These have very interesting potential to
do subgrid modeling in a more rigorous way and are superior as discretization methods for the Navier - Stokes equations.
Not exact matches
Since the scientific understanding of clouds and aerosols is low, how
do you validate your
subgrid models for these things?
If you don't have a strong handle on numerical error, parameter estimation for the many
subgrid models you have is really little better than guessing.
Do you just sweep this all up into a
subgrid model too?
First principles
subgrid models simply don't exist and so your only other altermative is expert judgment, which is a euphamisn for prejudice.
Or
do you understand Jerry to be arguing that all
subgrid parameterization is incorrect?