Sentences with phrase «do something about it without»

I personally prefer someone who will stick around and try to do something about it without breaking the team harmony by starting to point fingers at people around him.

We can all make excuses for the physical break down in our bodies but truly doing something about it without relying on medicating pain killers is the go.

so I don know if I could do something about it without paying the dealership $ 80 just to diagnose what the problem is and then if the insurance doesn cover it, have to pay whatever the problem is.

CCSSO and CGCS are arguing for a compromise position, conceding that testing is too extensive in some locations and committing to do something about it without backing a full - scale retreat on testing.

One thing to hope for is that the whole thing just goes away: eliminating the estate tax entirely is greatly desired by one political party and they are currently in a position to do something about it without worrying about Presidential vetoes.

Though certainly none of us would like to think that as renters we would ever have to face this type of circumstance, it is very comforting to know that you are prepared to do something about it without bankrupting yourself if you do ever come against a liability claim.

Not exact matches

It's something a manager can't do with an independent contractor, at least not without worrying about the legal fallout.

«Every console generation going forward will be about half as big as the one before it» as consumers get more options to do something without a console, he explained.

The entrepreneur lifestyle is all about doing something you enjoy without undue stress, uncertainty and risk.

Generally speaking, a NDA makes sense anytime you want to share something valuable about your business and make sure that the other party doesn't use it without your approval, or outright steal it.

Routines allow you to operate efficiently — keep doing the same things over and over again without thinking about it — but they get in the way of trying to do something new.

Without taking the time to think carefully about where your notions of achievement and purpose come from and what success means to you, you're in a terrible position to decide if this week's hot «how to be successful» advice applies to you or only to someone who thinks the point of life is something you actually don't value much at all.

At some point, provided that dividend is safe and investors are convinced it is going to be maintained, the dividend yield on the stock itself is going to be so attractive that it brings in buyers from the sidelines, people who otherwise can not stand to see the yield right there in front of them without doing something about it.

Chen is known to be a straight shooter who does not have patience for finger - pointing or complaining about something without suggesting what he feels is a legitimate proposal for fixing it.

It's easier to enable something if a feature doesn't work without it than to find out that Facebook knows everything about you.

After you contacted about every webmaster that mentioned either your URL or your company name without providing a link to your site, don't forget to add both queries as a Google Alert or something similar.

Then this morning I did see something about historic fact - facing of the party, that it could finally run a candidate without mentioning the «G» word as well as not mentioning Jerusalem as the capitol of Israel.

If you do not scare away the wood demons that reside in any wood products and they overhear you talking about something you will do in the future they will without a doubt try to stop you from accomplishing that goal.

@Lycidas: You said, «After all, how about you tell us something «only a god can do» that you would accept without hesitation.

After all, how about you tell us something «only a god can do» that you would accept without hesitation.

All romancing and trumpeting abroad about one's cleverness in penetrating the God's incognito, though without receiving the condition from the Teacher; that one took notice of him by the impression he made, such a strange feeling coming over one in his presence; that there was a something in his voice and mien, etc., etc. — all this is but silly twaddle, by which one does not become a disciple but only makes a mockery of the God.1 The servant - figure was no incognito.

@ Thinking man:» They had witness something so momentous, so extraordinary that when the authorities threatened with them death if they didn't shut up about Jesus Christ, they accepted death without fear.»

On the other end, when we are amonished, we shouldn't get defensive about it, but recognize that we ourselves might be wrong about our own behavior; we might be doing something that is causing harm without realizing it.

It is hard to learn more about God and to have fresh revelation of him without being motivated to do something about it.

My heart keeps on reminding me about doing something for the homeless but without knowing the how part.

But the sinner himself must do something about it; it does not happen without cost on man's part as well as God's.

Leaders I call «orphans»; men and women without an identity of their own who are compelled to control and manipulate the identity of others in order to create one — nothing they do is about serving others, and everything about gaining something for themselves.

There are people without faith, that's ok it's up to them to believe what they want.But if you say you're a Christian at least know something about what you say your are.If you have never read the Bible at least once how can you say you're a Christian?Can you say you're a Math teacher but do not know how to add?Therein lies the point if you say you're something, know what it is you are.As it is the US is full of h

Highly significant for Christology are these two quotations from Hartshorne's The Divine Relativity10 In the first he refuses to allow «paradox» to cover up illogicality: «A theological paradox, it appears, is what a contradiction becomes when it is about God rather than something else...» In the second he applies this to the relation between God's power and our human decisions: «For God to do what I do when I decide my own act, determine my own concrete being, is mere nonsense, words without meaning.

The press» presentation of Francis» words gives parish priests a chance to speak directly to their people about what Francis really said and thereby to teach them something about the Church's thinking, which is otherwise harder to do in a homily without its sounding like a lecture.

I do not want to end this brief survey of modes of biblical discourse without saying something about the lyric genre best exemplified by the Psalms.

Whitehead refers to Plato's receptacle mainly in the context of the extensive continuum, though it does not fit there very well because the receptacle for Plato is precisely without characteristics of its own — something Whitehead rather says about creativity He also refers to the receptacle in the context of the problem of personal identity (Adventures 187).

please explain... and don't leave out the part about something being created from nothing, without a «spark», i love that part

I think it must have something to do with the con that conservatives have perpetuated on the stupid, that if they talk a lot about «family values,» those people won't notice that their real objective is to make sure that the American workforce gets the bare minimum in order to ensure that rich shareholders can continue to reap their millions without lifting a finger.

Well, he's got me proclaiming, for those who have eyes to see and ears to hear, that something is deeply amiss within; that we think we're special and you are not; that you need us more than we need you; that we don't trust you or your brain; that you are obviously going to hell without us; that we are completely out of touch with the real world; that we don't have a sweet clue about you, your kind, or your needs and desires; and that we're oblivious to innuendo and blind to double entendre.

Try as I might, I can't just move on without doing anything about something so preventable.

Moreover, just as they say something creative within their tradition, so they say something new about the world, and they do so without pretending to offer a divinely revealed science.

[I'm not even really sure why I cared about something being low - calorie or low - fat, but it probably had something to do with the media:)-RSB- It never occurred to me that most of the time the reason certain foods are able to be «low - calorie» or «low - fat» is because companies remove certain parts of whole foods and then use chemicals and additives to recreate the flavor and texture of those whole foods, but just without the calorie or fat.

I almost didn't want to share them (but I did & even my friend who usually protests when I make something without chocolate didn't say a word about the lack of his favorite ingredient).

My pantry sure has changed a lot in the last 24 months: I was able to dive in and find all of the ingredients for this delicious, soothing soup, without having to do a special trip to grab something or other, and it got me to thinking about how overwhelming I found all of this at first.

If you can find a natural food coloring that is brown, or something that resembles peanut butter, then you might be able to do sunflower seed butter without even thinking about it.

Why is every Arsenal fans keep complaining about this draw, one thing I know for sure is that, Wenger is a wounded lion don't think you can take him down so easily because of his injury we know is hard sometimes for any team to face Bacerlona in the peach but is 11 players either side only the quality some times but we do have quality players too so why is the worries come on guys i know We can do this Wenger can do it, is our season it's a reason for the past 9 seasons without trophy God have something special for us & this is it.

The MLBPA won't let a player acquisition structure that large be built without their getting something out of it, though, so maybe we'll end up seeing something done about the service time loophole that will force Kris Bryant to begin in Triple - A this year.

or simply trying to prove us all wrong again by showing that he could play just about anybody anywhere and win a game on the road against a top opponent; something he hasn't done in quite some time... regardless of the reasons, there is simply no excuse for the goings - on at this club... unfortunately it's unlikely that any real change will come without a dedicated effort on the part of those that feed the beast... our absentee landlord doesn't invest his own money into this club, so in order to force out Kroenke, Wenger and whatever other vermin currently haunt our hallowed halls we need to hit him where it really hurts... continually filling «his» stadium and the constant buying of endless merchandise, like one of the 58 different jerseys available over the last few years, makes us the greatest enablers of all time... have we no self - respect?

we well be better without both of them the only biggest mistakes wenger made during summer was not to sell both and recruit replacements we had the entire 3 months to do something about transfer activities wenger blow up 100mln to 120mln and thats the price you pay if you do nt have oversite too much power on single's person hands — from kitchen to training on pitch and i hate to say in my opinion Wenger is trying to be like a CEO / Coach at the same time.

Does Merson ever open his mouth without saying something outrageous about Arsenal?

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

this window has just finished i am already thinking about who we will get for the january window we might try for khedira on a really low offer as he is free agent almost would help boost numbers in midfield in the new year as we will no doubt need to filling the numbers about then also i will hold my hands up and say i was wrong this morning for giving wenger stick and saying welbeck is rubbish i have been out in the cold light of day and had a chance to reevaluate the situation and realized that this could be a canny shrew transfer on wenger behalf actually if wenger can turn the clock back and work his magic on welbeck and get him scoring goals and improve his game then we could have a great underrated signing on our hands its wengers absolute trust in him that might be what makes him a great player as this is something that he never had at old mordor if anybody can make him a world beater wenger can he loves this little pet projects improving players against the odds welbeck has the skillset to be high class player upfornt he just needs to work very hard on his finishing i think once he gets a few goals under his belt he will settle in fine and he is a team player you could put him on the left against man city to shore up that side and he will put in a great shift without a complaint that could be his biggest asset to us or on the right whenever we need him there ithinkwenger might start himon the left against city to protect the left back against navas and i bet you if he does a great job we will take a shine to him quickly i am hopeing he will be one of those wenger gems that he finds and polishes up to a high finish i must admit i was annoyed as some other gunners were at not signing d / m and c / h but if wenger does win the league with this lot it will be his greatest win yet and what might play in to our hands is the unpredictable nature of the league in the last few seasons if we get on a good run at the right time we might be hard to stop look at city they should have never lost to stoke but the result is there in black and white for all to see and i think chelsea will hit the skids after a while to just because cesc and costa are doing well now thats there main threat but teams will work out how to stop them as the season goes on and chelsea will become predictable i think we might just do well this season after all

But we did win something without the DM that everybody yaps on about.

About the match yesterday, he might be rusty I really du n no But without being bias, Wilshere should not start ahead of Drinkwater (based on current form) or Henderson (who is a more able and strong footballer) Something like: Drinkwater - Alli Henderson - Alli Drinkwater - Wilshere Would be good England IF they play 4 -2-3-1... But if you consider this season, I think the best is Drinkwater - Alli..