Sentences with phrase «do sell at higher prices»

Not exact matches

However, they do not sell as they are marginally better than the current technology at a much higher price.

Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.

The bureau says it has reason to believe the stores «failed to offer certain sleep sets at the regular price or higher for a substantial period of time [and]... did not sell a substantial volume of some sleep sets at the regular price or higher for a substantial period of time.»

CAPE indicates stocks are currently valued at nearly twice what they have been in the past, but even Shiller himself admitted earlier this year that high stock prices don't necessarily mean it's time to sell.

Incidentally, while poking around at market oil prices, I noticed that while Western Canadian Select (WCS), which is dilbit, does sell at a substantial discount from WTI, upgraded dilbit is selling for a much higher price.

Don't buy cryptocurrencies when the price is at an all - time high, and don't sell them when they're at an all - time low.

It didn't take long for Chris Maselka to become fed up earlier in his career, when he was asked to sell inferior brands of steak at high - end prices.

This article has brought an interesting question I would sell him back to Man U (at a high price) sooner rather than later we don't need another rvp saga.

In reality Mbappe too high of a price tag, Butland probably not coming this season or not at all, Gortzeka would be an upgrade on ramsay (really has a good engine), but do not see schalke selling 2 players to us.

Sanchez is a quality player, but if he is not getting what he wants negative vibes begin to develop in the squad, we do not want that at the start of the season, because that will be detrimental to any hopes of winning anything and i think it also cost arsenal a top four finish, so all the contract rebels i would sell for the highest price i can get and move urgently for replacement.

Stan is so so so clever he just offered to buy shares at a high price knowing full well Usmanov won't sell by doing so he just put the price of his shares up, hope his gearing up to sell soon and bye bye

BUT I DO NT REALLY THINK THAT THIS IS THE SOURCE OF THE PBM AT ARSENAL RIGHT NOW.THERE MUST BE SOMETHING ELSE, AND WE AS FANS CANT DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT COZ ITS OCCURING WITHIN THE CLUB ITSELF WHICH WILL NEVER BE EXPOSED TO US, ALL WE CAN DO IS TO WATCH AND TAKE DECISION UPON OUR OWN PERSONNAL INTEREST.THE ONLY ONE AND OBVIOUS PBM WE CAN SEE NOW IS: ARSENAL IS TRYING TO PRODUCE CHEAP YOUNG PLAYERS, TAKING THE RISK OF PUTTING THEM ON THE PL AND CL CHALLENGE SO THAT THEY WILL BE EXPERIENCED AT A VERY YOUNG AGE AND TALENTED AND THEY WILL SOLD AT A VERY HIGH PRICE COS THAT SEEMS TO BE THE FASHION NOWADAYS.BUT IT DID NT WORK!!!!! At the end of the day, whos loosinAT ARSENAL RIGHT NOW.THERE MUST BE SOMETHING ELSE, AND WE AS FANS CANT DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT COZ ITS OCCURING WITHIN THE CLUB ITSELF WHICH WILL NEVER BE EXPOSED TO US, ALL WE CAN DO IS TO WATCH AND TAKE DECISION UPON OUR OWN PERSONNAL INTEREST.THE ONLY ONE AND OBVIOUS PBM WE CAN SEE NOW IS: ARSENAL IS TRYING TO PRODUCE CHEAP YOUNG PLAYERS, TAKING THE RISK OF PUTTING THEM ON THE PL AND CL CHALLENGE SO THAT THEY WILL BE EXPERIENCED AT A VERY YOUNG AGE AND TALENTED AND THEY WILL SOLD AT A VERY HIGH PRICE COS THAT SEEMS TO BE THE FASHION NOWADAYS.BUT IT DID NT WORK!!!!! At the end of the day, whos loosinAT A VERY YOUNG AGE AND TALENTED AND THEY WILL SOLD AT A VERY HIGH PRICE COS THAT SEEMS TO BE THE FASHION NOWADAYS.BUT IT DID NT WORK!!!!! At the end of the day, whos loosinAT A VERY HIGH PRICE COS THAT SEEMS TO BE THE FASHION NOWADAYS.BUT IT DID NT WORK!!!!! At the end of the day, whos loosinAt the end of the day, whos loosing?

Don't forget that the majority of truly excellent bedding products are sold every day in high stores at more realistic prices - designer is certainly not the only way to go.

What most people don't understand is that, at the high end, fashion is sold to people so rich that price isn't an issue.

Does Nordstrom actually sell these items at higher prices after the sale?

Entrepreneurs and other sellers incur losses when buyers do not purchase the products they sell at prices high enough to cover costs of production.

I even sat down with the Finance Manager and even though he was doing his job to sell the car at a higher price, he did everything he could to make me happy.

Did Toyota make the MR2 too good?After slicing through the curves at the Moroso Motorsports Park, a race track in West Palm Beach with some wicked twists and turns, one wonders why the MR2 - a baby Ferrari for all practical purposes - isn't selling well.If you looked at the MR2's specifications on paper without knowing its name, you would swear the MR2 was a high - priced exotic with its ultra high - performance, mid-mounted engine, high - tech electro - hydraulic steering system and race - tuned independent suspension.

What they don't realize is if they had sold their novel to a traditional publisher, it would have sold fine at the high price range set by traditional publishers.

I think setting a minimum price is a better answer than anything at the high end because I don't think many people will sell very expensive ebooks.

The psychology of the situation really matters, as does the fact that the publisher looks rapacious and immoral for selling e-books at a higher price than hard copies.

Knowing the particulars of what percentage of my higher priced titles is selling at 35 % isn't all that useful a piece of information, as I don't know where those buyers are in order to try to target market more effectively.

If he prices it too high, the store doesn't sell the books at all.

Among the accusations the DoJ will now bring up in court is that Penguin was actually very instrumental in arranging the «agency model» with Apple in an attempt to force the price of ebooks higher than they were currently being sold for, namely, that Amazon was purchasing the ebooks at the original wholesale price and selling them for a marginal profit — or in some cases, an actual loss, which it is allowed to do as long as it can afford to — in order to sell Kindle e-reader devices.

Very short books don't have much choice; they might not sell at all for a higher price.

I don't see Apple selling it at a higher price, that just doesn't seem to fit their new business model.

Even if you do sell more e-books at a lower price, you might make more profit at a higher price (since you draw less royalty per sale at the lower price).

(We do not recommend selling your ebooks at a higher price than this unless you already have a large, dedicated fan base.)

If they want to compete against Amazon, or at least give a customer a choice, how is offering to sell a reader an ebook at a higher price point going to do that?

Their numbers show that they sell more eBooks at one price point than they do at another, which suggests an author could see more sales of eBooks at the lower price point than the higher, not that they will.

I did think of making a separate dvd and selling that with the video demonstration, however i could make an ebook with embedded short video displays instead, or maybe sell that version at a higher price.

Often people don't actually have your work, even when they sell your book on ebay, they are just taking the details from amazon and making a product listing at a higher price, so IF it sells, they'll buy your book and order a copy... so it's actually free marketing for you.

Let me see if I understand this; when I sign a contract with a publisher, expecting that publisher to properly exploit my work by selling it in every market possible, and said publisher doesn't do that because they want to keep the prices of my books high when Amazon wants to keep them low and sell more copies thereby making me more money via volume, I'm supposed to get angry at Amazon and not my publisher?

And if you price the book too low, it signals potential readers that you don't value your writing enough or that you're desperate (probably because it isn't selling at a higher price, probably because it's a poorly written book).

Maybe Amazon will set high list prices on all of its own new digital titles (it's already done this with its upcoming Tim Ferriss book), while continuing to sell those books at major discounts in the Kindle store.

You could decide to place a limit order in your MetaTrader platform at the resistance you want to sell at, assuming price is below that level currently, then when (if) price does rotate higher into the level, your limit sell order would get filled for a short.

Now I had a clear goal, which is to sell as many bikes at the highest price possible, but I didn't do that by making customers uncomfortable.

That means that if and when you decide to sell, you'll be doing so at a higher price than you would get if you were in a non-HOA community.

So, just to confirm, if you don't re-invest your dividends, are you losing out on this potential to minimize your capital gains because the dividends are paid out in cash and then you just get taxed on it at the end of the tax year and when you sell your investment, you potentially will have a larger difference between the sale price and book value (assuming your security increased in value), and thus pay a higher capital gains tax.

When all these things line up it is a high probability you will win by selling short at price resistance points, buy puts, and take retirement accounts to cash that do not let you buy reverse ETFs.

The very best signals of buying dips into key long term support areas and entering trades on breakouts of price ranges are the very things that traders find difficult to do as they believe that the support will not hold at a time of maximum fear and that a breakout entry is buying too high or selling too low at the beginning of a trend.

You don't need to sell a stock at a higher price to realize value: if you buy cheap and just hold you will simply enjoy an above average yield.

The other problem with investment in commodities is that the assets do not provide any return until they are sold, hopefully at a higher price.

However, as papy02 says above (and I think I said elsewhere), the prospect of the board selling shares @ 32p & then buying them back (possibly, shortly thereafter) at far higher prices seems a mite embarrassing... It certainly seems to suggest at least one of those decisions might be less than smart — and I certainly don't think it would be the decision to buy back shares at an attractive discount..!

This is often done when a property owner needs to sell at a higher price or get better funding in future.

Most of these clients do that to sell the home at a higher price or get secure better loan amount in future.

As you might have thought the growth companies would do well, you would no longer talk about a premium for growth companies once you discover that it's a value company, once that has lower growth prospects and sell at low prices rather than high stock prices, which have provided a reward.

Does the superficial loss work (almost in reverse) if one shorts a stock, then buys it later at a higher price to bring one's position to zero, and THEN buys it long, sells it at a profit all within 30 days but without realising an overall profit?

If this does not happen then the trader could purchase at a lower price, sell in the futures market at a higher price and make a handsome profit.

Just because you're savvy enough to rebalance your portfolio doesn't mean you get to skip out on taxes if you happen sell at a higher price than you bought and reap a profit.