Sentences with phrase «do standing leg»

This is so simple, but so many people don't think about it when they workout... If you want to improve running, walking, or jumping, you will improve it more when you do standing leg exercises compared with leg machines.

However, when you are sitting you generally focus on one muscle group at a time and don't get the improvement in core stability or balance that you would if you did standing leg exercises.

Not exact matches

This TV stand does away with the furniture part of the equation in favor of two legs that you'll screw into the holes on the back of your TV so that the TV can stand on any old table.

Winner of Inc.'s 2015 Best in Class Readers» Choice Design Award, the Level is made to pair with a standing desk and keep your lower legs working while you do your job.

Morally and ethically Rachel Notley does not have a leg to stand on and she also knows that absolutely.

You don't have a leg to stand on and your kind are desperately seeking ways of stopping the exodus from religion all over the world.

After 350 million years, the fish still doesn't have a leg to stand on.

Well, since 92 % of senior pastors are male, I don't see that you have a leg to stand on.

If anything, I think this will backfire on Republicans if Romney is the nominee because he doesn't have a leg to stand on and many will just stay home.

If the RC had come out a couple of decades ago and asked the public for help in exposing the pedophile priests so that they could be excommunicated and imprisoned, they might have a leg to stand on, but they didn't do that.

If you are able to point out a single negative consequence that would stem from allowing gays to marry then you might have a leg to stand on; but you cant, so you don't.

Unless you can provide me with accruate and verifyable information about how many Christians there were afterwards, then you really don't have a leg to stand on.

If your god is not loving, then you don't have a leg to stand on either.

And «Unless you can provide me with accurate and verifiable information about how many Christians there were afterwards, then you really don't have a leg to stand on.»

Just because you don't credit The Watchmen, Nick Goggin, Darwin Fish and the rest of your zealot cronies from whom you copy / paste, doesn't mean that you have a leg to stand on with this complaint.

Anyone who tries to stop me will find that they don't have a leg to stand on, just like all those crippled liberal veterans and silly black people and foolish Jews!

You don't have a leg to stand on and you know it!

They don't have a leg to stand on.

You don't have a leg to stand on and are simply talking out of your ass.

They don't have a leg to stand on and they know it.

But — and this is a BIG but — you do not have a leg to stand on.

It wont have a leg to stand on and Jesus even said that many will come in his name and say and do mighty works yet he never knew them!

She doesn't have a leg to stand on in court.

They know they don't have a leg to stand on, so they will often settle for trying giving their own absurd theory equal standing to the well - known scientific facts.

chapter and verse as your fall - back position when you don't have a leg to stand on.

They then had to deal with the possibility of being attacked by carnivores, and they came to deal with this threat by running away rather than by standing on their hind legs and trying to fight off the attack with their front feet, as giraffes do, for instance.

He who stands on his tiptoes does not stand firm; he who stretches his legs does not walk (easily).

They don't have a constitutional leg to stand on to sue.

So when in middle age I come at last to believe that a nation builds up a moral treasury of merit by the sacrifices of its people in war and I begin to worry, like the ancient moralists did, that we grow fat, lazy and contemptible amidst our plenty, I don't have a leg to stand on.

But now that the authorities of the Catholic Church have made it clear that if a Catholic school did disobey such a law, their bishops would not support them they do not have a leg to stand on.

Humanism denies men any religion, any suprahuman standard, any timeless point of reference; and without any of these things I do not believe humanists have a leg to stand on, and it is high time the absurdity of their position were realized.

I do not think there is a need for CB, Holding, Beilik and Chambers are aging nicely, Kos has about 3 years left in him, Must still learning, GaBs still here, Mert have couple more games in the legs, Monnreal and Kolasonic can stand in, that is basically 9 CBs.

When you are playing football and you got a high ball to control the slightest touch will push you off it for sure eguaro pushed mustafi but mustafi should have stock his leg out to bring him down or elbowed him in the face well i would have done that Arsenal were not hungry enough for the cup if they were we would have seen some blood running down of some Manchester players Arsenal need to defend in packs of wolves The first half was not to bad we should have scored though but yes no back bone no hunger and no fight What is going to happen on Thursday how are we going to line up against them??? I need to see Arsenal fight like man stand up like man and use their skill and agility to turn Manchester to a loosing side Well if we do nt we need to separate the real man from the phony ones period

Say what you will about Bonds — and we certainly do — but if legends like Aaron and possibly Mays are Team A-Rod, and MLB is happy to move on with all of his numbers intact, the Yankees probably don't have a leg to stand on in their upcoming dinger - centric legal battle.

Messi, come on you don't have a leg to stand on.

He is one of those people that even if he didn't have a leg to stand on he would still find a way to make his hand look strong.

there is no doubting that Arsene has helped to provide us with some incredible footballing moments in the formative years of his managerial career at Arsenal, but that certainly doesn't and shouldn't mean that he has earned the right to decide when and how he should leave this club... there have been numerous managers at each of the biggest clubs in Europe throughout the last decade who have waged far more successful campaigns than ours yet somehow and someway each were given their walking papers because they failed to meet the standards laid out by the hierarchy of their respective clubs... of course that doesn't mean that clubs should simply follow the lead of others, especially if clubs of note have become too reactionary when it comes to issues of termination, for whatever reasons, but there should be some logical discourse when it comes to the setting of parameters for a changing of the guard... in the case of Arsenal, this sort of discourse was largely stifled when the higher - ups devised their sinister plan on the eve of our move to the Emirates... by giving Wenger a free pass due to supposed financial constraints he, unwittingly or not, set the bar too low... it reminds me of a landlord who says he will only rent to «professional people» to maintain a certain standard then does a complete about face when the market is lean and vacancies are up... for those who rented under the original mandate they of course feel cheated but there is little they can do, except move on, especially if the landlord clearly cares more about profitability than keeping their word... unfortunately for the lifelong fans of a football club it's not so easy to switch allegiances and frankly why should they, in most cases we have been around far longer than them... so how does one deal with such an untenable situation... do you simply shut - up and hope for the best, do you place the best interests of those with only self - serving agendas above the collective and pray that karma eventually catches up with them, do you run away with your tail between your legs and only return when things have ultimately changed, do you keep trying to find silver linings to justify your very existence, do you lower your expectations by convincing yourself it could be worse or do you stand up for what you believe in by holding people accountable for their actions, especially when every fiber of your being tells you that something is rotten in the state of Denmark

«Perez does a squat, stands up and throws the touchdown with the guy hanging on his leg.

So while Mientkiewicz doesn't have a legal leg to stand on — «The ball ain't his,» says Finkelman — neither do the Red Sox.

Story for the gods... they don't need Van Persie to beat us, just get some kids off the streets in a Man U, Chelski or hell, even Monaco kit, top it up by putting the moaning one [or just about any brash folk like Berbatov] in the picture and we are in deep s ** t, our players will quake in their boots and lose the plot; we only beat Man City «cos their manager is almost as studious and gentlemanly as our prof. kindly remind me of one feisty game we've won in recent times, ok maybe Stoke [it took a broken leg to Ramsey and constant harassment before our players thought it was necessary to stand up to Stoke].

Milan do not have a leg to stand on in this one in my opinion.

sorry, just not wanting wenger to have the excuse again of a tie in a second leg, to get change we need to get beat, if we finish behind spurs, loose to watford at home and get humiliated in the ucl, and they still do not buy a w / c striker, spend on key players, or change management then i know where i stand...

There were a lot of things that Arsenal needed to do right to stand a chance of overturning the home leg defeat against Barcelona when we met again in the Nou Camp tonight.

I think its time to do something about this, over the 2 legs, ireland were clearly the better side, that notwithstanding this particular french team is the worst i've seen in decades, and they have no bussines going to the world cup.It is time for replays to be reviewed in some cases and goaline technology to be applied in other cases, i think we human being have come of age to realise that we humans are not perfect, no matter how hard we try, so for sepp blatter to keep resisting replays and goal line technology is quite baffling to me, i can't really understand why 3 socalled officials could make a decision, a decision in which the whole world saw to be a foul, and its allowed to stand, and a nation is left, heartbroken, cheated and bitter, i am an african, but as a fan of football, i felt terrible seeing this, and i beg the question, if someone other than the team is not benefiting from this, why can't the officials be allowed to take a look at the replays in order to officiate the game better?

United could ask what they want for the player, and unless Real Madrid comes up with the cash and the player remains happy not to rock the boat, the Spanish champions do not have a leg to stand on.

We can't beat the big sides, our defence won't stand up to their threat, we don't have the firepower up front to challenge the toughest of defences and our lack of squad depth means our legs will go.

Call Suarez a cheat, and you won't receive a single pass all practise; comment on how they don't have an ethical leg to stand on when slagging off The Arsenal or Everton, and you'll probably get a ball to the face (or worse) at a free kick; suggest that their Champion's League victory against AC Milan in 2005 was a fluke, and you just know it's a matter of time before you're painfully taken out from behind.

There are situations and injustices worth standing up to, and then there are weird requests like «please don't wear those leggings because another kid is afraid of them.»

Pre-Walking Skills: Though a jumper doesn't actually teach baby how to walk, it helps him learn to stand, balance, and use his legs.

I'd suggest helping him into a tall kneeling position to play at the box or furniture and then gently help him ease one leg out into a half kneel and help push him up into a standing position (do this to the left and right sides).