Sentences with phrase «do other data sources»

It gives lenders a broader view of your credit history than do other data sources, such as a bank's own customer data.

Not exact matches

The fact that this topic is popular on here may serve you well if this was expanded a bit more (which you just did with the couples angle, but perhaps looking at other data sources to help quantify what people's net worth is... and perhaps with respect to geography / cost of living... also how to maximize your relative net worth by moving to a low cost area — which I plan to do (abroad)!.

However, MPF and most other apps use crowd sourcing to collect data (an example would be this meal where they likely didn't have fibre listed).

Research that's been done for white papers or books can be exported for online use, and the researchers behind it are often experienced in pulling and combining data from the government and other freely available sources.

Goddard's computer models, with input from ocean buoys, atmospheric models, satellite data and other sources, can also simulate what ocean water temperatures could do in the coming months.

«Local media is the bedrock of internet surveillance — the kind of work that we do in terms of scouring the web looking for early signs of something taking place in a community,» explained Brownstein, chief innovation officer at Boston Children's and a pioneer in the field of using sources other than public health data to do this type of work.

Am I correct in assuming that Mann and all the other recent attempts at reconstructing recent climate did not use new data, rather they used already published data from many sources?

We do this by accumulating user feedback and the statistical data received from various other sources.

Now, the Toolbar is not the only source of data anymore, although Alexa doesn't elaborate on what exactly these other sources are.

In my book, The Collapse of Parenting, I share data from many sources — including the National Institutes of Health, international databases such as the PISA program, scholarly papers by researchers such as Professor Jean Twenge, and many other sources — showing that American kids are indeed more likely to be obese, less likely to be physically fit, more likely to be anxious and depressed, compared with American kids 30 years ago — and in the case of academic achievement, doing much less well compared with kids in other countries, again a big change compared with American kids 30 years ago.

After denouncing the «best practices» identified by the authors of Surpassing Shanghai on the basis of the methods we used, Greene appears to realize that his war on «best practices» has led him to inadvertently attack the kinds of studies done by people whose policy prescriptions he prefers, like Ludger Woessmann and Eric Hanushek, who have done well - regarded statistical analyses of survey data from OECD - PISA and other sources.

Based on a detailed survey and other data sources, we conclude that two - thirds of state K - 12 student assessment systems do not reach even the middle level of system quality.

No verification is done regarding the accuracy of the data values in the source file other than what is provided by the Delphi accounting system.

No verification is done regarding the accuracy of the PII data values in the source file other than what is provided by the Delphi accounting system.

There are no other sources of real - world data available to NHTSA that discriminate between crashes involving heavy vehicles equipped with stability control systems and those that do not.

Upon looking at that data, I realized that some sources were weighted more heavily than others, since each source didn't share the same value system.

After all, the NYT bestseller list is based (so they tell us) on anonymous and supposedly widely sourced data from a lot of bookstores, and wholesales who retail to other outlets... And has: 1) reputedly been cooked before 2) As we don't know the methodology is hard to check — but we know some very popular books never make it, and books which don't sell that many copies (17K hardback was reputed to get you onto the extend list, according to a friend who got there on that) 3) We know Bookscan data is pretty close to GIGO — so it's hard to see where the NYT would get better data.

Because Enova already looks at a lot of data in credit reports beyond the standard credit scores, as well as alternative sources of data, DeCosmo said he doesn't think the change will affect Enova's business as much as some other businesses that are more reliant on third - party - produced scoring.

The best way to do this is to «show our work» when it comes to scientific research and statistical data, making sure that we promote the most recent findings from academic sources such as those supported by HABRI and others.

If I am foolish enough not to look at other relevant data that would affect the outcome of my assertion, then that is what I am, a fool, though Fred Singer would simply smile and say, no, «the world is flat»; «smoking is not bad for your health»; CFC's do not harm the ozone... you need to check the source and the history behind the source to get more perspective.

On the other hand, you do want to know if some single dataset is dominating the conclusion (because the whole point of pooling a lot of data sources is to avoid that), so scientists will frequently engage in sensitivity analysis, deleting one dataset or another, and checking to see whether the conclusion is altered meaningfully.

The discrepancies between NASA and other data sources can't help but make us consider Einstein's advice: «If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.»

Do I trust all climate scientists, research institutions, funding sources, journals and others involved in this arena to convey the full context of findings and to avoid sometimes stepping beyond the data?

The vast majority opinion was that scientists should give enough information on their data sources and methods so others who are scientifically capable can do their own brand of replication work, but that this does not extend to personal computer codes with all their undocumented sub routines etc..

«And deliberately modifying your source data (obtained from others) without describing what you did and why you did it»

«NOAA and other data authorities do not release the source code or raw data to show how they come up with these adjustment»

And deliberately modifying your source data (obtained from others) without describing what you did and why you did it is normally called fraud.

Am I correct in assuming that Mann and all the other recent attempts at reconstructing recent climate did not use new data, rather they used already published data from many sources?

Regardless of what references can be given to other sources, the data is right there now and does indeed show a statistically significant warming trend over that period.

How does this compare with other data sources?

Don't believe anything you read; Question everything; Be especially suspicious of numbers; Know the source and political bias; If you're affected by the story get at least three other sources; Remember all government information and data is biased; Be especially wary of stories that cite authorities.

Sometimes, the results that do not fit are discarded, because they are not considered representative, because they do not follow other data collection standards, because they provide from other sources, etc..

But obviously this is not the case as you can clearly see based on the fact that greenhouse emissions from other sources are many orders of magnitudes higher than from PV, even if you take old data and produce PV in large number on old inefficient equipment and do ignore the simple fact that PV electricity production replaces fossil fuel based electricity production!

Tilo — I've not read the temp reconstruction methodologies in detail but do they really correct «data» from other sources based on other «data» vaguely nearby??

The Advocate General noted that the character of this data as personal data is not affected by the fact that the search engine does not distinguish between personal data and other data and that there may be «no technical or operational difference» between source web pages containing personal data and those not containing such data.

According to Stern, the rating does not take into consideration other factors or third - party data sources.

Some people see that as a positive, especially because it's a way for them to take control in an era when insurance credit scoring is ubiquitous and you don't have much choice as to any of the other data sources, either.

You agree not to do any of the following: (A) post or transmit any libelous, defamatory, indecent, obscene, fraudulent, deceptive, abusive or pornographic message, data, image, content or program; (B) post or transmit any message, data, image, content or program that would violate any property rights of others; (C) use the Services to threaten, harass, or otherwise violate the legal rights (including rights of privacy and publicity) of others; (D) upload or download files that contain software, marks, logos, data, images, content or other material protected by intellectual property laws, rights of privacy or publicity, or any other applicable law, unless you own or control the rights to such files or material or have received all necessary consents; (E) upload files that contain a virus or corrupted data; (F) falsify the source or origin of software or other material contained in a file that you upload to the Services; (G) falsely purport to be an employee or agent of Gigaom; (H) act, in your use of the Services, in a manner that is contrary to applicable law or regulation; or (I) circumvent, disable or otherwise interfere with security - related features of the Services or features that prevent or restrict use or copying of any Content or enforce limitations on use of the Services or the Content.

Facebook collects data from two sources: first - party data (things you do on facebook.com) and third - party data (including data collected overly or covertly via the «Like» button on other websites, «Login with Facebook,» Facebook Messenger chat widgets, and the Atlas advertising network that Facebook owns).

The endless streams of data generated by applications lends its name to this paradigm, but also brings some hard to deal with requirements to the table: How do you deal with querying semantics and implementation when your data is not finite, what kind of processing can you do on such data, and how do you combine it with data from other sources or feed it to your machine learning pipelines, and do this at production scale?

When Google Assistant doesn't immediately have that information at its virtual fingertips, it can pull down data from other sources, such as Wikipedia, and it will tell you exactly where it's getting the information from.

The change from Facebook eliminates one potential data leak source and does improve privacy on some level, but many are saying it and other measures should have been put in place a long time ago.

Backups don't include data that's easily available from other sources, such as your emails, which are stored on provider servers.

According to the app's description it pulls data from openweathermap.org, but there doesn't appear to be any customization in this particular area, so there is no means to have the app grab weather from others sources that may be more preferable to you, at least for now.

Other national sources of data don't depict similar decreases.

Years ago when I started writing for REM, I predicted that those who didn't get into technology would be left behind, wondering what happened to their business model of using mailers and other like marketing materials to source out new clients to add to their data base.

Once again, realtors and other «free» sources do not have the critical pre-foreclosure data, where you're wanting to do mailings to delinquent homeowners who have received a NOD that is part of the public record, for the purpose of contacting them about buying or wholesaling (straight or short sale) their home.

Just as with other crime data, Lee says it's better to be «the source of the source» — directing buyers to online resources so they can do their own research.