Even rocket scientists don't
do rocket science all day.
Not exact matches
No
rocket science, no magic tricks — it's just simply
doing what's fair.
That doesn't seem like
rocket science to me.
This isn't exactly
rocket science: making sure that your newest employee can
do their job sounds about as basic a business rule as you can imagine.
Some of Cross's clients use sophisticated simulation modeling to predict sales at different price levels, but his technique doesn't have to be
rocket science.
Did they make their topic sound like
rocket science?
The good news is it isn't
rocket science, but if you don't
do certain things and
do them right, you'll never get your startup off the ground.
Building a successful flexible workforce doesn't have to be
rocket science.
However, understanding your business credit score doesn't require a degree in
rocket science (or even accounting for that matter).
Getting out of debt isn't
rocket science, but it
does require an in - depth knowledge of your own finances.
It is not
rocket science to believe that many (most) Jews of the present have very little in the way of ancestry to
do with the original indigenous Israelite of the Middle East.
First, to the topic at hand: This isn't
rocket science, the OP made clear cause and effect statements as to why Chrisitans believe what they
do.
Do you really need to ask this???? It's not
rocket science.
Isn't that like someone who doesn't understand
rocket science assuming that
rockets fly by magic, or people ignorant of modern medicine believing that illnesses come from demonic possession rather than germs?
It's not
rocket science to
do simplistic multiplication or is it?
Making your own high - protein snacks doesn't have to be
rocket science.
Broiling any fish isn't
rocket science, and most people know how to
do this.
This is not a new question, and I don't believe the answer is
rocket science.
Making great wines is not
rocket science, but you need to
do the right things at the right time and one of the most important decisions that you can make during harvest is the correct picking time.
1 Off the top, it
does not take
rocket science to know that united 4 man midfield will overrun us in a 4 -2-4 formation by playing 2 midfielders against there 4 and also considering Ramsey's poor passing ability.
i never said that i'm the brightest out there, its just annoying that people write conspiracy theories / guesses and finish it with «not
rocket sciences lad» implying that you are SURELY right, as only you are able to discern the truth from the lie,
do nt be so full of yourself, this theory of yours is just an opinion not the truth, it could be but probably far away from it
There's enough quality up front to
do that and it's no
rocket science.
Your comments are very naive and idiotic.Even if he had a limited budget at that time it's not as if every player would cost him a fortune.Also it's not about the limited budget that makes him support his players to perform.It's his philiosophy.Even till this day he tends to support and persist with his players to bring out the best in them.If you think I don't know what am saying wait till they get fit.On Giroud if we are to be honest he should have been dropped long ago even in his second season.It was never
rocket science to know that the guy ws not starter quality.Tell me which team would have persisted with Giroud as a starter more than Arsenal.He failed long ago and was really really benched like just last season.As for Szcz Wenger also
did persist with him during the times he still wasn't performing.I hope people won't deny this.He persisted till he could take no more of it.That was the reason why he brought Ospina into the starting 11.
I still don't understand people's obsession with boxing players in to a specific role... The whole «true DM» is a dying breed, even Coquelin is arguably something else considering the advanced positions he takes up often in front of Santi and takes major risks in winning the ball back for us... IMO, the reason Coquelin has had such a successful integration into the first team is that he focussed incredibly hard on the basics of his role first and foremost before adding other elements to his game (long - balls, driving runs into space, more aggressive ball movement in general) it's not
rocket science to tell a player to curb the attacking side of their game and focus primarily on defence before attack... Nor is it that hard to see that playing in a midfield pairing with either Ramsey or Cazorla is going to be different as well.
I guess you are gonno be very comfortable giving excuses for monsieur wenger for the next decade just as you have been
doing for the past decade, the fact that we needed a DM and a centre forward in d past summer is not
rocket science or based on your rickety analysis
It's not
rocket science what we must
do is sign a quality cf.. He
does not have to be world class but he has to be better than giroud.
But sometimes when he looks like he is not in the match he can be just deadly, you don't expect him and «then he suddenly moves» and scores... you don't need
rocket science to understand that...
Just park the bus, and flood the midfield, thats what chelski will
do, its not
rocket science, counter attack is the name of the game, Costa will crucify Mertsacker if we leave him exposed!
Look let's face it these fringe players won't leave because they are on good money and they don't want a drop in wages so they are happy to sit on the bench week in week out Wenger wants to get real if you want rid of them drop the bloody price it's not
rocket science
I don't need a crystal ball to acknowledge the fact that a BELLERIN is a gem who has the potential to be world class compared to a jekinson and it's not
rocket science to denote british young lads are bothering on poor quality human resources.
It's not
rocket science, these are basic theories / opinions which many think would make us great, but the obstinate one will not
do what other want him to because he is obsessed with proving sensible voices wrong by playing decent (but not great) players and playing in a stylish fluid manner, which other teams have worked out and which makes us largely one dimensional.
It ai nt
rocket science to realise he would be missed is it.Lets just hope he
does nt pick up a long term injury for us.We would srruggle without him for sure
We knew what we had to
do - it's not really
rocket science - playing at home against a team we were expected to beat.
We're not talking about
rocket science here, so don't worry.
Along with volcanos, magic milk, and a lava lamp, film canister
rockets are a must
do science experiment for kids of all ages.
We've
done a few
science posts on
science sparks, like this
rocket, which he loved.
Along with volcanos, magic milk, and a lava lamp, film canister
rockets are a must
do science experiment for kids
If you
do nothing else today, you MUST watch the Mitchell and Webb Youtube entitled «Brain Surgery vs
Rocket Science»!
You don't need any
rocket science to assemble the joovy walker, just take it out of the box and use it, only the seat needs to be attached.
It's a good skill to have and it just goes to show that cleaning doesn't require a degree in
rocket science.
2 growing bags (ideal if you don't have a garden) 2
Rocket seed potatoes 3 piccolo star seed potatoes 1 sheet of variety labels for grow bag identification Diary stickers 1 healthy eating poster «Beneath the soil»
science activity
You don't need
rocket science to figure out how to make it work.
Its not
rocket science but the Fabian Society conveniently fail to
do the tiniest bit of thinking as it has the potential to drive people off benefits and into work, something the Labour movement doesn't want as it likes to maintain a client state.
This is not
rocket science — it was removed precisely BECAUSE
doing so «basically created a whole new class of special interest money...» Duh.
This isn't
rocket science, but apparently it's not something that a career politician knows how to
do.»
According to him, «I wrote an article not too long ago, you have made us proud, you have shown us that governance is not
rocket science, you make it look so simple and people wonder how you
do it.
Raising a child, it turns out, is neither brain surgery nor
rocket science but something that biology, shaped by evolution, equips us to
do.
It doesn't take
rocket science — or religion, Harris astringently opines — to conclude that such «cultural values» decrease the well - being of the women so affected and thus are morally wrong.
None of this is
rocket science — which makes Nash all the more frustrated that so little is being
done.
By flying such newly - developed instruments on a relatively inexpensive sounding
rocket, scientists
do more than just gather solid
science data.