Sentences with phrase «do lie on their back»

When they do lie on their back, it's hard to give them that contained feeling.

You can also do this lying on your back.

Your goal should be to become independent with these exercises and that is why we demonstrate how to do them lying on your back, sitting and standing.

This can be done lying on your back or standing, and eventually you will be able to perform them in any position.

I'm on day 5 and can see / feel a difference already doing squats / crunches planks tho do u lie on your back when doing them or front

Not exact matches

She's more emblematic of the 1990s than of the 2000s, but remember this: Martha Stewart bet that by not appealing her conviction (for lying to prosecutors, in case you forgot) and by simply getting her five - month prison stretch done with in March 2005, she would minimize the damage to her reputation and quickly get her company back on track.

Most of the people in Feldman's studies don't even realize all of the lies they have told until after the conversation when it was played back to them on video.

Thoughtful, reflective persons are on the near side of this great modern divide, and I don't think they can go back to premodern ways of thinking, about values as well as religion (any more than they can go back to thinking that the world is flat or lies at the center of the universe).

Even though Jeezus said he was coming back before his generation died out and then failed to do so, they MUST HAVE MEANT something else... like... oh... gee, what can we make up to fit because Jeezus couldn't have been lying or else our religion will fall apart... oh, it MUST HAVE MEANT the entire population of Jews forever and ever on the face of the planet!

The biographical note at the back of Eight Whopping Lies, Brian Doyle's latest and last collection of parcel - sized personal essays and achingly beautiful reflections on being fully alive, fully Catholic, and fully human, says that he was the editor of Portland Magazine at the University of Portland, in Oregon, just so you don't confuse it with that other Portland which is, not was, on the other side of the country.

I do sympathize as the choice is to follow logic to the conclusion that god most likely does not exist, and by so doing break your heart by learning that those you love and care for have lied to you, and the other choice being turning your back on logic and choosing self delusions.

It's difficult to blame Ozil for the difficulties he's faced at Arsenal without looking at the big picture... like the fans, he too was lied to by Wenger... there is no doubt in my mind that he was told by Wenger that he was trying desperately to recreate our earlier success by acquiring players that fit the system he ran when Henry was in his prime... as we know this hasn't happened... in order for Ozl to flourish he needs some speed up front, forwards that can make intelligent runs, a boss in the midfield to compensate for his obvious defensive liabilities and defenders who can transition from defence to offence quickly and efficiently... much like he had in Real and with the German National squad... unfortunately he ended up on a squad that has a striker who plays with his back to goal, very few intelligent runs into the box, minus Sanchez, no one to take pressure off him in the midfield, once Cazorla was injured, average defensive midfielders around him, which simply highlighted his lacking defensive qualities and defenders who lack the necessary cutting edge when it comes to transitional passing... instead of blaming Ozil, which is simply too easy, especially considering his mopey disposition, we should be asking ownership and / or Wenger why they brought him in if they didn't intend on doing what was necessary to get the best from him... can you imagine Ozil playing with the likes of Henry, Viera, Petit and Pires, it would be incredibly to watch and even more difficult to stop... so the only thing different between his experiences in Real and with the German team versus his time at Arsenal are the players around him and we all know who is in charge of making those decisions, the Grinch who stole soccer

Cazorla — too bad he was lost too soon... not blinded enough to think he would solve all of our ills but he was and is the only deep - lying player on this team that can pass more than 12 yards on a consistent basis... like Rosicky, gone way too soon but can't dwell on it too long or we end up in the crazy world of Wenger's man love for the one and only Diaby... don't resign because even if he were to come back he's been out to long and he just gives Wenger an excuse to not replace with talent

Not going to lie: I did the thing friend of the program Andrew Sharp suggested way back in 2011 and screamed «FAROOOOOOOOOOUQ» on this dunk.

I don't think he's a feature back (last year proved that), and I'm not advocating that the Cardinals turn him into one — plus the results don't lie with Chris Johnson — but Ellington is such a dangerous weapon on the ground and through the air that it's been a little odd to see him become little more than a player that comes in to spare the starter a few times a game.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

wenger has made the club profit this window i would have though as well all incomings have been covered out goings and other revenues coming in like c / l monies and squad releases wages being saved i bet we are in a + balance if we went through it properly we do nt know what the budget is so it could be worst there now way wenger has spend # 100 not even # 70 million transfers ospina = covered by the sales of miquel and monies made from cesc to chelsea so nothing really spend there debuchy = covered by the vela money chambers = covered by the vermalen sale # 11 million only goes up to # 16 if he does well in certain circumstances sanchez = covered by the c / l monies and no doubt what we are owed on previous player sales i.e cesc to barca and song monies still outstanding welbeck = covered by wages being freed up and the rest of outgoing transactions and previous player sales being owed so there we have most likely recoup most if not all of our transfer monies back and shafted and lied to puma and the emirates about spending there monies in sponsorship on tranfers and pocketing in» profit» aprox # 60 - 70 million of the transfer funds to boot wenger hang your head in shame

When Wilshere is fit then I think he could make a great deep lying playmaker, someone to sit alongside Coquelin and good enough to make a long pass to link the def to attack or step past a player and then pass the ball, Wilshere has done fantastic for England when playing a deep lying playmaker and he has been able to rely on his CM partners to get the ball back.

The game should have been killed off in the first half, we got ta learn to park the bus and not put ourselves under needless pressure, a good game but Arsenal still lacking at the back, if we had drawn or lost, that fault lies well and truly at our defence, Good to have Walcott back and a great goal, but all of that would have been wasted, anyway well done our boys, shame about the PL losers our gain, bring on the final!

You've said it all.Arsene really does some poor business sometimes.We could've have also gotten Lacazette for cheap last two seasons.Funny enough people here said he wasn't worth that price at that time.Fast forward today and he's our record signing.Where lies the sense in that?However, I disagree on the Lemar part.Monaco were never willing to sell Lrmar or Mbappe on the cheap this season.To Monaco those sre their most important players.Even stats will back me.

Absolute joke with the sale of ox and Gibbs we have made money gazidis wenger lied to are faces again we have some extremely wealthy men at are club and Stan is on about spending 3 billion on the rams for a new ground if any one still backs these muppets it's time for u to get out of are club with them if it means I have to take a banner every week to get these idiots out that's what I'll do bring back David dean please

He knew that if he failed this time, if he didn't play well enough on the Penn Circuit to get back up to the Grand Prix, it meant that he would turn out like his father: teaching country - club ladies in dainty dresses, lying to them that their backhands looked improved....

But does the Ireland Under - 21 international's future really lie away from Watford, or would a loan move be the best option to get his career back on track?

I appreciate that they'll no doubt have comfy «lie - flat» beds on the way there and back, but nothing substitutes your own actual bed, does it?

(Don't make the mistake of wearing a dress like I did, or you'll have to lie back with your undies on display!

«We don't have science to back it up that a kid is not going to be lying on a psychiatrist's couch at age 18 saying, «Doc, I'm messed up because my mama let me cry myself to sleep.»

To do this one, just lie flat on your back and hug your baby to your chest.

(And don't feed her while she's lying on her back because she may choke.)

While you do a traditional push - up (toes on the floor, legs and back straight, elbows bent), your child can push up from his knees or just lie on his stomach and straighten his arms.

If you don't like what is served at school, pack a lunch for your children. Parents should be responsible enough to pack a lunch. They are lying on the lunch applications. Parents don't need to provide any documentation when they fill out the lunch applications. PACK A LUNCH if you don't like what the government is providing to your children or go back to your country.

If lying sideways to feed does not help, try lying flat, or almost flat, on your back with the baby lying on top of you to nurse.

There are certain poses you shouldn't do while pregnant, such as lying on your back in corpse pose when you have passed your first trimester, and most poses have appropriate modifications for your growing belly.

As for his patients who would choose a hospital delivery, they were well - known for making things «difficult» for hospital staff: refusing to be «shaved», have enemas, (both still standard procedures in 1981) and wanting to do unthinkable things like get up and walk around during labor instead of lying (preferably) on their backs or sides strapped to a fetal monitor - all with the encouragement and blessing of their doctor.

It is so comfortable that it means I don't wake up with back ache from lying - down night feeds, and it's softer on my head if I have to ditch the pillows due to close proximity of a small child.

I'd second those who say use your own body as the best place for tummy time, whether that's lying on your back with baby on your belly or baby in a sling (although I think the former probably does a better job of teaching baby to work against gravity).

The first few times I tried her on my back, she didn't know what to expect so she wiggled quite a bit, but now that I put her on my back daily, she knows what to expect and lies quietly on my back until she is all secure.

Whether your baby lies on his back or tummy, there is plenty to do and see with this toy.

i'm glad that you had satisfying hospital births and received the care you and your babies needed, but i do think that we as women should know that we have other options besides a hospital birth or that we can have a water birth or that we don't have to lie on our backs (the worst position for birthing) as some doctors require, if that's what we so choose.

And don't lie on your back, since that increases the pressure (and therefore the pain).

Sleeping on the chest is considered a favorite position of many children and all parents recognize that the baby sleeps better when lying, so they don't turn the baby back.

If lying sideways to feed does not help, try lying flat on your back with the baby lying on top of you to nurse.

Moms do not like lying on their backs in labor because intuitively they know it's not natural and it creates more work for the uterus which moves forward and upward.

He did nt mention anything about lots of them looking exactly the same, he had a really good play with a couple of twin girls and loved all the double buggies, he is a fan of twin club now Fridays scan was a proper, long scan to check the growth of both girls, the scans are getting more and more uncomfortable now as its so difficult to lie on my back, but my consultant is just such an excellent sonographer (compared to all others who had a go at scanning before) that the whole thing is ok, painless and swift, even though not rushed!

But you can do a few other things to help prevent a flat head instead, including carrying your baby when he or she is awake, offering lots of supervised tummy time during those waking hours, and limiting the time your baby spends in a car seat or otherwise lying on their backs when not sleeping.

What to do: While your baby is lying on her back, hold the toy in front of her face and, if needed, wiggle it slowly or gently touch her with it to get her attention.

Women can figure out for themselves if lying on their back makes them uncomfortable, and avoid the practice if it does.

One of the most important things to be aware of is how difficult clothes might be to put on a squirming baby, for instance clothing that fastens around the lower back and bottom can be difficult to do up and if there are large buttons or bows around the middle back these may be quite uncomfortable for the baby to sit or lie against making them irritable.

Rolling side to side slowly when changing, helping her slowly transition up and down from sitting to lying down and back up again on changing table, encouraging reaching for toys when on hands and knees so that one hand is off the ground without collapsing, playing «row row row your boat» on your lap moving side to side and having her hold those tricky sideways positions are some examples of things you can do during the day to help her get used to lateral weight shifts.

It doesn't help, however, that even lying down on her back is complicated as hell.

This breastfeeding position involves your baby lying on his back, while you crouch over him on all fours and dangle your nipple in his mouth.4 Some mums say doing this for short periods helps if they have conditions like mastitis and don't want their breasts to be squashed or touched; others claim that gravity helps unplug blocked milk ducts, although there's no scientific evidence to support this yet.