensibly see that justice is done in the face of small - town prejudice.

Now with recent regulations applied by the Foreign Tax Compliance Act to administrate cooperation between the US and Portugal, Miguel dos Santos Pereira, Founding Partner of SPASS — Santos Pereira & Associados — Sociedade de Advogados, SP, gives us great insight into the developments of the Portuguese justice system, how they achieve the best outcomes for their clients and representing for white collar crimes.

Know that the client is someone who truly needs your expertise and is in a position financially that if you don't help they won't have someone who will fight the justice system for them.

The personal injury lawyers of The Sasser Law Firm are passionate about seeing that justice is done for their clients.

The Clekis Law firm in Charleston, SC remains committed to putting clients first and to fighting for justice in each personal injury case we work on as we have done since 1989.

On the civil side, lawyers for both plaintiff and defendant breach their duties to their client if they put the interest of justice, or some other person, ahead of their client interest without instructions from the client to do so.

``... The principle of fundamental justice which recognizes that the lawyer is required to keep the client's confidences — solicitor - client privilege» and «[a] client must be able to place «unrestricted and unbounded confidence» in his or her lawyer; that confidence which is at the core of the solicitor - client relationship is a part of the legal system itself, not merely ancillary to it» given these two statements in the case of an ABS does this mean that non-lawyer owners / managers would be restricted from accessing client files — in other words, who would «own» the information in a client file when a solicitor is working for an organization with non-lawyer ownership assuming that the solicitor - client privilege doesn't apply to the owner (s) or does this privilege apply to non-lawyer owners as well?

Our dedication is to justice for our clients, and we are prepared to do whatever it takes to see that you are provided the justice you deserve.

We believe true justice is not just fair compensation for our clients but also making sure those who hurt our clients understand what they have done.

The Barreau du Québec has issued an in - depth report calling on lawyers to transition away from hourly billing — not only to enhance efficiency for corporate clients but also to foster greater access to justice for individual clients and provide a more balanced professional life for lawyers.

This is not to suggest that either report did not deserve a place on the agenda in any event but civil justice, while forming the centre of professional life for lawyers and their clients, has little purchase with politicians or the civil service.

From the point of view of this class — a class I'll just call «lawyers» — it's too clear for argument that (i) law has things to do so that some instrumentalist theory has to be adopted; (ii) few things are simple, so that no single theory will work in every case, whether it's «wealth maximization», «corrective justice», «contract as promise», compensation or deterrence; and (iii) the demands of practice, the solicitor's need to create relations which will be projected into the (uncertain) future and to control the risks his or her client faces, the barrister's need to conduct litigation at a price the parties can afford and in the context of the adversary system, powerfully limit the consideration that a lawyer can give to theory.

Regina v. D.J. (2008) Client acquitted of Kidnapping, Forcible Confinement, Aggravated Assault and Conspiracy to Commit Assault in the Ontario Court of Justice pursuant to skillful cross-examination of witnesses and legal argument by Ms. Stacey Nichols which revealed that Crown case did not meet required standard for conviction.

Scanlon continued, «As President of the Illinois Trial Lawyers, I will do everything possible to help our members in pursuit of justice for their clients.»

As the LGBTQ community acquires new rights and responsibilities, lawyers have the opportunity for new revenue streams as they engage the civil justice system on behalf of clients who previously did not have equitable access.

We believe in putting the client first and will do everything in our power to help you receive the justice and compensation you deserve for your injuries and damages.

Where the company refuses to do what is right, he is ready to take the case to court to win justice for his client.

We believe in the work you do for your clients, and our mission is to assist you in finding justice for injured individuals throughout the nation.

I enjoy what I do - working within our civil justice system to help obtain for my clients a fair and just resolution of their case.

It went through a hard - fought suppression hearing, where my client risked the enhancement for obstruction of justice by doing the unthinkable, challenging the veracity of a federal agent.

And as Larry Ribstein has repeatedly pointed out, it doesn't say much for our criminal justice system that the government is paying witnesses to testify against Lerach for the crime of paying his class representative clients.

We have a lengthy track record of doing what it takes to seek justice for our clients — even when that means a protracted legal battle.

The attorney takes the risk, does all the work and collects a percentage of the settlement in return while the client receives justice, quality representation and a settlement to compensate for damages and injuries.

Here at our law firm, we understand the pain and suffering associated with pedestrian accidents, and we do our best to obtain justice for our clients.

In our fight, we are determined to get our clients the compensation and justice they deserve, and we'll work tirelessly to try and hold individuals and entities responsible for the harm they have done.

He regularly travels to some of the most remote circuit courts in the Province of British Columbia to ensure that fairness and justice gets done for his client.

Despite this, individualized justice does come for my clients every so often.

«What we're hoping to see is a continued recognition of the fundamental importance of solicitor - client privilege to the administration of justice, and the sweeping away of provisions that provide for privilege to be breached in circumstances where the client doesn't even get an opportunity to address the protection of that privileged information.»

Justices Wagner and Gascon, rendering reasons for the Court in Canada (Attorney General) v. Chambre des notaires du Québec, 2016 SCC 20, underscored the importance of solicitor - client privilege, not only in the judicial system, but also in the legal system.

Lawyers can do pro bono work by providing direct legal assistance to low - income and disadvantaged clients, and by providing representation to organizations that serve those clients or advance the larger cause of making the justice system fair and accessible for everyone.

Beyond assisting our clients with their claims of actual innocence in court, we also strive to shed light on the problems in the criminal legal system that allow innocent people to be convicted of crimes they did not commit by advocating for greater accountability in the justice system.

As his case results show, Attorney Glotzer is a seasoned negotiator, investigator and litigator who is dedicated to finding justice for his clients and will do whatever is necessary under the law, including going to trial, if it is in his clients» best interests.

This involves leaving no stone unturned as we investigate what caused an accident, how we can seek justice under the law for our clients, and what we can do to prevent the particular accident from happening again.

This session will help further equal justice for diverse client communities or workplaces by providing advocates with technology tips and tools that can help them do their jobs more efficiently and effectively.

[24] In response to Justice Watson's reference to Bob Cratchit's coal, I would point out that the disbursement claimed in these cases is for access to the legal databases and is based upon the time spent doing research for the particular client on the particular matter.

The ombudsman approach does not involve representing a client, an adversarial process, or a legally enforceable decision, yet it results in fair treatment for individuals from public authorities — administrative justice.

Lawyers who subject their feelings to a critical reading may thus find that clients do not seek rescuing, but, in fact, have actively resisted oppressive structures and have developed many tactics, goals, and alliances with larger communities that can be engaged in the struggle for social justice.

For that reason, while we know the bright line rule still applies, and we have the four factors relevant to assessing its scope, we still do not really know what it means for lawyers, their clients or the administration of justiFor that reason, while we know the bright line rule still applies, and we have the four factors relevant to assessing its scope, we still do not really know what it means for lawyers, their clients or the administration of justifor lawyers, their clients or the administration of justice.

Her clinical work is deeply connected to her research and community activism as she believes that working for social justice is a natural extension of the work therapists do with their clients.