Sentences with phrase «do legal research if»

Not exact matches

The reason why the classification is so significant, is because if a drug is labeled «Schedule 1,» that means it is almost impossible to do any sort of legal clinical research on the drug, and no (technically legal) prescriptions can be written.

If you can't see this, I can only hope you will consider consulting with an actual legal expert before explaining what you do not understand and refuse to research beforehand.

So again, if you feel comfortable nodding yes to these marketing considerations, maybe do the research to understand the legal concerns specific to you or your proposed attack.

«We did our own research in Canada in terms of are the markets the same, does the pricing work the same, if there was a wrongful act in the United States, did that same act take place in Canada and therefore would the same legal claims exist?

If you decide to go it alone, do your research by sitting in on some traffic ticket trials or visiting a free legal clinic.

If you are not the type of person who enjoys legal research in your free time, or don't have patience for translating wordy statutes and confusing case laws from around the country, then this might not be for you.

Then there's the part 2 of the remit, which doesn't address legal or institutional compliance but asks if CRU was meeting best scientific practice in its ways with data and research findings.

Prof. Bainbridge says that as far as he can tell, these days law schools hiring professors focus almost solely on qualifications that do not have a «goddamn thing to do with the practice of law» such as «having a PhD» or «having multiple publications, even if they demonstrate the author's utter lack of doctrinal knowledge or inability to do basic legal research.»

For example, legal research could be done far more competently and cost - efficiently if provided by such a support service.

Or, if you are changing locations or jurisdictions, take some time to do some research on your new legal community, new applicable rules / statutes, etc..

Missing however, from the self - congratulatory posts, rationalizations for incomplete case law databases, and the unfulfilled promise of expanding its meagre coverage of secondary, was any realistic critique of what had been achieved and what remains to be done if it is to become a useful tool for legal research.

Moreover, modern students will better grasp the structure of legal research if the process itself is described as fluid and flexible.81 Because they did not grow up using books (for legal research, or for anything else), they have no print framework for research to begin with.82 So, as a threshold matter, it is quite unlikely that they need to «see it first in print» in order to understand the complex web of legal information that they confront electronically.83 And because they are accustomed to receiving an array of information contemporaneously, a linear model is unlikely to resonate sufficiently that they will internalize it as a valid means of navigating the process.84 Instead, a broad and flexible paradigm is a better fit.

Imagine a new kind of legal research system that can gather much of the information you need to do your job — a digital associate, if you will.

So if you're practicing labor law in St. Louis, want to incorporate a business in Branson, or just need to do some legal research from the right side of Kansas City, FindLaw has you covered — and it's all free and mobile - friendly.

And if students react to seemingly irrelevant print lessons by failing to internalize foundational concepts, then they will likely revert to old research habits when they inevitably gravitate back to electronic sources to do their actual research.88 In other words, if the process doesn't carry over to the media they're actually willing to use, then they are far less likely to actually learn the fundamental, foundational concepts that are so critical to good legal research.89 Instead, they may achieve mere «inert» knowledge: «the inability to apply skills and concepts in situations other than those in which they were originally learned.»

For if the inclusion of other domestic legal systems in the research does not per se change its outcome, the principles thus derived would enjoy greater legitimacy thanks to the effective demonstration of their worldwide recognition by nations.

Instead, it should highlight the possibilities for future empirical legal writing scholarship and offer enough of an introduction to inspire new empirical researchers.1 Even if you do not plan to conduct your own empirical research, this Article should make you a more informed consumer of empirical scholarship.

2 - Will you bill me more if you have to do «extra» work; i.e., researching legal issues, writing legal memoranda, arguing motions, rejecting unacceptable offers from prosecutors and judges and making additional court appearances, or even trying the case in a jury trial.

Take it even if you don't love legal research.

Kosa believes if lawyers are not relying on certain types of AI software to help with legal research, they're not doing their job as efficiently as possible because of the numerous benefits the technology serves in increasing accuracy, precision and speed of compiling data.

What follows in this post are some initial thoughts on what I think is a fairly important topic for law librarians and legal researchers: (a topic I might consider researching in detail if I ever were to pursue a doctorate in information studies): what, if anything, can be done to lessen the anxiety that legal researchers suffer during the research process?

Legal research can be tricky so make sure you are looking at material for your jurisdiction (don't look up what you need for a restraining order on a California legal website if you live in Nova ScoLegal research can be tricky so make sure you are looking at material for your jurisdiction (don't look up what you need for a restraining order on a California legal website if you live in Nova Scolegal website if you live in Nova Scotia!)

And speaking of advancements in legal research, we now have the Fastcase app, which is free and, even if you don't have a Fastcase subscription, you can use it to conduct research using your mobile device no matter where you happen to be.

This free app is available for iPhones, iPads and Android devices and allows you to conduct free legal research on the fly, even if you don't have a Fastcase subscription.

If this study were re-done today, what percentage of matters referred to lawyers do you think would be found to require legal research?

A great example of how this year's legal trends report is helping inform our roadmap is if we look at the consumer research we did.

Sorry if you thought I am writing a «Who does legal research anymore, anyway?»

That being said, if everything becomes available in electronic form, what is stopping a talented person in another country from doing Canadian legal research?

Nika Kabiri: It is, and on top of that, even if you don't have a legal issue... The American Psychological Association does research on stress on a regular basis, and they found that eight out of 10 people, whether they have a legal issue or not, eight out of 10 people experience moderate stress every day, so add that to a legal issue and then the fact that they actually are dealing with the issue.

But even if you don't subscribe to Fastcase, make sure to download their mobile app, since it provides free access to Fastcase on your mobile phone, allowing you to conduct legal research on the go.

«If an app does not seem to be of legal research quality, it might not be included in our database, but other than that, we are trying to include whatever we can find that we think a lawyer might want to access.»

Ah yes — but mine would be a law school rant, which gets us back to other posts about how the otherwise splendid new graduates couldn't do legal research, if their lives depended on it.

When I'm helping students with legal research after they have done their interviews with a firm, one of the things I sometimes ask them is if the firm asked them how proficient their legal research skills are.

The problem really boils done to the reality that legal research is very much a skill, and like any skill if you don't practice and use it, then you will lose the skill and have to relearn some of it.

Questions were raised about how much students get out of blogging, especially in writing short pieces (if that is all they do), and Moin gave a strong defence of the merits of having students blog on a common theme over the course of several weeks as an organic, multi-faceted approach to legal research and writing.

Personally I don't mind my email address being given out, it's fairly public knowledge and a bit of marketing research would find it quite quickly but I understand the value of a name and email address if legal IT is new to someone.

If you would like additional legal research assistance, please do not hesitate to call the reference desk at 305-284-3585, e-mail us, or visit the library.

The injured party could do some legal research to determine if there's a case.

• If you don't wish to meet with a student clinician, you are welcome to drop by and use our self - help computer and library to do online research and work on legal forms.

Well, just like when I did basic legal research (as a naive young associate), I scanned the search results to see if they had any useful verbiage, or otherwise provided helpful clues.

If it doesn't, the tag line ought to do the trick: Citeright.net: «We make legal research faster, cheaper and less awful.»

16 years I have been doing this I have never been as excited about it as I am right now, which, if you are in the legal research business, that's a very dangerous thing for everybody else.

As part of a recent piece of my own independent research I asked senior in - house lawyers and heads of legal: «If you read a publication that doesn't seem to offer an insight or grip the issue, does it affect your view of that practice group?».

If you're not an expert researcher or if you don't have access to a large law library with professional foreign and international law librarians, the key to productive legal research is the «Legal Research Guide,» most of which are created by those professional and expert law librarians, many of whom also have US and foreign law degreeIf you're not an expert researcher or if you don't have access to a large law library with professional foreign and international law librarians, the key to productive legal research is the «Legal Research Guide,» most of which are created by those professional and expert law librarians, many of whom also have US and foreign law degreeif you don't have access to a large law library with professional foreign and international law librarians, the key to productive legal research is the «Legal Research Guide,» most of which are created by those professional and expert law librarians, many of whom also have US and foreign law deglegal research is the «Legal Research Guide,» most of which are created by those professional and expert law librarians, many of whom also have US and foreign law research is the «Legal Research Guide,» most of which are created by those professional and expert law librarians, many of whom also have US and foreign law degLegal Research Guide,» most of which are created by those professional and expert law librarians, many of whom also have US and foreign law Research Guide,» most of which are created by those professional and expert law librarians, many of whom also have US and foreign law degrees.

Also, if the situation has unique issues, the lawyer will do legal research to prepare for those that need to address at trial.

had there been a defence lawyer rules say they cant hide case law they know about -LCB- they would discover more if defending -RCB- in hope that we don't discover it = unethical.type in» stare decisis and techniques of legal reasoning» Which also says it is unethical and intellectually dishonest for a judge to ignore case law that stands in the way of his decision = the defence wont give case law and the judge wont do defence lawyer research - so case law / evidence will not be heard and will not be there for a SRL to use / defend our case.

Be aware, if you come to do any legal research at one of the LD libraries in the UK, that whilst we have a broader collection of e-resources than ever, where and how you use some of it is still constrained.

If I can do anything else that doesn't involve this [focus on legal research and case law], I will give it a shot.

If you want to concentrate on legal research and writing, do you need your own Lexis or Westlaw / WestlawNext subscription?

OnPoint Legal Research may disclose your personal information if required to do so by law or legal proLegal Research may disclose your personal information if required to do so by law or legal prolegal process.