Not exact matches
«As for the coverage, he doesn't get involved
in it at all — not what stories to
do or what not to
do; he doesn't
comment on any stories, including about Amazon, he just doesn't,» Marty Baron, executive editor of the Washington
Post, said Thursday at an annual dinner for Columbia University's Knight - Bagehot journalism fellowship.
The company
did not add a
comment to the
comments made
in the support page
posting.
Facebook
did not provide further
comment on the report
in The Washington
Post or on Drobota's role with Expunere, noting that the company was closed Friday and that people were on vacation.
Abadie, who
posted the ticket itself on Google +, claimed
in the
comments on her Google + page that Glass wasn't on at the time (though,
in a spirit of subtle honestly, she said she «doesn't use it much while driving»).
In his first public
comments since the events, Cohn told the Financial Times that the administration of President Donald Trump «must
do better» to condemn hate groups and indicated that he'd considered resigning from his
post due to the Charlottesville fallout.
Heather Hopkins, a senior market analyst for Hitwise, explained
in a blog
post why she chose to focus on loyalty: «A few weeks ago when I
posted my blog entry about Facebook being the largest news reader, I received a few
comments and e-mails noting that visitors aren't as valuable if they don't come back.
its president told National
Post in a statement (The union
did not respond to a request for further
comment from Canadian Business).
The first thing i
did on reading your
post heading
in the mail is going back to the old
post i left that
comment and my happiness got doubled reading your reply about this
post...
It pulled the
posting in the afternoon, saying it was a mistake, and
did not answer calls requesting
comment.
In those comments, which were posted by the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Mr. Zuckerberg reiterated how Facebook needed to do better in data privacy and other matter
In those
comments, which were
posted by the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Mr. Zuckerberg reiterated how Facebook needed to
do better
in data privacy and other matter
in data privacy and other matters.
Fake follower counts are based on Points North scanning followers of influencers to sort out such things as accounts making
comments in languages that don't make sense for the content or the influencer, or accounts making the exact same
comments across multiple influencers and
posts.
This
post is
in response to the following excellent
comment from Stephen Moore, the man who will trounce Ralph Goodale
in the next federal election (or at least
do better than I
did): April 2007 testimony before the parliamentary committee on International Trade saw Industry Canada, DFAIT reps and others stress the importance of the -LSB-...]
I also suggested that if you are part of a team blog such as Savvy one of the things we
did in the early days was to
comment on each others
posts.
Mark Zuckerberg responded with his own
comment on Koum's
post saying he was «grateful for everything you've
done to help connect the world, and for everything you've taught me, including about encryption and its ability to take power from centralized systems and put it back
in people's hands.
we
do not
post giveaways
in the
comments of our tweets!
Set forth below is the text of a
comment that I recently
posted to the discussion thread for another blog entry at this site: «But there has also never
in the history of the market been a time when we went to a P / E10 level
in the 30s and
did not see a price crash of 50 percent to 65 percent» And there have never been two such crashes less than 80 years apart.
Please let me know what you think
in the
comments below, and don't forget to share the
post, if you liked it!
When Kyle Kashuv, one of the more prominent figures
in the ongoing debate about what to
do to reduce high school mass shootings, went to a shooting range with his father last Friday, the first thing he
did was
post some pictures and some pro-Second Amendment
comments on Twitter.
Having all the
comments in one single place makes it more efficient as we don't have to jump from
post to
post.
(I don't measure the interest of people
in any
post by the number of
comments because I hear from people who tell me they like the site but don't express their opinions.
I can't believe some of the
comments people have
posted on these blogs recently, but unfortunately I have to believe that they
did,
in fact,
post them, for example
you already
posted this
comment like 4 pages back and no one cared then and no one will now plus atheists
do nt believe
in satan its evident you
do nt know that satanists are atheists and what is statan?
@Daniel & @Heather: Please don't miss my
comments and questions
in one of the earlier
posts.
You don't have to explain.I only threw
in my two cents because this is a forum where
comments are welcome and because people responded to my initial
post.
Does this «Hitler was an atheist,» boondoggle have to be rebut - ted
in every single
comments section of every single article
posted on this blog?
Am I allowed to
do that here and
post comments in an effort to both seek the truth for myself and if possible spread the truth?
The fact that you just
posted a
comment on the internet is all the proof you need to know that science
does,
in fact, work.
Hey — A dose of Reality — You
posted to my
comment that you
DID live
in a one bedroom flat.
You seem like a good person, and seem to
do a much better job of conducting yourself as a Christian should than many Christians who
post online, but I see no signs
in your
comment of independent thought.
In the end, needing 20 passwords and phrases to
post a
comment, often to atheists that don't want to know God anyway.
I could relate to every single thing you've mentioned
in your
post as well as those who've
commented but just don't find the courage to take the next step.
TheLies»
comment above about your
post as usual conveniently ignores the critical point that crimes
done by Stalin et al were not
done under any guidance of atheism, whereas the guidance to
do the many atrocities that Christians have
done can be found
in the many horrific instructions «from god» presented
in the Christian book of nasty AKA the bible.
But I
do try, to the best of my ability, to write my
posts with love and grace, and to respond to
comments — even the negatives ones —
in the same way.
Did that many times and
posted the results here many times but
in case you forgot or skipped the
comments:
Great
post, and the really disproportionate thing about it is this is all
done using the «law» demanding the tithe when not one New Testament book endorses this model (The reference
in Hebrews was not to establish tithe as it was to establish Jesus
in a different order, and his
comments in the gospels was to people living under the law)... how is it that no other «law» is preached with the same force and conviction as tithing?
Do you think that,
in criticizing certain expressions of the modern evangelical movement for being political / anti-intellectual, some of us have simply become (as Mike said
in a
comment at the end of my
post) «total snobs»?
The
comments on this
post are an indication to me that voices have been silenced, which builds up enormous pressure
in the silenced, and once they find a venue where they can speak their minds, they
do.
I had noticed that a couple of people had
commented earlier regarding the OP, so that's what I
did, as well as
posting something personal having to
do with the change of topic to participate
in the conversation and, hopefully, help with the healing going on here
in some way.
In my opinion, much could have been cleared up five years ago when these issues came up, as
did pressure to various bloggers to edit or pull down
posts and
comments.
I also
did for some reason around that time write a blogpost about marriage
in reaction to something T had written, just theoretically because I didn't know anything about the backstory until I read Bills
post and some
comment elsewhere on a blog that I can't remember.
I made a
comment about what you might
do in a * hypothetical * situation related to an article that * you *
posted and now don't seem to understand.
I am reading your newest
posts to your oldest.I have never been to bible school but I consider myself
in the journey of education concerning the bible.more than any opinions that you have what concerns me most is how «brothers and sisters» through their
comments responds to someone who thinks differently from what is perceived as absolutes (not sure if that's the right term)
in scripture.I wonder
did the apostle believe half the things that are seen as church doctirine today?how
did the disciples who
did not have the new testament or the ability to read follow Jesus?I appreciate your questioning.
In my experience we are too quick to try and fix someone or use the scriptures as a control mechanism and to slow to practise empathy and love..
you need to read the
posts in context... youre wayout of line with that
comment cause it had nothing to
do with the topic
That single story has already been so exaggerated and exploited by folks on both sides I'd rather not take the space
in the
post to address it, but may
do so
in a
comment or separate
post.)
The
comments following Kim Van Brunt's guest
post on Saturday really
did a number on me, so, despite the fact that they weren't even directed at me or my family, I spent a good part of Saturday night curled up
in my pouting chair (yes, I have one, don't you?)
Since morality, or beliefs, religious or otherwise, strike me as the key driving force (after all, I'm even
posting this
comment in CNN's «Belief Blog»)
in an anti-choice individuals logical reasoning for thinking the way they
do, I would like to know exactly how making abortion illegal will help you sleep at night, or register as a moral victory.
Confession: I've lingered around this board and
posted several
comments throughout the day, but only just now
did I read the original article
in its entirety.
I am the owner of this blog (though I
did not write this
post), and appreciate the perspective you provide
in this
comment, and the others
in this thread.
Do not publish entire
posts of yours
in the
comment section of other blogs.
Do read the whole post, and don't miss the substantial discussion in the comment sectio
Do read the whole
post, and don't miss the substantial discussion
in the
comment section.