Sentences with phrase «do on a personal basis»

So while they may assert disbelief in order to stave off coercive (in their view) actions by the government, many could take pride in doing what they can do on a personal basis.

Not exact matches

However, to cite my personal experience, I found that, as my company grew, it was harder to track down orders and checks on a consignment basis so today we do orders only.

What you can do: Encourage employees to tweet with their own personal voice rather than taking on a scripted tone — a strategy Peter Shankman, founder of the New York - based consulting firm Shankman / Honig and author of Nice Companies Finish First (Palgrave Macmillan, 2013) calls «shredding the scripts.»

While I didn't call it this at the time, I was launching my own personal brand and determining what I wanted out of a career based on what I was good at and what I liked doing.

She considers Nest Labs» Internet - connected thermostats as being a type of robot that can sense changes in its environment like rising temperature and then make adjustments based on a person's personal habits, even though those thermostats don't have arms or heads like people expect robots to have.

The figure is based on research about how workers at comparable positions at other companies are paid; it doesn't take into account the candidate's salary history or other personal factors.

They warned, several on the basis of personal experience, that participating in executions can exact a «severe toll on corrections officers» wellbeing» and that by doing so many so quickly Arkansas was «needlessly exacerbating the strain and stress placed on these officers».

I didn't have a personal brand before I started my blog and since then my entire business has been based on the trust established via blogging and podcasting, and to a lessor extent YouTube videos (I don't do as many).

Stefanie O'Connell (personal finance expert): «Unlimited 2 percent cash back on every purchase, a $ 500 sign - up bonus and simple cash back reward redemption make the Capital One Spark Cash for Business card an easy way to get rewarded for doing business on a daily basis.»

Robo - advisors use the same software as traditional advisors based on Modern Portfolio Theory, but usually only offer portfolio management and do not get involved in more personal aspects of wealth management, such as taxes and retirement or estate planning.

People often do it to determine how well they are doing in life and base their personal value on that.

Based on personal experience, I do believe that an author's «outside» promotional efforts — if planned and conducted prudently, applying sound marketing principles — can help to generate solid, ongoing sales.

Finally, I ran my investments through Personal Capital's Investment Checkup feature to see how I was doing and also analyze my current investment asset allocation compared to their recommendations based on my profile.

Shoving people into positions of power at Federal agencies that were created to protect the public interest based on little more than Trump's gut instinct that his picks will show him the requisite personal loyalty that he demands is undermining the Federal government's ability to do its job.

And if it does intervene, the government should use the opportunity to clean up banksterism once and for all and restore a sound banking system based on the principles of personal responsibility and laissez - faire.

However, what does matter to me is the extent to which a politician bases his public policy on his personal faith.

I think I'm too simple in my thinking that; if you don't like it, DO N'T WATCH... if you don't agree with it, DO N'T CHOOSE TO LIVE YOUR LIFE THAT WAY... Seems like a very simplistic way of thinking, but I have personal opinions on EVERYTHING, but I don't force others to live their lives according to my moral fiber... i don't judge people for living their lives the way that makes them happy... And i believe that IGNORANCE is the basis for INTOLERANCE... people are famous for HATING things that they don't understand... again, if it MORALLY offends you, don't read stories on things that you don't agree with, don't watch shows that portray choices that you don't agree with... The Brown family seems close knit, almost like extended family living under one roof... the kids work together and get along much better than a lot of «mainstream» households i see.DO N'T WATCH... if you don't agree with it, DO N'T CHOOSE TO LIVE YOUR LIFE THAT WAY... Seems like a very simplistic way of thinking, but I have personal opinions on EVERYTHING, but I don't force others to live their lives according to my moral fiber... i don't judge people for living their lives the way that makes them happy... And i believe that IGNORANCE is the basis for INTOLERANCE... people are famous for HATING things that they don't understand... again, if it MORALLY offends you, don't read stories on things that you don't agree with, don't watch shows that portray choices that you don't agree with... The Brown family seems close knit, almost like extended family living under one roof... the kids work together and get along much better than a lot of «mainstream» households i see.DO N'T CHOOSE TO LIVE YOUR LIFE THAT WAY... Seems like a very simplistic way of thinking, but I have personal opinions on EVERYTHING, but I don't force others to live their lives according to my moral fiber... i don't judge people for living their lives the way that makes them happy... And i believe that IGNORANCE is the basis for INTOLERANCE... people are famous for HATING things that they don't understand... again, if it MORALLY offends you, don't read stories on things that you don't agree with, don't watch shows that portray choices that you don't agree with... The Brown family seems close knit, almost like extended family living under one roof... the kids work together and get along much better than a lot of «mainstream» households i see...

One does not have to leave the pages of Brennan's review to see that, in practice, the suggested natural law jurisprudence would be indistinguishable from judging based on personal preferences.

What do you base your personal standards on?

kermit — Concerning the teacher analogy, if a teacher (or any other human) tells you something you don't automatically believe — you evaluate it, you run it through your own personal bs filter based on your current knowledge and experiences, etc..

Another AA tradition that you didn't mention is AA's 11th Tradition, which is «Our public relations policy is based on attraction rather than promotion; we need always maintain personal anonymity at the level of press, radio, and films.»

The scriptural witness of the prophecies should be enough as a basis for faith; Mary did not find the Lord through her quest for his body, but only through answering his personal call to her; she must not cling to his bodily presence, for his life is now on another plane, with the Father who is the Father of all those who follow Jesus because he is his Father who has raised him from the dead; Thomas is offered sight and touch, as a gracious concession to his lack of faith; but he does not believe because of this, but because the risen Lord addresses him; and the happiness of those who have faith without sight is greater.

What about right to privacy and you wanting to «restrict» someone based on personal opinions don't you get?

You may believe the Bible tells you gays should be able to marry or maybe even that blacks should not be able to marry whites (another thing people have used the Bible to protest against); however, that does not mean that US civil equal rights laws should be based on your personal religious beliefs.

If we can not acknowledge our personal failure with one partner, on what basis do we risk future encounters?

@david johson your long response offers no proof of anything, opinions and personal interpretation are not «proof «you admitted as much -LRB-, the old i can't prove a negative) but you impressed the heck out of martin t (not particularly difficult on that, as he appears to thrive on any bs that seems to support his «position») Just a side bar Santa does exist, or rather did, Saint Nicholas, Didn't know him personally and I don't think he was anything like the «Coke» version, but the persona is supposedly based on an actual persdid, Saint Nicholas, Didn't know him personally and I don't think he was anything like the «Coke» version, but the persona is supposedly based on an actual person.

, That Rylaarsdam's criticism is in part, at least, based on a misunderstanding of Buber's position and a difference in Rylaarsdam's own a priori assumptions is shown by his further statements that «Because of his individual and personal emphasis the notion of an objective revelation of God in nature and history involving the whole community of Israel in the real event of the Exodus does not fit well for him,» that Buber's view of revelation is «essentially mystical and nonhistorical,» and that «the realistic disclosure of Yahweh as the Lord of nature and of history recedes into the background because of an overconcern with the experience of personal relation» — criticisms which are all far wide of the mark, as is shown by the present chapter.)

Only occasionally does some piece of personal description raise our hopes that it may conceivably be based on a true reminiscence, e.g. that Justus Barsabas (cf. Acts 1:23) was flatfooted, and that Paul was «a man short of stature, thin - haired upon the head, crooked in the legs, well - built, with eyebrows joining, and nose somewhat hooked, full of grace» (Acts of Paul).

L Rivera is right, I guess mormons aren't christians... I just looked up the definition of a christian, and then the mormon beliefs, and they do match exactly... but... I also looked up L Rivera, and as it turns out, he is allowed to change definitions based on personal belief... turns out we're all wrong, and so is logic... damn... so many periods, and idiots

In medieval Europe, obligations were personal and traditional, based neither on common language nor on a single culture; they did not interpose the bureaucratic machinery of a state between the subject and the ruler.

In conversations with conservatives William Bennett and Milton Friedman, he prods them to recognize, as Rawls does, that much of what we call «achievement» is based at least as much on luck as on personal initiative.

Conservatives cherry - pick those passages that support their conservative view of God based on their conservative ego, and vice versa, where liberals are concerned... and there is NO way to ascertain which is true, except on a wholly subjective, personal level, thus it will never be proven objectively, since Spirit, by it's very nature, has absolutely nothing at all to do with the flesh and whatever seems to be happening on this earth, because Spirit is completely opposite, and therefore invisible to the naked human eye, being of the mind only, and therefore unprovable.

Lets evaluate the candidates based on what they can do for America, not what their personal religious beliefs are.

Yet if one knows that he is doing it and knows why he does it, the dangers of arbitrary choice based on wishful thinking or one's personal point of view may be somewhat eliminated.

There are levels in the Faith so please if you want to attack a person base on your personal feelings don't do it in the name of the Christianity because the holy Bible say, ««I am the Alpha and the Omega,» says the Lord God, «who is, and who was, and who is to come, the Almighty.»

You don't have to be Catholic it's a choice based on personal belief / faith.

They don't get to vote based on their personal biases, and there's no legal reason to uphold DOMA.

For some, tradition means «how we did it last year,» a tradition based all too frequently on the personal and idiosyncratic projections of worship leaders.

If you insist on pursuing a Barthian plurality of truth based on personal hermenutics, I would appreciate a practice of consistency by never challenging anyone else's truth because, as Barth say's, the bible does not become the word of God until you interpret it.

========= WORLD: However, the evaluation of the first and third definitions of «negated beliefs» in the statement... «Pantheists thus do not believe in a personal, anthropomorphic or creator god», seem to be incorrectly based on just western concepts.

These forms of consciousness will of course be different for every person, based on personal experience... so that is where a personal God comes in... one that fits each person's current level of understanding... a living, hopefully growing perception as knowledge increases, instead of a fixed idol or icon... but if it provides a person a non-harmful useful comfort and positive function, then what genius has the right to deprive them of that, with ridicule that their understanding is different and better, when the person being ridiculed at the time, does not possess the knowledge required to have the same understanding of the person ridiculing.

All you have to do, based on at least there being no actual evidence for any gods, is recognize / admit that the probability of there being any gods, especially a god that takes a personal interest in you and things going on here on Earth, is small.

I don't know that from personal experience but, based on the admirers you have, it seems you're greatly respected.

Yeah, it doesn't make a lot of sense considering that their entire religion is based on avoiding personal responsibility by letting Jesus take their punishment.

Actually, the problem with society is that people do think for themselves but based on each person's own / personal interests or perpsective.

My personal opinion, based on Jesus» own actions and words, is that he would want the church, or even for the non-believers — the communities themselves, to start charities or funds to help pay for their neighbors health care costs — I don't believe he would have advocated for the government to mandate it.

Secular organizations do have much to learn from men like Rivers and Madison about how personal, intense interaction based on core beliefs changes lives, especially the lives of at - risk children.

Likewise, although the ancients thought of friendship as a personal bond based on the mutual attractiveness of certain qualities, they did not emphasize individual or idiosyncratic traits as this basis.

Christians do practice personal teshuvah on a weekly basis but have a weak sense of corporate responsibility.

A belief is something you have come to based on an active search where you you gather evidence and then make a hypothesis changing your view from one of neutral to positive «I believe in gravity after having studied the research that has been done and my personal experience with things falling on my head» which is different than «I disbelieve Leprechauns because there is no evidence one way or the other as to their existence.»