Essentially,
we do life side - by - side.
Not exact matches
«The practical
side of me wants to say, «Don't buy stuff you can't afford,»» said Katie Brewer, founder of Your Richest
Life in Garland, Texas.
I've had people in my
life who to some extent ran the business
side of my
life, or at least were partners and associates who thought in business terms much more than I
did.
Nothing in
life is
done with one
side of the brain.
Once I learned all about the business
side of things, the pair (who, by the way, have inside jokes and act like old friends), told me they were going to Google the next day to
do a
live Hangout video chat with the tech blog Mashable.
I see founders who think they can be at every conference, advise multiple companies,
do side investments in angel deals, leave the office at 6 pm and have a balanced
life.
Apart from the founder's or CEO's entrepreneurial role, his (or her)
life as a spouse, partner, parent and community member needs just as much focus as the front
side does.
[16:00] Pain + reflection = progress [16:30] Creating a meritocracy to draw the best out of everybody [18:30] How to raise your probability of being right [18:50] Why we are conditioned to need to be right [19:30] The neuroscience factor [19:50] The habitual and environmental factor [20:20] How to get to the other
side [21:20] Great collective decision - making [21:50] The 5 things you need to be successful [21:55] Create audacious goals [22:15] Why you need problems [22:25] Diagnose the problems to determine the root causes [22:50] Determine the design for what you will
do about the root causes [23:00] Decide to work with people who are strong where you are weak [23:15] Push through to results [23:20] The loop of success [24:15] Ray's new instinctual approach to failure [24:40] Tony's ritual after every event [25:30] The review that changed Ray's outlook on leadership [27:30] Creating new policies based on fairness and truth [28:00] What people are missing about Ray's culture [29:30] Creating meaningful work and meaningful relationships [30:15] The importance of radical honesty [30:50] Thoughtful disagreement [32:10] Why it was the relationships that changed Ray's
life [33:10] Ray's biggest weakness and how he overcame it [34:30] The jungle metaphor [36:00] The dot collector — deciding what to listen to [40:15] The wanting of meritocratic decision - making [41:40] How to see bubbles and busts [42:40] Productivity [43:00] Where we are in the cycle [43:40] What the Fed will
do [44:05] We are late in the long - term debt cycle [44:30] Long - term debt is going to be squeezing us [45:00] We have 2 economies [45:30] This year is very similar to 1937 [46:10] The top tenth of the top 1 % of wealth = bottom 90 % combined [46:25] How this creates populism [47:00] The economy for the bottom 60 % isn't growing [48:20] If you look at averages, the country is in a bind [49:10] What are the overarching principles that bind us together?
Without my
side hustle income, I really don't know what
life would be like.
That's the takeaway from everything we've ever heard from the governor and which was reinforced in Poloz's most recent analogy on the matter — comparing the rate cut to
life - saving surgery, and saying that you don't worry about possible
side effects at a time like that
Passing through the U.S. for a State -
side International
Living conference recently, I made a stop at a tailor shop to get some emergency repairs
done.
Providing sufficient evidence to both WRP and PC base that detest the other
side right now... that they have to
live with differences, to get together under one tent if they don't want to risk giving NDP Calgary again via vote splitting.
So instead, AC
did what they always
do in
live settings: noodle around on keyboards, make lots of yelping noises into echoe - y microphones and create extended instrumental soundscapes for the weird videos playing on the
side screens.
Adam J: As a former man, who now
lives as a woman, I really
do perceive both
sides of the coin, so to speak.
we used to
live side by
side in peace for thousands of years but things have changed and am sure its not my Quran because Quran
does nt change with what you guys
do.
Honestly that's a
side point though, the big question is where
did anything come from, not just
life specifically.
This is the thing: when you start to hit 28 or 30, everything starts to divide, and you can see very clearly two kinds of people: on one
side, people who have used their 20s to learn and grow, to find God and themselves and their deep dreams, people who know what works and what doesn't, who have pushed through to become real
live adults.
the problem with some Christian is they don't know god... even just by acknowledging God they'd be a step in the right direction... but then Jesus said many will come and say i saved
life on your name and God will respond «I
do no know you» your name is not in the book of
life those who are and have never separated from the
side of god and god's wisdom...
How sad to claim to be a chaplain and not be able to tell a dying patient anything about the specifics on the other
side of the veil; what will happen to a person who has died, what they will be
doing, what is the exact nature of God and those who depart from this
life.
Christians have voted to put their God's name on everyones money, add «Under God» to the flag salute, force schools to teach intelligent design with absolutely no scientific basis along
side the sciences, voted to write their moral laws on the fronts of public courthouses and tax funded buildings, voted to ban certain people from
living together, being intimate or raising children because their orientation didn't fit with their bible beliefs.
I think a lot of agnostic / atheist people would be perfectly content to
live their
lives without making their personal convictions a crusade if the other
side didn't make a crusade out of their religious beliefs.
I was groomed to focus on the negative
side of my
life, which lead me into deep
do»
do.
I had to make a choice to either cave in and just give up on
life, or to press in and overcome, and I chose — probably partly because of my personality, but a lot of it just being God in me — that I was determined I was going to make it through and come out on the other
side and
do something.
But the story I've
lived and the stories I know don't fit into «
Side A» or «
Side B,» and it is somewhat frustrating to feel as if our stories not real, recognized, or legitimate.
Naturally, all us have to make a
living and
do something on the
side to pay the rent and the leaders of the church are no different and usually come from the ranks of successful and talented business people who have a lot to contribute to the Kingdom of God.
Living this
side of Easter, we know what Mary and Martha could not know: that hearing and
doing are finally in the realm not of law, but of gospel — because the host of the banquet has himself become the main course.
Lutheran theology's antinomian tendency makes it perhaps more vulnerable than the other Reformation traditions in spite of the countervailing forces of its sociology and its doctrinal tradition, although here and there an older methodology, which understands that the Gospel
does not negate the commandments,
lives side by
side with neo-Lutheranism and makes possible at least a tentative no to the likes of the task force.
What is possible for us is to take seriously what is said by those who speak from the
side of oppressed groups, to
do what we can to make sure their voices are heard, and to try to adjust our own
living and thinking to make them more appropriate to what we have learned.
on the
side note,
did you know that pope
lives in Vatican which is smack in the Italy (that was the biggest chum of Nazis)?
It would have been good if someone had come along
side him and told him that he doesn't have to cut off his hand to escape hell and receive eternal
life, but only believe in Jesus.
If both
sides can agree on a common objective — to reduce the demand for abortions, maybe we can
do something to make a difference in people's
lives while we disagree over the larger issue.
When we find ourselves
living as peacemakers in the world, this kind of
living so easily leads to persecution because we all know the way the world works — it wants us to pick a
side, and it's not going to go down so well when we don't pick a
side and want to see everyone flourish.
When we reduce this complex and important conversation to two «
sides,» as though it were some kind of college football rivalry, we
do such an injustice to the Bible, to Christian history, and to the millions upon millions of real people whose
lives and whose futures we are discussing.
But even if we are thus reconciled in the «idea», this
does not mean that the actual separated Churches are united, those Churches which for 450 years have
lived side by
side, fighting and contradicting each other, or, worst of all, indifferent to one another.
And, too, they could be
doing this for
living people on the other
side of the world and if that
living person is not an active participant in it then it too is meaningless.
But on closer inspection we shall find that many heterogeneous elements
do, indeed, exist there
side by
side, but that the Churches are nevertheless extraordinarily «present» in public
life.
We might be impressed by a Judaism that
does not try to impose itself on others or by an Islam that has dominated the only societies in which the three Abrahamic faiths
lived peacefully
side by
side for centuries.
The discomfort with standing
side by
side with somebody who doesn't believe in Jesus is depressing to me, because how are we going to be a people on mission to the whole world if we can't march beside people and say, «Yeah, you should be able to able to
live and not be afraid of police, but only if you're a Christian.»
But if God truly
does have a violent and bloody
side then Jesus was being deceptive, for nowhere in His
life or ministry
did He reveal God as someone who goes to war against His enemies or commands the genocide of people who
do not love or obey Him.
For one
side, to warn people they should expect nothing of this world, because what is offered with the kingdom has nothing to
do with the present
life.
On the flip
side, if putting your faith in Christ doesn't equate to a happier
life, surely we're offering some pretty flaky «good news»?
Yet after achieving all off this 95 % certainty there are many cases that the statistics don't have the power to vet out
side effects that can impact the
lives of patients.
Marx made
life under capitalism seem much worse than it actually is, and he didn't spend a lot of time talking about the good
side of modern prosperity and freedom.
I would imagine both
sides could claim defense of their way of
life, both could say they only
do what they
do to defend themselves from the other and each will claim the other is the bad guy and the way the other fights is cowardly - they use bomber vests, we use unmanned drones - one willing to give their
lives the other not.
if you can lie to yourself with immunity, you might be an atheist if you think the indifferent support your
side, you might be an atheist if you don't think at all, you might be an atheist if you are drawn to religious discussions thinking someone wants to hear your opinion, you might be an atheist if you copy paste every piece of crap theory you find, you might be an atheist if you think you are right no matter what the evidence shows, you might be an atheist if you can't hold your water when you think about science, you might be an atheist if you can't write the word God, with proper capitalization, you might be an atheist if you think your view has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you think The View has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you
live in a tar paper shack, writing manifestos, you might be an atheist if you think you're basically a good person, and your own final authority you might be an atheist if you think your great aunt Tillie was a simian, you might be an atheist if you own an autographed copy of Origin Of The Species, you might be an atheist if you think that when you die you're worm food, you might be an atheist if you think the sun rises and sets for you alone, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is Charles Darwin when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is you when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if you attend a church but palm the offering plate when it passes, you might be an atheist If think this exhausts all the possibilities of definition, you might be an atheist.
Do you suppose that I've gone through all I have, and come out on the other side and starred a life of my own which every day I'm thankful for, just to take charge of you and see that you don't go to the dogs because you're so weak and full of self - pit
Do you suppose that I've gone through all I have, and come out on the other
side and starred a
life of my own which every day I'm thankful for, just to take charge of you and see that you don't go to the dogs because you're so weak and full of self - pity?
So stop
doing that and it will be possible again» (of course you can't repent while you're in the middle of
siding with Christ's enemies by taking refuge in the their tents — whether it be by going back to the Law for the Jews, or going back into a
life of sin.
God gives us the power to
live this godly
life (1 Peter 1:3)... but it
does take «every effort» from our
side to walk after Jesus (2 Peter 1:5 - 8) This
life is to have a clear conscience toward God.
To cite one instance among dozens, the Psalmist's desperate sense in his anguish — which in context seems to be over the decline in Israel's national fortunes — that God
does not appear to be
living up to His
side of the covenant is expressed as «Has His faithfulness vanished forever?»
It's not just
life / human nature / NATURE??? There are a lot of beautiful things in this world, but there is the uglier
side as well... and to blaim it all on God — good or bad... well you might as well be
living in the old testament... I am surprised there aren't still animal sacrifices to the angry, wrathful god that so many believe in... Oh, another question to the thumpers who believe that «God can be cruel» (And I really don't think Stephen King would say any of his work supports that)... So is God actually «perfect»?