«Prior to opening the question
we do the practice questions, and still they have to fit those sorts of questions in on top of their schoolwork, so it's quite a challenging event in terms of managing their timeline.
You probably already
did some practice questions, but take the time to review the points you really want to hit in the interview.
Not exact matches
Unfortunately Mr. Bruening
does not provide any empirical evidence on his three proposals, so whether or not they are valid in
practice is an open
question.
This all begs the
question:
Do you
practice what you preach?
Sources told Page Six that celebrities have been
practicing answers to the inevitable barrage of
questions involving alleged abusers Harvey Weinstein and Woody Allen, and publicists have been working overtime to make sure their clients «don't step in a pile of s — t» during interviews, as one Los Angeles publicist with Oscar - nominated clients said.
The
question is, in
practice, how
do you make it happen.»
Second, although the Auditor General concludes that the Department of Finance's fiscal sustainability analyses are based on sound
practices, he
questions why they are not
done for all major initiatives or on a timely basis.
The hearings didn't reveal new information about Facebook's
practices, but they suggested that many members of Congress are ready to move on from the status quo of weak privacy protections and unfettered data collection by companies in the U.S. Below, we break down some of the top hits, misses, and unanswered
questions from the hearings.
Cambridge Analytica, a political consulting firm that
did digital work for Donald Trump's presidential campaign in 2016, is reportedly shutting down after recent ethical and legal
questions about its business
practices.
The Yale Law School graduate is seen as showing genuine concern about others at the company, which raises the
question: Why
did he stay at a company that has come under fire for its questionable and sometimes illegal
practices?
Having learned of all of these benefits to
practicing gratitude, your next
question is probably «How
do I
do it?»
The problem I'm having is that when you use the word «
practicing» you are implying people are «
doing» something which is most likely something many church people were taught to condemn without
question.
The ordained leaders of the Church, and the laity who are Christ's principal witnesses in the public square,
do not enter public life proclaiming, «The Church teaches...» When the
question at issue is an immoral
practice, they enter the debate saying, «This is wicked; it can not be sanctioned by the law and here is why, as any reasonable person will grasp.»
People have the right to leave church and organized religion, they have a right to
question an institution that will
do anything to save face even if it means letting children be harmed (and trust me, there are Priests that have issues with girls - my mom when to an all girls» Catholic school in the 60s and talks about how many of the priests used to «hang out» with the young girls out and girls have been abused), churches that are not
practicing social justice.
I see no difference between «plural marriage» and any other nutty religious
practice... but I
do have ONE
question for the Mormons about the topic:
do I need any approval before I
practice my religion,
do I have to prove my religion before I
practice, my holy book further describe that you must carry a gun in 21st century because there is too much crime in this world, but it doesn't say much about if I migrate to another country these rules will still apply, Or I should modified them according to my comfort, like talking in English which is not my religious language wearing pants or not, having education or not, standing in line or not, I am so confused what should I
do can someone help me, should I go back to country where my religion originated or back in time ask my guru
questions about western world confusion, or just decide by myself what suites me, or preach other develop country that you guys are wrong be peaceful.
The
question I would have to ask is it within their worship
practices to acknowledge their god for various acts or
do they only pray 3 times a day.
I'm disappointed that in his letter, His Eminence doesn't develop his answer to the
question of how to put mercy into
practice a bit more fully.
But what I said was that those who choose to sin again and again without thought of the consequences (again I don't know a
practicing Christian who
does, but I think most self identified Christians fall under that category) give me reason to
question their salvation.
Not only
does the pluralism in
question characterize past and present construals of the Christian thing and their respective social and cultural locations; it also characterizes particular theological schools, the
practices that constitute them, and their respective social and cultural locations.
If we think of «theory» as the forming of generalizations or synoptic judgments and think of «
practice» as requiring judgments about particular cases, then inquiry guided by these three types of
questions will always require capacities for
doing both.
The proposal that the unifying interest governing theological schooling factors into three types of
questions does not subtly reintroduce into the discussion of theological schools the stultifying «theory /
practice» divide.
The presence of such policy - oriented commentary raises an interesting
question: How
do we get from highly general biblical principles to specific policies and
practices?
If you
do find a passage that seems to support the church
practice in
question, you need to
do some serious Bible study to make sure it really says what you think it says, and you're not just using it as a proof text.
Orwin goes on to say that Liberal Democracy doesn't work like that in
practice because it actually assumes a particular conception of the good: «For so long as you observe prevailing liberal democratic norms on all fundamental social
questions, you're free in merely secondary matters to continue in the ways of your ancestors.»
Another
question has to
do with a
practice that those in the «Catholic» churches of Christendom have found so valuable: praying for the departed.
If you see anything that doesn't jibe with standard air force
practice, please
question it.»
While Enlightenment ideas about freedom led rationalists to
question the traditional religious strictures against euthanasia and suicide, the Christian opposition to these
practices did not weaken.
But recently, I have undertaken the
practice of
questioning absolutely everything the church
does in light of Scripture and effectiveness.
I think that the
question we are raising — how
do Christian
practices add up to a way of life?
As the missionary partner, Christianity will change in some ways, whether the other
does or not: it will have to address new
questions and configurations of thought, and weigh liturgical and cultural
practices to be adopted, adapted or rejected.
I find nothing to object to the ideal of complete explanation, even though it is unrealizable in
practice, but I
do question this exclusive attention to efficient causation.
But these
do suffice to bring under
question the venerable
practice of preaching from isolated texts, or even brief pericopes.
Maybe this is overstating the case, but it really
does seem that in most churches, you can
question and challenge almost anything, except the
practices of baptism and communion.
And one of the most poignant differences I noticed was in the culture of testimonies as it was
practiced in these churches: Several conversations opened with the
question, «So, how
did you come to Christ?»
If I had visited you and tried to help you with your physical needs while battling cancer, and you found out, after 3 months of me helping you, I was a pastor [I am], and then you asked me the
question,
do you think
practicing gays will go to hell unless repenting and following Jesus, and I told you, «Yes,» what would you
do?
We
do this to understand the impact that television is having upon our worship
practices and take on the larger
question of how we are to interpret our faith in our «electronic» cultural milieu.
Thus, a
question like, «Why
does Tony Jones of the Christian Emerging Movement apparently
practice legal warfare on his ex-spouse?»
Post-colonial Reflections by Jacob Dharmaraj (1993) raises the
question whether a good part of the missionary idea and
practice in India was not controlled by the colonial climate of thought which
did not belong to the essence of the gospel.
Prayer is not basically a problem to be solved or a
question to be answered; it is something to be
done — older writers spoke of the «
practice of prayer.»
But actually requiring a dialogue,
question and answer, interactive discussion about a text of Scripture, which then leads to brainstorming about how everybody can go out and put it into
practice in tangible ways, and then actually going out and
doing it, requires too much for most people.
Throughout the study the team keeps in mind the underlying
question: What
do members demonstrate is the preferable and reliable
practice of their household?
question: Why
did the pastor have to go to seminary to get his training to use his gift when we don't send others to seminary to get training to
practice their gifts?
Influenced by Luther's writings, he stressed the authority of the Bible and
questioned any doctrine or
practice that
did not have scriptural support.
The
question then becomes: To what extent
does the missionary push orthodox boundaries (in doctrine and
practice) to present the gospel to a people group?
Once we see that non-violence has difficulty responding to these sorts of hypothetical
questions, we then decide that non-violence is impractical for life in general, and don't even try to
practice it.
The human polytheists, in
practice, have a great deal in common with the Abrahamic monotheists of Planet Earth: They're a people of the book, divided between fundamentalists who take the sacred scrolls literally and more latitudinarian believers who don't, and divided, as well, on all the culture - war
questions — notably abortion — that divide our own semi-Christian West.
There's some
question as to how good of a
practice this is, given that this method doesn't actually lower someone's core body temperature, but it at least helps them feel a little better.
The
question is,
do you spend enough time
practicing at the same intensity level that you use in a game?
Regardless of the veracity of the «gangster» allegation,
questions remain about the Lightning's tangled finances, about Kokusai Green's business
practices and about whether the NHL sooner or later will feel compelled to
do something about the Tampa Bay ownership — or will just keep praying that the Lightning will get sold and the problem will go away.