Sentences with phrase «do see that perspective»

Not exact matches

I related to the book in ways that I was not expecting and it did what only truly great books do — it made me think about things that I wouldn't have otherwise, and it made me see the world from a slightly different perspective.

But what is so bizarre is that they differ so vastly, and they don't all apply to each publisher, yet the world's biggest names in publishing all saw a major blip that in some cases will have been rather concerning from an ad revenue perspective.

And on the US side, those tariffs were not placed on consumer goods, which would have a more material impact and from a market perspective, we do see quite a lot priced in, in terms of our downside scenario, as it relates to trade.

He's also seen the numbers and concedes that supply really does appear to be keeping up with demand — at least from a statistical perspective — but he cautions there still could be problems.

I get to see the sport from different perspective and that helps me do a better job at every level.

There's also a third route: think of an idea that is rooted in a perspective that everyone else is missing because they don't see the potential today.

The smartphone company didn't elaborate on the specifics of the new VR exhibit, only to say that museum visitors will be able to see a «fresh perspective into Modigliani's life and influences» and parts of Paris that inspired the contemporary of Pablo Picasso and Juan Gris.

«From our perspective, we feel that if we're more competitive and we're giving customers a better offer whether that's in terms of quality, range or price then we would see to do better than that,» he said.

It's got explanations built into it, there's materials, there's offers to do calls... It really was a groundbreaking thing to just see it from an outside perspective.»

Even if we don't see outsized price increases in commodities, from a total return perspective, commodity returns will benefit from a change to positive roll yields based on the reshaping and structuring of the fundamental market in commodities.

I think most of their customers are people who have been disenfranchised for a long time by traditional wealth managers who charge much more and do much less, and from their perspective, I can see why going with PC would be a great decision.

It may not be a real game changer for the economy overall or where we are in the business cycle, but if we did see something happen, especially something like lower corporate taxes, it would be a more positive outlook for earnings and something positive for investors from a sentiment perspective to hang their hats on.

From your expert perspective do you think most companies see the longterm vision (and investment needed; cash and otherwise) or they are just riding the wave of, «this is the thing to do right now?»

Let's do a side by side from a Mutual fund perspective and see which one you get through.

The problem for the religious is this: you give to a child a TRUE understanding of the natural world, and impart them with a TRULY scientific perspective, and they WILL see that god almost certainly does not exist, and that religion is a fairy tale.

You say you will never see if you don't take your hands off your eyes and yet refuse to look at the world from any other perspective than your own Hebrew God derived universe and you will make or accept any excuse that allows you to keep believing you are right.

You see, as a former christian, I do not have a unique perspective, rather I simply understand why the prima donnas are easily offended.

I don't think an individual has to face their own death, other than their death of perspective and the way they see things.

Do you really want the faithful to see things from your perspective?

Broadly speaking, it is probably true to say that the Church was more concerned to communicate the schema to the laity than the Bible itself; but in doing so it ensured that whatever of the biblical material became available, either by direct reading, or through liturgy and offices, through sermons, hymns or pictures, was seen in a well - defined perspective.

We do need to see things in the perspective of our times.

We do this through our hands as we reach out and touch or refrain from touching, our mouths as we speak or remain silent, our ears as we listen to the voices of those who cry out or speak softly, and our eyes as we see things from the perspective of our faith.

Very often we don't see things quite so clearly from our perspective but others help highlight aspects of our life that we're not aware of.

I don't see the value of the buttons as anything more than a general barometer of the general perspective of other readers... and without the ability to reflect both positive and negative there is no real value at all.

If you disagree with me, you are wrong, and I don't want to hear from you until you repent of your ways and see things from my perspective.»

An interesting perspective... because we can still wonder whether the entire universe is controlled by an alien being who might at any moment do something for which there has been no precedent in all of human memory... we could still see beyond that practically all - powerful being a being that we could rightfully know to be God even to that other being to whom we are at their mercy.

If you read that from a Jewish perspective then I really don't see how you could get the idea that Jesus was the Messiah.

Humans see the world in a perspective of «if things are good I must be doing something right» and if not, I must have done something wrong.

Dr. Rescher refutes the idea that humans do everything within a setting of place and time, only viewing things from where they are, seeing things only from the particular perspective they happen to occupy.

For example, how do we see the creative and redemptive love of God through the perspective of the age - long development of the immense universe, only a speck of which we inhabit, and of the evolution of sentient and rational life on this earth through thousands and millions of years?

So we're at the place where we can say a couple - four things from the existential side of the problem of evil: [1] from the perspective that pain exists, and we perceive it, we as human beings (you could say «people») have an urge to do something about it when we see it.

I would say all sides come to the forefront, but I think that some of us see things from more than one side to begin with and that there are many «sides» (perspectives) that are out there, I don't think it is a polemic, and I don't think it is «sides» in terms of choosing sides in a war... more a dialogue where confrontations take place, but (hopefully) most of the time not with the intent of winners and losers (or, if that is the intent, that hopefully we realize that and adjust our own rhetoric to move away from that pardigm)

Two fold, firstly, you've helped another person live for a little longer by protecting them from the cold, but for you personally that didn't get anything out of it you could look at it from another perspective, anyone could have seen you and acknowledged you benevolence either by saying something or just thinking how nice it was you did that and then maybe also passing along an act of kindness.

@ chief:» i did nt call your beliefs garbage... i called your perspective garbage» Aren't my perspectives what I believe or how I see things?

It takes even more effort to try to see things from their perspective if we don't really agree with that perspective (or misinterpret it).

jeff - Yes, you do see things upside down from my perspective.

So, from that perspective while Lutherans don't need a movie like this I could maybe see one for Catholics.

In the nature of the case, the Christian does not see what can be seen from other perspectives.

it really is scary that those who claim to be offering the truth can do so with such hatred... wish that you could see behind your prejudiced perspective at how your rhetoric comes across, maybe then someone else could hear your concern or have some dialogue with whatever it is you have to say

The sinister forces that played upon the throne in Jerusalem are best seen in the perspective of the entire united monarchy, extending as it did only into a third reign.

I think it's also important, too, to remember that God's «ways are above our ways, his thoughts above our thoughts» so just because something God said doesn't quite make sense to us, it doesn't mean that it doesn't make sense, we're just not seeing it from His perspective.

I am a Christian and I do not see a president who lives and makes decisions from a biblical perspective.

I do not believe there are different paths, but I do believe we may be seeing the same path from different perspectives.

«Fight or flight» — the way most respond to conflict — doesn't solve conflict, resulting instead in emotional outbursts or a «head in the sand, conflict doesn't exist because I don't see it» perspective (which usually only creates more conflict).

So how does one deal with the reality of a friend who sees God from an often different perspective?

Since I am from a theological perspective that sees culture as a good gift from God, I do not seek to define «Christian culture» verses «secular culture.»

Do you see things shifting especially for maybe people who didn't see things from that perspective beforehand?

«Viewed in the perspective furnished by fifty years, that optimism is now a far - off and almost forgotten thing... We do not see a Christian century, either now or in any century.»

Moreover, immersed in its movement as we are, do we possess any point of perspective from which we may see in what direction the cosmic stream is bearing us?

«We don't want to robotise our church work, but see if we can bring a theological perspective to a machine.»